Suppr超能文献

CHA2DS2-VASc 评分和新发心房颤动、心房扑动或急性脑血管事件再入院。

CHADS-VASc and readmission with new-onset atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or acute cerebrovascular accident.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gill Heart Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2021 Jan 15;323:72-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.027. Epub 2020 Aug 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although risk factors for atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) are known, identifying patients who will develop AF/AFL within the near future remains challenging. We sought to evaluate if the CHADS-VASc risk score (CVRS) can identify hospital readmissions with AF, AFL, or acute cerebrovascular accident (CVA) among hospitalized patients without prior history of AF/AFL.

METHODS

Using the Nationwide Readmission Database, a study cohort included patients without prior AF/AFL or new diagnosis of AF/AFL at the index hospitalization from 2012 to 2014. Patients were stratified based on the CVRS into three groups: Low (CVRS ≤1), Intermediate (CVRS 2-5), and High (CVRS ≥6).The primary outcome of interest was 180-day readmission rate with a primary or secondary diagnosis of AF/AFL. Secondary outcomes of interest were acute CVA and 6-month mortality rate.

RESULTS

A total of 17,820,640 patients were included in our study. Over a 6-month follow up duration from the index hospitalization, the overall re-admission rate for new onset atrial arrhythmias (AF/AFL) was 3.48% (n = 620,986), acute CVA 0.13% (n = 22,522), and all-cause mortality 0.31% (n = 55,632). When compared to other groups, patients with a higher CVRS were readmitted more frequently for AF/AFL [odds ratio (OR) 2.43; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.41-2.45, P < .0001), acute CVA (OR 3.96; 95%CI 3.85-4.08, P < .0001), and all-cause mortality (OR 2.19; 95%CI 2.14-2.24, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

In this large contemporary cohort, a CHADS2VA2SC score ≥ 6 identified patients without known prior atrial arrhythmias at an elevated risk of developing AF/AFL or acute CVA within 6 months of hospitalization.

摘要

背景

尽管已知心房颤动(AF)和房扑(AFL)的危险因素,但确定近期内会发生 AF/AFL 的患者仍然具有挑战性。我们试图评估 CHADS-VASc 风险评分(CVRS)是否可以识别住院患者中没有 AF/AFL 既往史的 AF、AFL 或急性脑血管意外(CVA)的再入院。

方法

使用全国再入院数据库,研究队列包括 2012 年至 2014 年期间索引住院期间无 AF/AFL 既往史或新发 AF/AFL 诊断的患者。根据 CVRS 将患者分为三组:低危(CVRS≤1)、中危(CVRS 2-5)和高危(CVRS≥6)。主要研究终点为 180 天内因新发 AF/AFL 或次要诊断而再次入院的发生率。次要研究终点为急性 CVA 和 6 个月死亡率。

结果

共有 17820640 名患者纳入本研究。在从索引住院开始的 6 个月随访期间,新发房性心律失常(AF/AFL)的总体再入院率为 3.48%(n=620986),急性 CVA 为 0.13%(n=22522),全因死亡率为 0.31%(n=55632)。与其他组相比,CVRS 较高的患者因 AF/AFL 再次入院的频率更高[比值比(OR)2.43;95%置信区间(CI)2.41-2.45,P<0.0001)、急性 CVA(OR 3.96;95%CI 3.85-4.08,P<0.0001)和全因死亡率(OR 2.19;95%CI 2.14-2.24,P<0.0001)。

结论

在这项大型当代队列研究中,CHADS2VA2SC 评分≥6 确定了没有已知心房心律失常既往史的患者,他们在住院后 6 个月内发生 AF/AFL 或急性 CVA 的风险增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验