• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期家庭护理安排中护理服务的充足性:三种视角的三角互证法

Adequacy of care provision in long-term home nursing arrangements: A triangulation of three perspectives.

作者信息

Seidlein Anna-Henrikje, Buchholz Maresa, Salloch Sabine, Buchholz Ines

机构信息

Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine University Medicine Greifswald Greifswald Germany.

Department Methods Institute for Community Medicine University Medicine Greifswald Greifswald Germany.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2020 Jul 2;7(5):1634-1642. doi: 10.1002/nop2.548. eCollection 2020 Sep.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.548
PMID:32802385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7424429/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A growing proportion of older people in Germany receive long-term care from informal and professional caregivers at home. Their personal assessment of the individual care situation is scarcely considered.

AIM

This study aimed to explore the subjective views of care recipients, informal and professional caregivers on the adequacy of care provision in long-term home care arrangements.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Qualitative semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with ten care recipients, ten professional caregivers and eight informal caregivers to capture their perspectives on the adequacy of the care received and delivered. Qualitative content analysis was applied using MAXQDA software.

RESULTS

All groups highlighted that they perceive an of care, even though their explanations differed. The underprovision was mainly described regarding the quality rather than quantity of services. It occurs especially in interpersonal relationships and social inclusion, where the gap between the self-perceived current situation and the desires of those affected is most prominent. The ambivalent impact of home care on social participation becomes apparent. Perceptions of an of care range from the view that it appears mainly with respect to informal care to the statement that it is currently non-existent or generally impossible. of care is experienced as serious whenever the interviewees face the challenge of preserving existing abilities or regaining certain skills.

摘要

背景

在德国,越来越多的老年人在家中接受来自非正式和专业护理人员的长期护理。他们对个人护理情况的个人评估几乎未被考虑。

目的

本研究旨在探讨长期居家护理安排中护理接受者、非正式和专业护理人员对护理提供充足性的主观看法。

设计与方法

对10名护理接受者、10名专业护理人员和8名非正式护理人员进行了定性半结构化面对面访谈,以了解他们对所接受和提供护理充足性的看法。使用MAXQDA软件进行定性内容分析。

结果

所有群体都强调,他们感觉到护理不足,尽管他们的解释各不相同。护理不足主要体现在服务质量而非数量方面。尤其在人际关系和社会融入方面存在护理不足,在这些方面,自我感知的当前状况与受影响者的愿望之间的差距最为明显。居家护理对社会参与的矛盾影响变得明显。对护理不足的认知范围从主要体现在非正式护理方面的看法到目前不存在或普遍不可能存在护理不足的说法。每当受访者面临保持现有能力或恢复某些技能的挑战时,护理不足就会被视为严重问题。

相似文献

1
Adequacy of care provision in long-term home nursing arrangements: A triangulation of three perspectives.长期家庭护理安排中护理服务的充足性:三种视角的三角互证法
Nurs Open. 2020 Jul 2;7(5):1634-1642. doi: 10.1002/nop2.548. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
Willingness and preparedness to provide care: interviews with individuals of different ages and with different caregiving experiences.提供护理的意愿和准备:对不同年龄和有不同护理经验的个体进行的访谈。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02149-2.
3
Relationships and burden: An empirical-ethical investigation of lived experience in home nursing arrangements.关系与负担:居家护理安排中生活体验的经验伦理研究。
Bioethics. 2019 May;33(4):448-456. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12586. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
4
Levels of Satisfaction, Workload Stress and Support Amongst Informal Caregivers of Patients Receiving or Not Receiving Long-Term Home Nursing Care in Poland: A Cross-Sectional Study.波兰接受或未接受长期家庭护理患者的非正式护理者的满意度、工作负荷压力和支持水平:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 2;16(7):1189. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071189.
5
How do clients and (In)formal caregivers experience quality of home care? A qualitative approach.客户和(非)正式护理者如何体验家庭护理质量?一种定性方法。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Jan;76(1):264-274. doi: 10.1111/jan.14234. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
6
[Formal and informal support of patients with dementia at home: A mixed methods study within the Actifcare project].[家中痴呆症患者的正式与非正式照护:Actifcare项目中的一项混合方法研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Dec;139:17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
7
Barriers to home care for older adults from perspectives of Iranian informal caregivers: a qualitative study.从伊朗非正规照护者的角度来看老年人居家护理的障碍:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 7;12(12):e065547. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065547.
8
Caregiving at the end of life: perspectives from spousal caregivers and care recipients.临终关怀:配偶照料者与受照料者的观点
Palliat Support Care. 2007 Mar;5(1):11-7. doi: 10.1017/s1478951507070034.
9
[Social inequality in home care: A scoping review on the impact of socio-economic resources on home care arrangements].家庭护理中的社会不平等:关于社会经济资源对家庭护理安排影响的范围综述
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 May;178:47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
10
Caregivers' experiences of a home support program after the hospital discharge of an older family member: a qualitative analysis.老年家庭成员出院后家庭支持项目中照顾者的经历:一项定性分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 11;19(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4042-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of Multidimensional Social Exclusion Among Older Home Care Services Recipients.老年人家庭护理服务接受者多维社会排斥模式。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Sep 1;79(9). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae118.
2
Discrepancies between self- and proxy-rated quality of life in people living with dementia.痴呆症患者自我评定与代理评定的生活质量差异。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2024 Jun 19;10(2):e12486. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12486. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
3
Informing existing technology acceptance models: a qualitative study with older persons and caregivers.为现有技术接受模型提供信息:一项针对老年人和照顾者的定性研究。
Eur J Ageing. 2024 Mar 29;21(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s10433-024-00801-5.

