Heidarimoghadam Rashid, Mohammadfam Iraj, Babamiri Mohammad, Soltanian Ali Reza, Khotanlou Hassan, Sohrabi Mohammad Sadegh
School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Department of Computer Engineering, Bu Ali Sina University, Iran.
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Mar;28(1):600-624. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2020.1811521. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
. Improving well-being and overall system performance are the ultimate goals of ergonomics, which are achieved through ergonomic interventions. This systematic review aimed to answer the question of what different ergonomic interventions accomplish in the workplace. . The systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Ergonomic interventions in workplaces focusing on any ergonomics health outcomes or productivity were identified in electronic databases up to June 1, 2019. . The 1635 articles collected from the literature screening stage were screened for their relevance to this study by the authors independently. The full-text review identified 22 papers qualified for inclusion in this systematic review. Most of the interventions implemented in the analyzed articles were ergonomic training programs, participatory ergonomics and workstation designs. The highlight results showed that interventions such as feedback, participatory ergonomics in short-term follow-ups and job rotation along with ergonomic guidelines did not significantly affect the risk of psychosocial factors. A significant reduction of musculoskeletal disorders in the upper limbs was reported with workplace improvements. There was no specific study method or intervention approach found to influence ergonomic outcomes. A multicomponent intervention program can be used to improve the impact of interventions on employees' health and system productivity.
改善幸福感和整体系统性能是人体工程学的最终目标,这些目标通过人体工程学干预来实现。本系统评价旨在回答不同的人体工程学干预在工作场所能取得什么成果这一问题。
本系统评价遵循PRISMA指南。在截至2019年6月1日的电子数据库中,识别出关注任何人体工程学健康结果或生产力的工作场所人体工程学干预措施。
从文献筛选阶段收集的1635篇文章由作者独立筛选其与本研究的相关性。全文评审确定了22篇符合纳入本系统评价标准的论文。分析文章中实施的大多数干预措施是人体工程学培训项目、参与式人体工程学和工作站设计。突出的结果表明,诸如反馈、短期随访中的参与式人体工程学、工作轮换以及人体工程学指南等干预措施对心理社会因素风险没有显著影响。据报告,随着工作场所的改善,上肢肌肉骨骼疾病显著减少。未发现有特定的研究方法或干预方法会影响人体工程学结果。多组分干预项目可用于提高干预措施对员工健康和系统生产力的影响。