Huber Anna, Hicks Anne-Marie, Ball Michelle, McMahon Catherine
Centre for Emotional Health, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Dayspring Trust, Auckland, New Zealand.
Attach Hum Dev. 2021 Dec;23(6):931-952. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2020.1809057. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
The Circle of Security Intensive intervention (COS-I) aims to improve child attachment security and reduce disorganisation by improving caregiver capacities, including caregiving behavior and representations. Research on COS-I effectiveness with these goals is limited and none examines if positive changes are sustained. A recently revised hybrid COS-I protocol (COS-I-RH) incorporates Circle of Security-Parenting (COS-P) material and individual or group delivery options. We examined (1) post intervention and follow-up changes in caregiving behavior and representations after COS-I-RH and (2) if individual or group delivery moderated changes. New Zealand parent-child dyads with relationship concerns (n=36; child age M =35 months) referred to a community-based program completed COS-I-RH. Four caregiver capacities (supportive and unsupportive parenting (CTNES), parenting self-efficacy and satisfaction (PSOC)) were measured pre- and post-treatment, and one year later. Regardless of delivery mode, after COS-I-RH, parents showed large improvements on all 4 indices of caregiving behavior and representations, maintained at one-year follow-up.
安全圈强化干预(COS-I)旨在通过提高照料者能力,包括照料行为和认知,来改善儿童的依恋安全性并减少混乱。针对这些目标的COS-I有效性研究有限,且没有一项研究考察了积极变化是否能持续。最近修订的混合COS-I方案(COS-I-RH)纳入了安全圈育儿(COS-P)材料以及个体或团体干预方式。我们考察了:(1)COS-I-RH干预后及随访时照料行为和认知的变化;(2)个体或团体干预方式是否调节了这些变化。因关系问题被转介至一个社区项目的新西兰亲子二元组(n = 36;儿童年龄中位数M = 35个月)完成了COS-I-RH。在治疗前、治疗后及一年后测量了四项照料者能力(支持性和非支持性育儿(CTNES)、育儿自我效能感和满意度(PSOC))。无论干预方式如何,在COS-I-RH之后,父母在照料行为和认知的所有4项指标上都有大幅改善,并在一年随访时得以维持。