Suppr超能文献

单纯区域麻醉与全身麻醉对癌症复发率的影响:一项采用试验序贯分析的系统评价和荟萃分析

Effect of regional anaesthesia only versus general anaesthesia on cancer recurrence rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

作者信息

Ang Eshen, Ng Ka Ting, Lee Zong Xuan, Ti Lian Kah, Chaw Sook Hui, Wang Chew Yin

机构信息

Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Croesnewydd Rd, Wrexham LL13 7TD, United Kingdom.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Jalan Universiti, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2020 Dec;67:110023. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110023. Epub 2020 Aug 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There is growing evidence on the influence of general anaesthesia (GA) in promoting the proliferation of cancer cells. The benefits of regional anaesthesia (RA) on cancer recurrence rate in cancer surgery remains unclear in the literature. The primary objective of this review was to examine the effect of RA on the incidence of post-operative cancer recurrence rate in cancer resection surgery.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, EMBASE and CENTRAL were systematically searched from its inception until April 2020.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All randomized control trials and observational studies comparing RA only versus GA in cancer resection surgery were included. Case report, case series and editorials were excluded.

RESULTS

Ten retrospective observational studies (n = 9708; 4567 GA vs 5141 RA) were included for qualitative and quantitative meta-analysis. In comparison to GA, RA was not significantly associated with a lower cancer recurrence rate in cancer resection surgery (odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.53, p = 0.95, certainty of evidence = very low). However, the trial sequential analysis for cancer recurrence rate was inconclusive. Our analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the RA and GA groups in the overall survival rate (odds ratio 1.51, 95% CI 0.65 to 3.51, p = 0.34, certainty of evidence = very low), time to cancer recurrence (mean difference 1.45 months, 95% CI -8.69 to 11.59, p = 0.78, certainty of evidence = very low), cancer-related mortality (odds ratio 1.79, 95% CI 0.57 to 5.62, p = 0.32, certainty of evidence = very low).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the low level of evidence and underpowered trial sequential analysis, our review neither support nor oppose that the use of RA was associated with lower incidence of cancer recurrence rate than GA in cancer resection surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42020163780.

摘要

目的

越来越多的证据表明全身麻醉(GA)对癌细胞增殖有促进作用。区域麻醉(RA)对癌症手术中癌症复发率的影响在文献中仍不明确。本综述的主要目的是研究RA对癌症切除手术中术后癌症复发率的影响。

设计

采用试验序贯分析的系统评价和荟萃分析。

数据来源

对Medline、EMBASE和CENTRAL从创建至2020年4月进行系统检索。

纳入标准

纳入所有在癌症切除手术中比较单纯RA与GA的随机对照试验和观察性研究。排除病例报告、病例系列和社论。

结果

纳入10项回顾性观察性研究(n = 9708;4567例接受GA,5141例接受RA)进行定性和定量荟萃分析。与GA相比,RA与癌症切除手术中较低的癌症复发率无显著相关性(优势比1.01,95%可信区间0.67至1.53,p = 0.95,证据确定性 = 非常低)。然而,癌症复发率的试验序贯分析尚无定论。我们的分析表明,RA组和GA组在总生存率(优势比1.51,95%可信区间0.65至3.51,p = 0.34,证据确定性 = 非常低)、癌症复发时间(平均差1.45个月,95%可信区间 -8.69至11.59,p = 0.78,证据确定性 = 非常低)、癌症相关死亡率(优势比1.79,95%可信区间0.57至5.62,p = 0.32,证据确定性 = 非常低)方面无显著差异。

结论

鉴于证据水平较低且试验序贯分析效能不足,本综述既不支持也不反对在癌症切除手术中使用RA与比GA更低的癌症复发率相关这一观点。

试验注册号

CRD42020163780。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验