Daboos Mohammad, Helal Ahmed Abdelghaffar, Salama Ahmed
Pediatric Surgery Department, Al-Azhar University, Al-Houssain University Hospital, Darrasa, Cairo, Egypt.
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Oct;16(5):673.e1-673.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.037. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
The success of techniques for proximal hypospadias repair using vascularized preputial flaps has led to their wide application for the last decade. From these techniques, transverse tubularized preputial flaps are particularly attractive. However, high reported rate of complications, including recurrence and urethro-cutaneous fistulae are still challenging the success of these techniques, probably related to vascular insufficiency for the lengthy neourethra. Therefore, many surgeons trying to improve the outcome by utilizing the unique vascular benefits of double faced preputial flap.
the present study tries" to evaluate double faced tubularized preputial flap technique for incidence of complications, in comparison with the standard ventral tubularized preputial flap, and to evaluate also surgical outcomes regarding the clinical urinary function and cosmetic results.
This was a prospective controlled randomized study, included 160 patients with peno-scrotal hypospadias, conducted at Al-Azhar University hospitals, from January 2014 to January 2019. All patients submitted to one-stage repair. Eighty patients underwent double faced tubularized preputial flap technique (group A) and 80 patients underwent standard ventral preputial tubularized flap technique (group B).
Different complications were reported in 12 patients (15%) in group A, compared to 20 patients (25%) in group B. The difference between the complication rates in both groups was statistically significant. 152 of 160 children (95%) had good clinical urinary functional outcomes (short micturition time, good urinary stream without straining or post voiding dribbling) and satisfactory cosmetic results obtained by parents' questioner at follow up visits.
This article presents an evaluation of double faced tubularized preputial flap technique in comparison to standard ventral preputial tubularized flap technique (Duckett) in one-stage peno-scrotal hypospadias repair, regarding surgical outcomes, rate of complications, clinical urinary function and satisfactory cosmetic results. Double faced tubularized flap repair is a good option to reconstruct penoscrotal hypospadias after correction of chordee which have fewer complications and also shows that transferring the tube with its skin appears to achieve better ventral skin covering.
Double faced tubularized preputial flap technique seems to be a superior option, that provide better vascular supply with better results when compared to standard ventral preputial tubularized flap in one-stage peno-scrotal hypospadias repair, with reported fewer complications, better urinary function and good cosmetic results.
近十年来,使用带血管蒂包皮瓣修复近端尿道下裂技术的成功促使其广泛应用。在这些技术中,横向管状包皮瓣尤其具有吸引力。然而,据报道包括复发和尿道皮肤瘘在内的并发症发生率较高,这仍然对这些技术的成功构成挑战,可能与冗长新尿道的血管供血不足有关。因此,许多外科医生试图通过利用双面包皮瓣独特的血管优势来改善治疗效果。
本研究试图评估双面管状包皮瓣技术的并发症发生率,并与标准腹侧管状包皮瓣进行比较,同时评估临床排尿功能和美容效果方面的手术结果。
这是一项前瞻性对照随机研究,纳入了2014年1月至2019年1月在爱资哈尔大学医院就诊的160例阴茎阴囊型尿道下裂患者。所有患者均接受一期修复。80例患者接受双面管状包皮瓣技术(A组),80例患者接受标准腹侧包皮管状瓣技术(B组)。
A组有12例患者(15%)出现不同并发症,而B组有20例患者(25%)出现并发症。两组并发症发生率的差异具有统计学意义。160名儿童中有152名(95%)临床排尿功能良好(排尿时间短,尿流顺畅,无需用力或排尿后滴沥),且在随访时通过家长问卷获得了满意的美容效果。
本文对一期阴茎阴囊型尿道下裂修复中双面管状包皮瓣技术与标准腹侧包皮管状瓣技术(达克特术式)进行了比较,涉及手术结果、并发症发生率、临床排尿功能和满意的美容效果。双面管状瓣修复是矫正阴茎下弯后重建阴茎阴囊型尿道下裂的一个好选择,并发症较少,并且还表明携带皮肤转移管道似乎能实现更好的腹侧皮肤覆盖。
在一期阴茎阴囊型尿道下裂修复中,双面管状包皮瓣技术似乎是一个更优选择,与标准腹侧包皮管状瓣相比,它能提供更好的血管供应,效果更好,并发症更少,排尿功能更佳,美容效果良好。