• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分娩疼痛表达评分量表(ESVADOPA)的制定与验证。

Development and Validation of a Rating Scale of Pain Expression during Childbirth (ESVADOPA).

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 52071 Granada, Melilla, Spain.

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 52071 Granada, Melilla, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;17(16):5826. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165826.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17165826
PMID:32806536
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7459959/
Abstract

One of the most representative symptoms during childbirth is pain, which is one of the most prominent concerns of pregnant women. There are different instruments to assess pain, all of which require interrupting the woman, thus interfering with the intimacy of childbirth. This study seeks to develop and validate a rating scale of the expression of childbirth pain that does not require the mother's attention and respects her privacy during labor. The study was conducted at a regional hospital in a border town in southern Spain between November 2018 and September 2019. Scale items were developed following a review of the scientific literature, and experts judged the content validity. After a pilot test, the scale was psychometrically evaluated. The psychometric tests consisted of internal consistency analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and determination of the content, construct, and convergent validity. The scale was evaluated by 36 experts in the field and was then applied to 55 women during the active phase of childbirth. The final version of the Rating Scale of Pain Expression during Childbirth (in Spanish, -ESVADOPA) consists of six items in two dimensions. The scale had a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.78, and the content validity measured by Aiken's V co-efficient was also 0.78. The exploratory factor analysis yielded two dimensions that explained 68.08% of the total variance. For convergent validity, a comparison was made with the visual analogue scale, yielding a medium-high value of 0.641. As indicated by the internal consistency and by the content and construct validity outcomes, the ESVADOPA successfully measures pain expression during childbirth and represents a suitable tool for pain expression during birth without the need for intervention or the need for the mother to speak the same language as the midwife.

摘要

分娩过程中最具代表性的症状之一是疼痛,这也是孕妇最关心的问题之一。有不同的工具来评估疼痛,所有这些都需要中断产妇,从而干扰分娩的亲密性。本研究旨在开发和验证一种不要求母亲注意且在分娩过程中尊重其隐私的分娩疼痛表达评分量表。该研究于 2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 9 月在西班牙南部边境城镇的一家地区医院进行。量表项目是在对科学文献进行回顾后制定的,专家对内容有效性进行了判断。经过试点测试后,对量表进行了心理测量评估。心理测量测试包括内部一致性分析、探索性因素分析以及内容、结构和收敛有效性的确定。该量表由该领域的 36 名专家进行评估,然后在分娩活跃期应用于 55 名妇女。分娩疼痛表达评分量表(西班牙语:-ESVADOPA)的最终版本由两个维度的六个项目组成。该量表的 Cronbach's alpha 系数为 0.78,Aiken's V 系数测量的内容有效性也为 0.78。探索性因素分析得出了两个维度,解释了总方差的 68.08%。对于收敛有效性,与视觉模拟量表进行了比较,得出了 0.641 的中高值。根据内部一致性以及内容和结构有效性结果,ESVADOPA 成功测量了分娩过程中的疼痛表达,是一种无需干预且无需产妇与助产士讲同一种语言即可表达分娩疼痛的合适工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec9/7459959/240e0f55da6f/ijerph-17-05826-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec9/7459959/240e0f55da6f/ijerph-17-05826-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec9/7459959/240e0f55da6f/ijerph-17-05826-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Rating Scale of Pain Expression during Childbirth (ESVADOPA).分娩疼痛表达评分量表(ESVADOPA)的制定与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;17(16):5826. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165826.
2
The Chinese version of rating scale of pain expression during childbirth (ESVADOPA): reliability and validity assessment.分娩期疼痛表情评分量表中文版(ESVADOPA):信效度评估
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jul 30;23(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02195-2.
3
Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Rating Scale of Pain Expression during Childbirth Scale (ESVADOPA-TR).分娩疼痛表达评分量表土耳其语版(ESVADOPA-TR)的心理测量学特性
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 2;12(17):1745. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171745.
4
Cultural adaptation, validation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2.0 in the Spanish context.文化调适、验证及评估西班牙文版生育经验问卷 2.0 的心理计量特性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06400-7.
5
Performance of the Angle Labor Pain Questionnaire During Initiation of Epidural Analgesia in Early Active Labor.活跃期早期硬膜外镇痛开始时角度分娩疼痛问卷的性能
Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1546-1553. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001679.
6
Fear of childbirth: validation of the Kiswahili version of Wijma delivery expectancy/experience questionnaire versions A and B in Tanzania.分娩恐惧:坦桑尼亚基斯瓦希里语版 Wijma 分娩预期/体验问卷 A 版和 B 版的验证。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Nov 29;22(1):882. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05134-8.
7
Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire.颅面疼痛与功能障碍量表(CF-PDI):一种新问卷的编制及心理测量学验证
Pain Physician. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):95-108.
8
[Pain assessment during birth : Which assessment tools comprehensibly depict the labor pains during physiological birth?].[分娩期间的疼痛评估:哪些评估工具能全面描述自然分娩时的产痛?]
Schmerz. 2023 Aug;37(4):250-256. doi: 10.1007/s00482-023-00715-8. Epub 2023 May 15.
9
Revisiting the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale: Spanish adaptation, factor analysis, and sources of construct validity.重新审视 Mackey 分娩满意度评分量表:西班牙语版的适应性、因子分析和结构效度来源。
Birth. 2024 Jun;51(2):343-352. doi: 10.1111/birt.12790. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
10
Childbirth Readiness Scale (CRS): instrument development and psychometric properties.分娩准备量表(CRS):工具的开发和心理测量学特性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 27;22(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04574-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Rating Scale of Pain Expression during Childbirth Scale (ESVADOPA-TR).分娩疼痛表达评分量表土耳其语版(ESVADOPA-TR)的心理测量学特性
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 2;12(17):1745. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171745.
2
The Chinese version of rating scale of pain expression during childbirth (ESVADOPA): reliability and validity assessment.分娩期疼痛表情评分量表中文版(ESVADOPA):信效度评估
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jul 30;23(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02195-2.
3
Workplace breastfeeding support for working women: A scale development study.

