Suppr超能文献

发育障碍儿童经鼻气管导管型号选择的预测。

Prediction of appropriate formula for nasotracheal tube size in developmental disability children.

机构信息

Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Kyushu University Hospital, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.

Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Apr;25(4):2077-2080. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03517-9. Epub 2020 Aug 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Developmental disability children have differences in growth. Therefore, tube size selection is important for nasotracheal intubation. In our previous study for healthy children undergoing dental surgery, height was the most suitable factor to predict nasotracheal tube size. The aim of this study was to find the most suitable formula for selection of nasotracheal tube size for them, retrospectively.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Developmental disability children aged 2 to 10 years were included in this study. They were intubated nasotracheally from April 2012 until May 2017. Their actually intubated tube sizes were checked. The predicted tube sizes were calculated according to the formulas by the backgrounds: the diameter of the trachea at the 6th cervical (C6), 7th cervical (C7), and 2nd thoracic vertebrae (T2) in X-ray. The actually intubated tube sizes were compared with predicted sizes. Data were analyzed using Spearman's regression analysis.

RESULTS

The tube sizes with 5.0, 5.5, and 6.0 mm ID were intubated in 75 patients. The age-based formula was the most suitable; the correlation coefficients (r) were 0.9027 (vs age), 0.5434 (vs height), 0.3779 (vs weight), 0.0785 (vs C6), 0.2279 (vs C7), and 0.3065 (Th2) (p < 0.01). However, 0.5-mm smaller size tubes were more frequently intubated actually. Their correspondence rate to the predicted size was 48% (5.0 mm), 52% (5.5 mm), and 39% (6.0 mm), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The age-based formula could be the most suitable for predicting nasotracheal tube size in developmental disability children aged 2 to 10 years. One smaller size by the age formula was most suitable at first trial tube.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The present data indicate that the selection of nasotracheal tube using one smaller size by the age formula (ID = 4 + age [years]/4) might be useful for developmental disability children.

摘要

目的

发育障碍儿童的生长存在差异。因此,鼻气管插管时选择合适的管腔尺寸非常重要。在我们之前针对行牙科手术的健康儿童的研究中,身高是预测鼻气管插管管腔尺寸的最适宜因素。本研究旨在回顾性地为这些儿童找到最适合的预测公式。

材料和方法

本研究纳入 2 至 10 岁的发育障碍儿童。他们在 2012 年 4 月至 2017 年 5 月期间接受经鼻气管插管。检查实际插入的管腔尺寸。根据 X 射线测量的第 6 颈椎(C6)、第 7 颈椎(C7)和第 2 胸椎(T2)处气管直径的公式计算预测的管腔尺寸。将实际插入的管腔尺寸与预测尺寸进行比较。使用 Spearman 回归分析对数据进行分析。

结果

75 例患者插入 5.0、5.5 和 6.0mm ID 的管腔。年龄公式是最合适的;相关系数(r)分别为 0.9027(与年龄相关)、0.5434(与身高相关)、0.3779(与体重相关)、0.0785(与 C6 相关)、0.2279(与 C7 相关)和 0.3065(T2 相关)(p<0.01)。然而,实际上插入的管腔尺寸通常小 0.5mm。它们与预测尺寸的符合率分别为 48%(5.0mm)、52%(5.5mm)和 39%(6.0mm)。

结论

年龄公式最适合预测 2 至 10 岁发育障碍儿童的鼻气管插管管腔尺寸。首次尝试时,使用年龄公式小 1 个尺寸的管腔可能最合适。

临床相关性

本数据表明,对于发育障碍儿童,使用年龄公式(ID=4+年龄[岁]/4)选择小 1 个尺寸的鼻气管插管可能是有用的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验