Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão-SE 49100-000, Brazil.
Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;17(16):5837. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165837.
Despite the widespread use of the expression "physical activity pattern" (PAP), there apparently is no general consensus regarding its definition. This systematic review aimed to examine available research focussing on (1) definitions of PAP, (2) instruments/techniques used to describe PAP, (3) statistical approaches used to analyse PAP, and (4) implications of PAP on children's health. A systematic review of the available literature was done to identify studies published up to October 2019, and 76 studies were eligible. None of the studies presented a formal definition of PAP; a wide range of instruments were used to investigate children's PAP, and most of the revised studies did not explicitly present a formal statistical model to define PAP. Twenty-four papers purported to examine associations between PAP and health indicators. The review highlights no consensus on a clear PAP definition whatever the instrument used to capture it, and we did not find any agreement regarding how best to analyse PAP. We suggest that PAP should be used when targeting the investigation of similarities/dissimilarities, as well as stabilities and/or changes in children's PA at an intra-personal level. In sum, PAP should be used to best describe individual streams of behaviours, and not exclusively PA levels/intensities.
尽管“身体活动模式”(PAP)这一表述被广泛使用,但显然对于其定义尚未达成普遍共识。本系统综述旨在考察现有的研究,重点关注:(1)PAP 的定义,(2)用于描述 PAP 的工具/技术,(3)用于分析 PAP 的统计方法,以及(4)PAP 对儿童健康的影响。对现有文献进行系统综述,以确定截至 2019 年 10 月发表的研究,共有 76 项研究符合条件。没有一项研究提出 PAP 的正式定义;广泛使用各种仪器来研究儿童的 PAP,并且大多数修订后的研究并没有明确提出定义 PAP 的正式统计模型。二十四篇论文声称研究了 PAP 与健康指标之间的关联。本综述强调,无论使用何种仪器来捕捉 PAP,都没有关于 PAP 明确定义的共识,我们也没有找到关于如何最好地分析 PAP 的共识。我们建议,在针对个体内在水平上的儿童 PA 的相似性/差异性、稳定性和/或变化进行调查时,应该使用 PAP。总之,应该使用 PAP 来最好地描述个体行为流,而不仅仅是 PA 水平/强度。