本文引用的文献

1
Women's experiences of interventions for fear of childbirth in the perinatal period: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research evidence.女性在围产期对生育恐惧干预措施的体验:定性研究证据的元综合。
Women Birth. 2021 May;34(3):e309-e321. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
2
Content Validation through Expert Judgement of an Instrument on the Nutritional Knowledge, Beliefs, and Habits of Pregnant Women.内容验证通过专家判断仪器的孕妇营养知识、信念和习惯。
Nutrients. 2020 Apr 18;12(4):1136. doi: 10.3390/nu12041136.
3
Development, psychometric assessment, and predictive validity of the comprehensive breastfeeding knowledge scale.
职场对职业女性母乳喂养的支持:一项量表开发研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023 Sep 17;20:100239. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100239. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Design and Content Validation using Expert Opinions of an Instrument Assessing the Lifestyle of Adults: The 'PONTE A 100' Questionnaire.使用专家意见对评估成年人生活方式的工具进行设计和内容验证:“PONTE A 100”问卷
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 16;11(14):2038. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142038.
5
Coping Strategies during Childbirth Related to Cultural Identity: Companionship, Choice of Analgesia and Maternal Satisfaction.与文化身份相关的分娩应对策略:陪伴、镇痛选择与产妇满意度
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 12;11(12):1714. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121714.
6
Cultural influence on the expression of labour-associated pain.文化对劳动相关疼痛表达的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Nov 14;22(1):836. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05173-1.
全面母乳喂养知识量表的编制、心理测量学评估及预测效度。
Midwifery. 2020 Apr;83:102642. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102642. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
4
Instruments measuring pregnant women's expectations of labor and childbirth: A systematic review.测量孕妇分娩期望的工具:一项系统综述。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Mar;246:90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
5
Women's experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review.女性在分娩过程中使用药物和非药物缓解疼痛方法的体验:一项定性系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2019 May 30;16(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0735-4.
6
Development and Validation of a Safety Scale Perceived by the Witness of Prehospital Emergency Care.见证院前急救的安全量表的制定与验证。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Mar 1;17(2):101-107. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000567.
7
A first contribution to the validation of the Italian version of the Behavioral Pain Scale in sedated, intubated, and mechanically ventilated paediatric patients.对意大利版行为疼痛量表在镇静、插管和机械通气儿科患者中的有效性的首次贡献。
Acta Biomed. 2018 Dec 7;89(7-S):19-24. doi: 10.23750/abm.v89i7-S.7945.
8
Addressing disrespect and abuse during childbirth in facilities.解决医疗机构分娩过程中的不尊重和虐待问题。
Reprod Health Matters. 2018;26(53):1-5. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1509970.
9
Efficacy of an educational manual for childbirth companions: pilot study of a randomized clinical trial.分娩陪伴者教育手册的效果:一项随机临床试验的初步研究
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018;26:e2996. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2277.2996. Epub 2018 May 7.
10
Creating a positive perception of childbirth experience: systematic review and meta-analysis of prenatal and intrapartum interventions.营造积极的分娩体验感知:产前和产时干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Reprod Health. 2018 May 2;15(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0511-x.