Vanderbilt University.
Psychol Rev. 2021 Jan;128(1):1-44. doi: 10.1037/rev0000253. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
This article asks whether serial order phenomena in perception, memory, and action are manifestations of a single underlying serial order process. The question is addressed empirically in two experiments that compare performance in whole report tasks that tap perception, serial recall tasks that tap memory, and copy typing tasks that tap action, using the same materials and participants. The data show similar effects across tasks that differ in magnitude, which is consistent with a single process operating under different constraints. The question is addressed theoretically by developing a Context Retrieval and Updating (CRU) theory of serial order, fitting it to the data from the two experiments, and generating predictions for 7 different summary measures of performance: list accuracy, serial position effects, transposition gradients, contiguity effects, error magnitudes, error types, and error ratios. Versions of the model that allowed sensitivity in perception and memory to decrease with serial position fit the data best and produced reasonably accurate predictions for everything but error ratios. Together, the theoretical and empirical results suggest a positive answer to the question: Serial order in perception, memory, and action may be governed by the same underlying mechanism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
本文探讨了知觉、记忆和动作中的序列顺序现象是否是单一潜在序列顺序过程的表现。通过两个实验,使用相同的材料和参与者,在整体报告任务(涉及知觉)、序列回忆任务(涉及记忆)和复制打字任务(涉及动作)中比较表现,从经验上回答了这个问题。数据表明,在不同幅度的任务中表现出相似的效应,这与在不同约束下运行的单一过程一致。通过开发一个上下文检索和更新(CRU)序列顺序理论来解决这个问题,将其拟合到两个实验的数据中,并对 7 种不同的性能汇总指标进行预测:列表准确性、序列位置效应、转置梯度、连续性效应、错误幅度、错误类型和错误比。允许知觉和记忆的敏感性随序列位置降低的模型版本最适合数据,除了错误比之外,对所有其他指标都能做出合理准确的预测。理论和经验结果共同表明,对这个问题的回答是肯定的:知觉、记忆和动作中的序列顺序可能由相同的潜在机制控制。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。