• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多阶段农村污水处理技术评估与选择:案例研究。

Multi-period evaluation and selection of rural wastewater treatment technologies: a case study.

机构信息

School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.

Department of Architecture and Engineering, Yan'an University, Yan'an, 716000, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec;27(36):45897-45910. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10307-z. Epub 2020 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-10307-z
PMID:32804380
Abstract

Rapid population growth and agricultural development are generating a considerable amount of effluents, which poses threats to the quality of rural water resources as well as sanitary conditions. However, with a range of rural wastewater treatment (WT) technologies available, one major problem facing the practitioners is which to choose as the most favorable option suited to specific areas. In this study, a novel decision-making framework is proposed to evaluate and select the optimal alternative in rural areas of Xi'an within multiple consecutive time periods. Firstly, an evaluation index system is constructed and picture fuzzy numbers (PFNs) are used to represent both evaluation levels and experts' refusal due to limitation of knowledge. Secondly, fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) is applied to derive weights of criteria, which enables experts to assign fuzzy numbers to express their preferences for comparison judgments. Thirdly, evidence theory is utilized to obtain the aggregated values from multiple time periods. Finally, based on the belief intervals obtained, sequencing batch reactor (A) is determined as the optimal rural WT technology in Xi'an from 2006 to 2020, whereas the membrane bio-reactor (A) is the last option. The effectiveness of the proposed framework is further validated by comparative analysis. This research can hopefully serve as useful guidance for the assessment of rural WT technologies in various regions.

摘要

人口的快速增长和农业的发展产生了大量的污水,这对农村水资源质量和卫生条件构成了威胁。然而,由于有多种农村废水处理 (WT) 技术可用,从业者面临的一个主要问题是选择哪种技术作为最适合特定地区的有利选择。在本研究中,提出了一种新的决策框架,用于在多个连续时间段内评估和选择西安农村地区的最佳选择。首先,构建了一个评价指标体系,并使用图像模糊数 (PFN) 来表示评价水平和专家由于知识限制而拒绝的情况。其次,应用模糊层次分析法 (FAHP) 来确定标准的权重,使专家能够分配模糊数来表达他们对比较判断的偏好。第三,利用证据理论从多个时间段中获取综合值。最后,基于置信区间,确定 2006 年至 2020 年西安的最佳农村 WT 技术为序批式反应器 (A),而膜生物反应器 (A) 是最后的选择。通过比较分析进一步验证了所提出框架的有效性。希望本研究能为评估不同地区的农村 WT 技术提供有益的指导。

相似文献

1
Multi-period evaluation and selection of rural wastewater treatment technologies: a case study.多阶段农村污水处理技术评估与选择:案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec;27(36):45897-45910. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10307-z. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
2
A novel fuzzy framework for technology selection of sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on TODIM methodology in developing urban areas.基于 TODIM 方法的发展中城市可持续污水处理厂技术选择的新型模糊框架。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 25;12(1):8800. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12643-1.
3
A fuzzy evaluation and selection of construction and demolition waste utilization modes in Xi'an, China.中国西安建筑和拆除废物利用模式的模糊评价与选择。
Waste Manag Res. 2020 Jul;38(7):792-801. doi: 10.1177/0734242X20908925. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
4
A fuzzy multi-stakeholder multi-criteria methodology for water allocation and reuse in metropolitan areas.大都市地区水资源分配和再利用的模糊多利益相关者多准则方法。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Jun 30;190(7):444. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6813-1.
5
Intuitionistic fuzzy analytical hierarchical processes for selecting the paradigms of mangroves in municipal wastewater treatment.直觉模糊分析层次过程在城市污水处理中选择红树林范式的应用。
Chemosphere. 2018 Apr;197:634-642. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.102. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
6
A fuzzy multi-objective optimization approach for treated wastewater allocation.基于模糊多目标优化的处理后废水分配方法。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Jun 26;191(7):468. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7557-2.
7
A group decision-making tool for the application of membrane technologies in different water reuse scenarios.用于在不同水回用场景中应用膜技术的群体决策工具。
J Environ Manage. 2015 Jun 1;156:97-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.047. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
8
A multi-stage fuzzy decision-making framework to evaluate the appropriate wastewater treatment system: a case study.一种多阶段模糊决策框架评估合适的废水处理系统:案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(38):53507-53519. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14116-w. Epub 2021 May 25.
9
A Hybrid FMCDM Approach for the Evaluation and Selection of Homestays.一种混合的 FMCDM 方法,用于民宿的评估和选择。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 17;19(14):8688. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148688.
10
Fermatean fuzzy ELECTRE multi-criteria group decision-making and most suitable biomedical material selection.停止模糊 ELECTRE 多准则群决策和最适合生物医学材料选择。
Artif Intell Med. 2022 May;127:102278. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102278. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Entropy for q-rung linear diophantine fuzzy hypersoft set with its application in MADM.q阶线性丢番图模糊超软集的熵及其在多属性决策中的应用
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 8;14(1):5770. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56252-6.
2
DMsan: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation and Resource Recovery Technologies.DMsan:一个用于描述卫生与资源回收技术情境化可持续性的多标准决策分析框架及软件包。
ACS Environ Au. 2023 Mar 27;3(3):179-192. doi: 10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00067. eCollection 2023 May 17.