Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 8;16(3):e0248296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248296. eCollection 2021.
When selecting the nasotracheal tube diameter for nasotracheal intubation, atraumatic introduction of the tube through the nasal passage and a safe location of the tube's cuff and tip should be ensured simultaneously. To maintain safety margin for the tube's cuff and tip from the vocal cords and carina (2 cm and 3 cm, respectively), the maximum allowable proximal-cuff-to-tip distance was calculated as 5 cm less than the measured vocal cords-to-carina distance. The primary aim of this study was to find a single predictive preoperative factor of the nostril size and maximum allowable proximal-cuff-to-tip distance of nasotracheal tubes. The secondary aim was to compare the difference in the safety margin between the maximum allowable proximal-cuff-to-tip distance based on the patient's airway and the actual proximal-cuff-to-tip distance of the selected tube. We used fiberoptic bronchoscope to measure the distance from the vocal cords to the carina for the calculation of the maximum allowable proximal-cuff-to-tip distance. We analyzed the association of preoperative characteristics such as age, sex, height, and weight with the nostril size and maximum allowable proximal-cuff-to-tip distance. The proportion of patients with appropriate locations of both the cuff and tip was evaluated. Sex and height were significant predictive factors of the nostril size and maximum allowable proximal-cuff-to-tip distance, respectively (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0048). The difference in the safety margin was significantly decreased when the tube diameter was selected based on the nostril size rather than by sex (p<0.0001). The proportion of patients who had the appropriate cuff/tip location was significantly larger (75.2%) when the tube diameter was selected by sex compared to when it was selected by the nostril size (65%) (p<0.0001). It is more suitable to select the nasotracheal tube diameter based on sex rather than by nostril size to ensure the safe location of the tube's cuff and tip simultaneously.
在选择经鼻气管插管的鼻气管内径时,应同时确保导管经鼻腔无损伤插入和导管套囊及尖端的安全位置。为了使导管套囊和尖端与声带和隆突之间保持安全距离(分别为 2cm 和 3cm),计算出最大允许近端套囊-尖端距离比测量的声带-隆突距离短 5cm。本研究的主要目的是找到一个预测经鼻气管插管鼻孔大小和最大允许近端套囊-尖端距离的单一术前因素。次要目的是比较基于患者气道的最大允许近端套囊-尖端距离与所选导管的实际近端套囊-尖端距离之间安全裕度的差异。我们使用纤维支气管镜测量声带至隆突的距离,以计算最大允许近端套囊-尖端距离。我们分析了年龄、性别、身高和体重等术前特征与鼻孔大小和最大允许近端套囊-尖端距离的相关性。评估了导管套囊和尖端位置均合适的患者比例。性别和身高是鼻孔大小和最大允许近端套囊-尖端距离的重要预测因素(p=0.0001 和 p=0.0048)。根据鼻孔大小选择导管直径与根据性别选择导管直径相比,安全裕度的差异显著减小(p<0.0001)。与根据鼻孔大小选择导管直径相比,根据性别选择导管直径时,导管套囊/尖端位置合适的患者比例显著更高(75.2%对 65%)(p<0.0001)。因此,为了确保导管套囊和尖端的安全位置,选择经鼻气管插管的直径时,更适合基于性别而不是鼻孔大小。