• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在对新西兰照顾者-儿童二元组进行个体或小组形式的混合式安全圈强化干预后,照顾行为及认知在干预后和随访期间的变化。

Postintervention and follow-up changes in caregiving behavior and representations after individually or group delivered hybrid Circle of Security-intensive intervention with New Zealand caregiver-child dyads.

作者信息

Huber Anna, Hicks Anne-Marie, Ball Michelle, McMahon Catherine

机构信息

Centre for Emotional Health, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Dayspring Trust, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Attach Hum Dev. 2021 Dec;23(6):931-952. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2020.1809057. Epub 2020 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1080/14616734.2020.1809057
PMID:32799752
Abstract

The Circle of Security Intensive intervention (COS-I) aims to improve child attachment security and reduce disorganisation by improving caregiver capacities, including caregiving behavior and representations. Research on COS-I effectiveness with these goals is limited and none examines if positive changes are sustained. A recently revised hybrid COS-I protocol (COS-I-RH) incorporates Circle of Security-Parenting (COS-P) material and individual or group delivery options. We examined (1) post intervention and follow-up changes in caregiving behavior and representations after COS-I-RH and (2) if individual or group delivery moderated changes. New Zealand parent-child dyads with relationship concerns (n=36; child age M =35 months) referred to a community-based program completed COS-I-RH. Four caregiver capacities (supportive and unsupportive parenting (CTNES), parenting self-efficacy and satisfaction (PSOC)) were measured pre- and post-treatment, and one year later. Regardless of delivery mode, after COS-I-RH, parents showed large improvements on all 4 indices of caregiving behavior and representations, maintained at one-year follow-up.

摘要

安全圈强化干预(COS-I)旨在通过提高照料者能力,包括照料行为和认知,来改善儿童的依恋安全性并减少混乱。针对这些目标的COS-I有效性研究有限,且没有一项研究考察了积极变化是否能持续。最近修订的混合COS-I方案(COS-I-RH)纳入了安全圈育儿(COS-P)材料以及个体或团体干预方式。我们考察了:(1)COS-I-RH干预后及随访时照料行为和认知的变化;(2)个体或团体干预方式是否调节了这些变化。因关系问题被转介至一个社区项目的新西兰亲子二元组(n = 36;儿童年龄中位数M = 35个月)完成了COS-I-RH。在治疗前、治疗后及一年后测量了四项照料者能力(支持性和非支持性育儿(CTNES)、育儿自我效能感和满意度(PSOC))。无论干预方式如何,在COS-I-RH之后,父母在照料行为和认知的所有4项指标上都有大幅改善,并在一年随访时得以维持。

相似文献

1
Postintervention and follow-up changes in caregiving behavior and representations after individually or group delivered hybrid Circle of Security-intensive intervention with New Zealand caregiver-child dyads.在对新西兰照顾者-儿童二元组进行个体或小组形式的混合式安全圈强化干预后,照顾行为及认知在干预后和随访期间的变化。
Attach Hum Dev. 2021 Dec;23(6):931-952. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2020.1809057. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
2
EFFICACY OF THE 20-WEEK CIRCLE OF SECURITY INTERVENTION: CHANGES IN CAREGIVER REFLECTIVE FUNCTIONING, REPRESENTATIONS, AND CHILD ATTACHMENT IN AN AUSTRALIAN CLINICAL SAMPLE.20周安全圈干预的效果:澳大利亚临床样本中照顾者反思功能、表征及儿童依恋的变化
Infant Ment Health J. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):556-74. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21540. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
3
Adding "Circle of Security - Parenting" to treatment as usual in three Swedish infant mental health clinics. Effects on parents' internal representations and quality of parent-infant interaction.在瑞典的三家婴儿心理健康诊所,将“安全感——育儿法”添加到常规治疗中。对父母内在表征及母婴互动质量的影响。
Scand J Psychol. 2018 Jun;59(3):262-272. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12419. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
4
The Circle of Security Parenting Program (COS-P): A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Low Intensity, Individualized Attachment-Based Program With at-Risk Caregivers.安全圈育儿项目(COS-P):一项针对有风险的照顾者的低强度、个体化依恋式项目的随机对照试验。
Behav Ther. 2022 Mar;53(2):208-223. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.07.003. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
5
Addressing the Evidence Gap: Protocol for an Effectiveness Study of Circle of Security Parenting, an Attachment-Based Intervention.填补证据空白:一项基于依恋的干预措施——安全圈育儿法有效性研究的方案
Front Glob Womens Health. 2020 Oct 22;1:575752. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2020.575752. eCollection 2020.
6
Parent and practitioner perspectives on Circle of Security Parenting (COS-P): A qualitative study.家长和实践者对安全感养育法(COS-P)的看法:一项定性研究。
Infant Ment Health J. 2021 May;42(3):452-468. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21916. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
7
Travelling the circle together, solo: An individual protocol for the Circle of Security intensive intervention.共同环游,独自前行:安全圈强化干预的个体方案。
J Clin Psychol. 2018 Aug;74(8):1333-1345. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22644. Epub 2018 May 24.
8
The Circle of Security project: attachment-based intervention with caregiver-pre-school child dyads.安全圈项目:针对照顾者与学龄前儿童二元组的基于依恋的干预措施。
Attach Hum Dev. 2002 Apr;4(1):107-24. doi: 10.1080/14616730252982491.
9
Circle of Security-Parenting: A randomized controlled trial in Head Start.安全型教养模式:一项在“提前开端计划”中的随机对照试验。
Dev Psychopathol. 2017 May;29(2):651-673. doi: 10.1017/S0954579417000244.
10
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing the Circle of Security-parenting (COS-P) with treatment as usual in child mental health services.一项随机对照试验的方案,该试验比较安全圈育儿法(COS-P)与儿童心理健康服务中的常规治疗。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 26;17(4):e0265676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265676. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Attachment-Based Parenting Interventions and Evidence of Changes in Toddler Attachment Patterns: An Overview.基于依恋的育儿干预措施及幼儿依恋模式变化的证据:概述。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2022 Dec;25(4):737-753. doi: 10.1007/s10567-022-00405-4. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
2
The Building Regulation in Dual-Generations Program (BRIDGE): A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Pilot of a Parenting Program for Depressed Mothers of Preschoolers, Matched with Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills.双生命周期计划中的建筑规范(BRIDGE):针对幼儿期抑郁母亲的育儿计划与辩证行为疗法技能相匹配的混合方法可行性试点
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Feb;54(1):34-50. doi: 10.1007/s10578-021-01219-1. Epub 2021 Aug 4.