• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院物理治疗感知满意度问卷(H-PTPS)的构建、因子结构和内部一致性信度。

Construction, Factor Structure, and Internal Consistency Reliability of the Hospital Physical Therapy Perceived Satisfaction Questionnaire (H-PTPS).

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, University of Sevilla, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.

Department of Physiotherapy, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;17(16):5857. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165857.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17165857
PMID:32806784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7459722/
Abstract

Patient satisfaction is a crucial aspect in the evaluation of the quality of health care provided by health services and units, especially in patients that require physical rehabilitation. This study aims to design and analyze the factor structure and internal consistency reliability of the Hospital Physical Therapy Perceived Satisfaction Questionnaire (H-PTPS) measuring the level of physical therapy patient satisfaction in hospital rehabilitation services. This study has a multicenter cross-sectional survey design. This study used the structural validity and internal consistency domains from COSMIN (consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments) guideline. The H-PTPS questionnaire consists of 20 closed questions. A sample of 384 adult patients from physical therapy units from three Spanish public hospitals completed this questionnaire. A factor structure and internal consistency reliability analysis were performed. The factor analysis including the 20 items of the H-PTPS showed an adequacy index of 0.922 according to the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure and the Barlett test allowed us to reject the null hypothesis ( < 0.001). In the rotated component matrix, four specific factors were obtained, explaining 66.75% of the accumulated variance. All factors present satisfactory internal reliability, achieving Cronbach's alpha indices and Omega coefficients higher than 0.74. The H-PTPS questionnaire has shown a four-factor solution with satisfactory reliability evaluating the satisfaction of Spanish patients treated in physical therapy units in the hospital rehabilitation services.

摘要

患者满意度是评估医疗服务和单位提供的医疗质量的一个关键方面,特别是在需要身体康复的患者中。本研究旨在设计和分析医院物理治疗感知满意度问卷(H-PTPS)的因子结构和内部一致性信度,以衡量医院康复服务中物理治疗患者的满意度水平。本研究采用多中心横断面调查设计。本研究使用了 COSMIN(健康状况测量仪器选择的共识标准)指南的结构有效性和内部一致性领域。H-PTPS 问卷由 20 个封闭问题组成。来自西班牙三家公立医院物理治疗科的 384 名成年患者完成了这份问卷。进行了因子结构和内部一致性可靠性分析。因子分析包括 H-PTPS 的 20 个项目,根据 Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 度量法,其充分性指数为 0.922,Bartlett 检验允许我们拒绝零假设(<0.001)。在旋转成分矩阵中,得到了四个特定的因子,解释了累积方差的 66.75%。所有因子的内部可靠性均令人满意,达到了 Cronbach's alpha 指数和 Omega 系数均高于 0.74。H-PTPS 问卷在评估在医院康复服务中接受物理治疗的西班牙患者的满意度方面,表现出四因子解决方案,具有令人满意的可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1758/7459722/0daa9be66eca/ijerph-17-05857-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1758/7459722/0daa9be66eca/ijerph-17-05857-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1758/7459722/0daa9be66eca/ijerph-17-05857-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Construction, Factor Structure, and Internal Consistency Reliability of the Hospital Physical Therapy Perceived Satisfaction Questionnaire (H-PTPS).医院物理治疗感知满意度问卷(H-PTPS)的构建、因子结构和内部一致性信度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;17(16):5857. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165857.
2
The MedRisk Instrument for Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Physical Therapy Care: a psychometric analysis.用于测量患者对物理治疗护理满意度的MedRisk工具:一项心理测量分析。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005 Jan;35(1):24-32. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2005.35.1.24.
3
Validation of a patient satisfaction questionnaire for services provided in Spanish community pharmacies.验证西班牙语社区药店提供的服务的患者满意度问卷。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2011 Dec;33(6):949-57. doi: 10.1007/s11096-011-9566-2. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of a modified Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-D) for patients hospitalized with acute abdominal pain.对丹麦版改良的美国疼痛协会患者结局问卷(APS-POQ-R-D)用于急性腹痛住院患者的心理测量学评估。
Scand J Pain. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):117-130. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0106.
5
Development and validation of an in-patient satisfaction questionnaire.住院患者满意度调查问卷的编制与验证
Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Dec;17(6):465-72. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi067. Epub 2005 Aug 12.
6
Development and validation of the Chinese surgical inpatient satisfaction and comfort questionnaire.中文外科住院患者满意度和舒适度问卷的编制和验证。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 30;100(52):e28363. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028363.
7
Reliability and validity of the adapted Dutch version of the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire.修订版脊柱侧弯研究学会22项问卷荷兰语改编版的信度和效度
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1663-72. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.046. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
8
Scale to measure patient satisfaction with physical therapy.用于衡量患者对物理治疗满意度的量表。
Phys Ther. 2002 Jul;82(7):682-91.
9
Oral impact on daily performance (OIDP) scale for use in Sri Lankan adolescents: a cross sectional modification and validation study.用于斯里兰卡青少年的口腔影响日常生活量表(OIDP)的跨横断面修正和验证研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Jan 21;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-1006-z.
10
Italian version of the physical therapy patient satisfaction questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties.意大利版物理治疗患者满意度问卷:跨文化调适与心理计量特性。
Phys Ther. 2013 Jul;93(7):911-22. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120170. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Construction and content validation of a measurement tool to evaluate person-centered therapeutic relationships in physiotherapy services.构建并验证评估物理治疗服务中以患者为中心的治疗关系的测量工具。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0228916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228916. eCollection 2020.
2
The Influence of Patient Choice of First Provider on Costs and Outcomes: Analysis From a Physical Therapy Patient Registry.患者对首诊医生选择的影响对成本和结果的影响:来自物理治疗患者登记处的分析。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Feb;48(2):63-71. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7423. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
3
Discharge communication practices and healthcare provider and patient preferences, satisfaction and comprehension: A systematic review.
出院沟通实践与医疗服务提供者及患者的偏好、满意度和理解:一项系统综述。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Oct 1;29(6):752-768. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx121.
4
Patient-centeredness in physiotherapy: What does it entail? A systematic review of qualitative studies.物理治疗中的以患者为中心:它包含什么?对定性研究的系统评价。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2017 Nov;33(11):825-840. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1357151. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
5
Do patient perceptions of provider communication relate to experiences of physical pain?患者对医疗服务提供者沟通的认知与身体疼痛体验有关吗?
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Feb;101(2):209-213. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
6
Patient-defined desired outcome, success criteria, and expectation in outpatient physical therapy: a longitudinal assessment.门诊物理治疗中患者定义的期望结果、成功标准和期望:一项纵向评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jan 31;15(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0604-1.
7
The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument.基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)以及如何选择结果测量仪器。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2016 Jan 19;20(2):105-13. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143.
8
Exploring Health Care Professionals' Perceptions of Incidents and Incident Reporting in Rehabilitation Settings.探讨康复环境中医疗保健专业人员对事件和事件报告的看法。
J Patient Saf. 2019 Jun;15(2):154-160. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000214.
9
ABCs of Hospitalized Patients: A Simple Before-After Study of a Communication Tool to Improve Quality of Inpatient Care.住院患者 ABC:一种用于改善住院患者护理质量的沟通工具的简单前后研究。
J Patient Saf. 2019 Jun;15(2):161-165. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000212.
10
Satisfaction measurement instruments for healthcare service users: a systematic review.医疗服务使用者满意度测量工具:一项系统评价
Cad Saude Publica. 2015 Jan;31(1):11-25. doi: 10.1590/0102-311x00027014.