• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用统计建模加强和灵活进行药物警戒审核风险评估与规划。

Using Statistical Modeling for Enhanced and Flexible Pharmacovigilance Audit Risk Assessment and Planning.

作者信息

Zou Min, Barmaz Yves, Preovolos Melissa, Popko Leszek, Ménard Timothé

机构信息

F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, 4070, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Jan;55(1):190-196. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00205-4. Epub 2020 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-020-00205-4
PMID:32804381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7785557/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The European Medicines Agency Good Pharmacovigilance Practices (GVP) guidelines provide a framework for pharmacovigilance (PV) audits, including limited guidance on risk assessment methods. Quality assurance (QA) teams of large and medium sized pharmaceutical companies generally conduct annual risk assessments of the PV system, based on retrospective review of data and pre-defined impact factors to plan for PV audits which require a high volume of manual work and resources. In addition, for companies of this size, auditing the entire "universe" of individual entities on an annual basis is generally prohibitive due to sheer volume. A risk assessment approach that enables efficient, temporal, and targeted PV audits is not currently available.

METHODS

In this project, we developed a statistical model to enable holistic and efficient risk assessment of certain aspects of the PV system. We used findings from a curated data set from Roche operational and quality assurance PV data, covering a span of over 8 years (2011-2019) and we modeled the risk with a logistic regression on quality PV risk indicators defined as data stream statistics over sliding windows.

RESULTS

We produced a model for each PV impact factor (e.g. 'Compliance to Individual Case Safety Report') for which we had enough features. For PV impact factors where modeling was not feasible, we used descriptive statistics. All the outputs were consolidated and displayed in a QA dashboard built on Spotfire.

CONCLUSION

The model has been deployed as a quality decisioning tool available to Roche Quality professionals. It is used, for example, to inform the decision on which affiliates (i.e. pharmaceutical company commercial entities) undergo audit for PV activities. The model will be continuously monitored and fine-tuned to ensure its reliability.

摘要

背景

欧洲药品管理局药品不良反应监测规范(GVP)指南为药品不良反应监测(PV)审计提供了一个框架,其中包括对风险评估方法的有限指导。大中型制药公司的质量保证(QA)团队通常基于对数据的回顾性审查和预先定义的影响因素,对PV系统进行年度风险评估,以规划需要大量人工和资源的PV审计。此外,对于这种规模的公司来说,由于数量庞大,每年对所有个体实体进行审计通常是不切实际的。目前尚无一种能够实现高效、及时且有针对性的PV审计的风险评估方法。

方法

在本项目中,我们开发了一种统计模型,以对PV系统某些方面进行全面且高效的风险评估。我们使用了罗氏运营和质量保证PV数据的精选数据集的结果,该数据集涵盖了8年多的时间(2011 - 2019年),并使用逻辑回归对定义为滑动窗口上数据流统计量的质量PV风险指标进行风险建模。

结果

我们为每个有足够特征的PV影响因素(例如“对个体病例安全报告的合规性”)生成了一个模型。对于无法进行建模的PV影响因素,我们使用描述性统计。所有输出结果都进行了整合,并显示在基于Spotfire构建的QA仪表板中。

结论

该模型已作为一种质量决策工具供罗氏质量专业人员使用。例如,它用于为决定哪些子公司(即制药公司商业实体)接受PV活动审计提供信息。该模型将持续受到监测并进行微调,以确保其可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a36d/7785557/3f294e95bf52/43441_2020_205_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a36d/7785557/3f294e95bf52/43441_2020_205_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a36d/7785557/3f294e95bf52/43441_2020_205_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Statistical Modeling for Enhanced and Flexible Pharmacovigilance Audit Risk Assessment and Planning.使用统计建模加强和灵活进行药物警戒审核风险评估与规划。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Jan;55(1):190-196. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00205-4. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
2
Development of a checklist for the assessment of pharmacovigilance guidelines in Southern Africa: a document review.制定南部非洲药物警戒指南评估清单:文献综述
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2023 Jan 24;14:20420986221143272. doi: 10.1177/20420986221143272. eCollection 2023.
3
Harnessing the Power of Quality Assurance Data: Can We Use Statistical Modeling for Quality Risk Assessment of Clinical Trials?利用质量保证数据的力量:我们能否使用统计建模对临床试验的质量风险进行评估?
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Sep;54(5):1227-1235. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00147-x. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
4
Implementation of a centralized pharmacovigilance system in academic pan-European clinical trials: Experience from EU-Response and conect4children consortia.在泛欧洲学术临床试验中实施集中式药物警戒系统:来自欧盟应对计划和儿童连接4联盟的经验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Apr;89(4):1318-1328. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15669. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
5
Strengthening and rationalizing pharmacovigilance in the EU: where is Europe heading to? A review of the new EU legislation on pharmacovigilance.加强和合理化欧盟的药物警戒:欧洲将走向何方?对新的欧盟药物警戒立法的审查。
Drug Saf. 2011 Mar 1;34(3):187-97. doi: 10.2165/11586620-000000000-00000.
6
Statistical Modeling for Quality Risk Assessment of Clinical Trials: Follow-Up at the Era of Remote Auditing.临床试验质量风险评估的统计建模:远程审计时代的随访。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 May;56(3):433-441. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00388-y. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
7
Preliminary Results of a Novel Algorithmic Method Aiming to Support Initial Causality Assessment of Routine Pharmacovigilance Case Reports for Medication-Induced Liver Injury: The PV-RUCAM.一种旨在支持药物性肝损伤常规药物警戒病例报告初始因果关系评估的新型算法方法的初步结果:PV-RUCAM
Drug Saf. 2017 Aug;40(8):715-727. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0541-2.
8
A risk-based approach to scheduling audits.一种基于风险的审计计划安排方法。
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2009 Nov-Dec;63(6):575-88.
9
[Interpretation of Guidelines on Good Pharmacovigilance Practices for European Union].[欧盟药品不良反应监测规范解读]
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2013 Sep;38(18):2963-8.
10
Effective Pharmacovigilance System Development: EFPIA-IPVG Consensus Recommendations.有效的药物警戒系统开发:EFPIA-IPVG 共识建议。
Drug Saf. 2021 Jan;44(1):17-28. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-01008-0. Epub 2020 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacovigilance - Technological Advancements, Recent Developments and Innovations.药物警戒——技术进步、最新进展与创新
Curr Drug Saf. 2025;20(4):423-449. doi: 10.2174/0115748863356840250112181406.
2
Statistical Modeling for Quality Risk Assessment of Clinical Trials: Follow-Up at the Era of Remote Auditing.临床试验质量风险评估的统计建模:远程审计时代的随访。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 May;56(3):433-441. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00388-y. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
3
Pharmacovigilance in China: Evolution and future challenges.中国的药物警戒:演变与未来挑战。

本文引用的文献

1
Harnessing the Power of Quality Assurance Data: Can We Use Statistical Modeling for Quality Risk Assessment of Clinical Trials?利用质量保证数据的力量:我们能否使用统计建模对临床试验的质量风险进行评估?
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Sep;54(5):1227-1235. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00147-x. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Feb;89(2):510-522. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15277. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
4
Clinical Quality Considerations when Using Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in Clinical Drug Development.在临床药物开发中使用下一代测序(NGS)时的临床质量考虑因素。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Sep;55(5):1066-1074. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00308-6. Epub 2021 May 27.
5
Leveraging analytics to assure quality during the Covid-19 pandemic - The COVACTA clinical study example.利用分析方法在新冠疫情期间确保质量——以COVACTA临床研究为例。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Dec;20:100662. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100662. Epub 2020 Oct 9.