International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Aug 17;14(8):e0008530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008530. eCollection 2020 Aug.
We evaluated the protection conferred by a first documented visit for clinical care of typhoid fever against recurrent typhoid fever prompting a visit. This study takes advantage of multi-year follow-up of a population with endemic typhoid participating in a cluster-randomized control trial of Vi capsular polysaccharide typhoid vaccine in Kolkata, India. A population of 70,566 individuals, of whom 37,673 were vaccinated with one dose of either Vi vaccine or a control (Hepatitis A) vaccine, were observed for four years. Surveillance detected 315 first typhoid visits, among whom 4 developed subsequent typhoid, 3 due to reinfection, defined using genomic criteria and corresponding to -124% (95% CI: -599, 28) protection by the initial illness. Point estimates of protection conferred by an initial illness were negative or negligible in both vaccinated and non-vaccinated subjects, though confidence intervals around the point estimates were wide. These data provide little support for a protective immunizing effect of clinically treated typhoid illness, though modest levels of protection cannot be excluded.
我们评估了首次就诊治疗伤寒的保护作用,以预防因复发性伤寒而再次就诊。本研究利用了在印度加尔各答进行的伤寒 Vi 荚膜多糖疫苗的集群随机对照试验中,对参与地方性伤寒的人群进行的多年随访。对 70566 名个体进行了为期四年的观察,其中 37673 名个体接种了一剂 Vi 疫苗或对照(甲型肝炎)疫苗。监测发现 315 例首次伤寒就诊,其中 4 例发生了后续伤寒,3 例因再感染而发生,这是使用基因组标准定义的,相当于初始疾病提供了-124%(95%CI:-599,28)的保护。初始疾病带来的保护作用的点估计在接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的个体中均为负或微不足道,尽管点估计的置信区间较宽。这些数据几乎没有为临床治疗的伤寒病提供免疫保护作用提供支持,但不能排除适度的保护水平。