Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Colorado, 1700 North Wheeling St, Mail Stop 112, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3796-3801. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07872-2. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
More than 3 million patients have a cardiac implanted electronic device (CIED) such as a pacemaker or implanted cardioverter-defibrillator in the USA. These devices are susceptible to electromagnetic interference (EMI) leading to malfunction and injury. Radiofrequency energy, the most common modality for obtaining hemostasis during endoscopy, is the most common source of EMI. Few studies have evaluated the effect of endoscopic radiofrequency energy on CIEDs. We aim to characterize CIED dysfunction related to endoscopic procedures. We hypothesize that EMI from endoscopic energy can result in patient injury.
We queried the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for CIED dysfunction related to electrosurgical devices over a 10-year period (2009-2019). CIED dysfunction events were identified using seven problem codes (malfunction, electromagnetic interference, ambient noise, pacing problem, over-sensing, inappropriate shock, defibrillation). These were cross-referenced for the terms "cautery, electrocautery, endoscopy, esophagus, colonoscopy, colon, esophagoscopy, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy." Reports were individually reviewed to confirm and characterize CIED malfunction due to an endoscopic procedure.
A search for CIED dysfunction resulted in 43,759 reports. Three hundred and eleven reports (0.7%) were associated with electrocautery, and of these, 45 reports (14.5%) included endoscopy. Ten reports involving endoscopy (22%) specified upper (3, 7%) or lower (7, 16%) endoscopy while the remainder were non-specific. Twenty-six of reports involving endoscopy (58%) suffered injury because of CIED dysfunction: Of these, 17 (65%) received inappropriate shocks, 5 (19%) had pacing inhibition with bradycardia or asystole, 3 (12%) had CIED damage requiring explant and replacement, and 1 (4%) patient suffered ventricular tachycardia requiring hospital admission.
The use of energy during endoscopy can cause dysfunction of CIEDs. This most commonly results in inappropriate defibrillation, symptomatic bradycardia, and asystole. Patients with CIEDs undergoing endoscopy should undergo pre- and post-procedure device interrogation and re-programming to avoid patient injury.
在美国,超过 300 万名患者拥有心脏植入式电子设备(CIED),如起搏器或植入式心脏除颤器。这些设备易受电磁干扰(EMI)影响,导致故障和损伤。射频能量是内镜检查中最常用的止血方式,也是 EMI 的最常见来源。很少有研究评估内镜射频能量对 CIED 的影响。我们旨在描述与内镜程序相关的 CIED 功能障碍。我们假设内镜能量产生的 EMI 可能导致患者受伤。
我们在 10 年期间(2009-2019 年),通过制造商和用户设施设备体验(MAUDE)数据库查询与电外科设备相关的 CIED 功能障碍。使用七个问题代码(故障、电磁干扰、环境噪声、起搏问题、过感测、不适当的电击、除颤)识别 CIED 功能障碍事件。这些与术语“电灼、电灼、内镜、食管、结肠镜检查、结肠、食管镜检查和食管胃十二指肠镜检查”交叉引用。单独审查报告以确认和描述由于内镜程序引起的 CIED 故障。
对 CIED 功能障碍的搜索产生了 43759 份报告。311 份报告(0.7%)与电灼有关,其中 45 份报告(14.5%)涉及内镜。涉及内镜的 10 份报告(22%)指定了上(3 例,7%)或下(7 例,16%)内镜,其余报告则不具体。涉及内镜的 26 份报告(58%)因 CIED 功能障碍而受伤:其中 17 份(65%)接受了不适当的电击,5 份(19%)因起搏抑制而出现心动过缓或停搏,3 份(12%)因 CIED 损坏需要取出和更换,1 份(4%)患者出现室性心动过速需要住院治疗。
内镜检查过程中使用能量会导致 CIED 功能障碍。这最常见的结果是不适当的除颤、有症状的心动过缓以及停搏。接受内镜检查的 CIED 患者应在术前和术后进行设备检查和重新编程,以避免患者受伤。