Division of Cardiology and Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taiwan, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Open Heart. 2021 Jan;8(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001478.
The clinical outcome and threshold of oral anticoagulation differs between patients with solitary atrial flutter (AFL) and those with AFL developing atrial fibrillation (AF) (AFL-DAF). We therefore investigated previously unevaluated predictors of AF development in patients with AFL, and also the predictive values of risk scores in predicting the occurrence of AF and ischaemic stroke.
Participants were those diagnosed with AFL between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2013. Patients were classified into solitary AFL and AFL-DAF groups during follow-up. Finally, 4101 patients with solitary AFL and 4101 patients with AFL-DAF were included after 1:1 propensity score matching with CHADS-VASc scores and their components, AFL diagnosis year and other comorbidities. The group difference in the prevalence of ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and congestive heart failure (CHF) was substantial, that of vascular disease was moderate, and that of diabetes and hypertension was negligible. Therefore, we reweighted the component of heart failure as 2 (the same with stroke/TIA) and vascular disease as 1 in the proposed ACS-VASc score. The proposed ACS-VASc and CHADS-VAS scores showed patients with AFL who had higher delta scores and follow-up scores had higher risk of AF development. The delta score outperformed the follow-up score in both scoring systems in predicting ischaemic stroke.
This study showed that new-onset CHF, stroke/TIA and vascular disease were predictors of AF development in patients with AFL. The dynamic score and changes in both CHADS-VAS and the proposed ACS-VASc score could predict the development of AF and ischaemic stroke.
孤立性房扑(AFL)患者与并发房颤(AF)的 AFL 患者(AFL-DAF)的临床转归和抗凝治疗阈值存在差异。因此,我们研究了此前未评估的 AFL 患者发生 AF 的预测因素,以及风险评分预测 AF 及缺血性卒中和血栓栓塞事件发生的预测价值。
参与者为 2001 年 1 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日期间诊断为 AFL 的患者。在随访期间,患者被分为孤立性 AFL 和 AFL-DAF 两组。最终,通过 CHADS-VASc 评分及其组成部分、AFL 诊断年份和其他合并症进行 1:1 倾向评分匹配,共纳入 4101 例孤立性 AFL 患者和 4101 例 AFL-DAF 患者。缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)及充血性心力衰竭(CHF)的组间差异较大,血管疾病的组间差异中等,糖尿病和高血压的组间差异较小。因此,我们将心力衰竭的权重从 CHADS-VASc 评分的 1 调整为 2(与卒中和 TIA 相同),将血管疾病的权重调整为 1。提出的 ACS-VASc 评分和 CHADS-VAS 评分显示,delta 评分较高和随访评分较高的 AFL 患者发生 AF 的风险较高。在两种评分系统中,delta 评分在预测缺血性卒中和血栓栓塞事件方面均优于随访评分。
本研究表明,新发心力衰竭、卒中和 TIA 及血管疾病是 AFL 患者发生 AF 的预测因素。CHADS-VAS 和提出的 ACS-VASc 评分的动态评分和变化可以预测 AF 和缺血性卒中的发生。