本文引用的文献

1
[Importance of health indicators in the analysis of health effects on informal caregivers : Different indicator, different result?].[健康指标在分析非正规照料者健康影响中的重要性:不同指标,不同结果?]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Feb;53(1):10-16. doi: 10.1007/s00391-019-01663-8. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
2
Concepts of health in long-term home care: An empirical-ethical exploration.长期家庭护理中的健康概念:经验伦理探索。
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Aug;27(5):1187-1200. doi: 10.1177/0969733019868277. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
3
Relationships and burden: An empirical-ethical investigation of lived experience in home nursing arrangements.关系与负担:居家护理安排中生活体验的经验伦理研究。
Bioethics. 2019 May;33(4):448-456. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12586. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
4
Risk Profiles for Care Dependency: Cross-Sectional Findings of a Population-Based Cohort Study in Germany.护理依赖风险特征:德国一项基于人群的队列研究的横断面研究结果。
J Aging Health. 2020 Jun/Jul;32(5-6):352-360. doi: 10.1177/0898264318822364. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
5
Consequences of different types of informal caregiving for mental, self-rated, and physical health: longitudinal findings from the German Ageing Survey.不同类型非正式照护对心理健康、自评健康和身体健康的影响:德国老龄化调查的纵向研究结果。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Oct;27(10):2667-2679. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1926-0. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
6
Encountering existential loneliness among older people: perspectives of health care professionals.老年人中的存在性孤独:医护人员的观点
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018 Dec;13(1):1474673. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1474673.
7
Contrasts in older persons' experiences and significant others' perceptions of existential loneliness.老年人的存在孤独体验及其重要他人感知的对比。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Sep;26(6):1623-1637. doi: 10.1177/0969733018774828. Epub 2018 May 17.
8
"I Don't Believe in Leading a Life of My Own, I Lead His Life": A Qualitative Investigation of Difficulties Experienced by Informal Caregivers of Stroke Survivors Experiencing Depressive and Anxious Symptoms.“我不相信过自己的生活,我过的是他的生活”:对经历抑郁和焦虑症状的脑卒中幸存者的非正式照护者所经历困难的定性研究。
Clin Gerontol. 2018 Jul-Sep;41(4):293-307. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2017.1363104. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
9
Fairness and Eligibility to Long-Term Care: An Analysis of the Factors Driving Inequality and Inequity in the Use of Home Care for Older Europeans.长期护理的公平性与资格:对影响欧洲老年人家庭护理使用方面不平等和不公平的驱动因素的分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 14;14(10):1224. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101224.
10
Explaining the impact of poverty on old-age frailty in Europe: material, psychosocial and behavioural factors.解释贫困对欧洲老年人脆弱性的影响:物质、心理社会和行为因素。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Dec 1;27(6):1003-1009. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx079.