• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

构建并验证评估物理治疗服务中以患者为中心的治疗关系的测量工具。

Construction and content validation of a measurement tool to evaluate person-centered therapeutic relationships in physiotherapy services.

机构信息

University of León, Health Sciences School, Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, Ponferrada León, Spain.

Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Physical Therapy Department, Plaza Reyes Católicos, Elche, Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0228916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228916. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0228916
PMID:32119676
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7051061/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to develop a tool for evaluating person-centered therapeutic relationships within physiotherapy services, and to examine the content validity of the same.

METHODS

A mixed qualitative and quantitative study was performed in three distinct phases: 1) the items were generated based on a literature review and a content analysis of focus groups of patients and physiotherapists; 2) an e-Delphi survey process was performed based on three rounds to select and refine the proposed questionnaire; 3) two rounds of cognitive interviews were conducted to evaluate the comprehension of items, the clarity of language and the appropriateness and relevance of content.

RESULTS

Thirty-one items were generated based on the seven domains identified after the analysis of four focus groups of physiotherapists and four patient focus groups. Nine experts participated in the e-Delphi survey. Fifty-five patients participated in the two rounds of the cognitive pre-tests. Participating patients were from public and private physical therapy services. Based on the participants' suggestions, four items were removed, and four were added, whereas 16 were reworded.

CONCLUSIONS

The final tool comprised 31 items divided into seven domains. The response format was based on a 5-point Likert frequency scale. The response options ranged from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree".

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发一种评估物理治疗服务中以患者为中心的治疗关系的工具,并检验其内容效度。

方法

采用混合定性和定量研究方法,分三个阶段进行:1)基于文献回顾和患者与物理治疗师焦点小组的内容分析生成条目;2)通过三轮电子德尔菲调查过程选择和精炼拟议问卷;3)进行两轮认知访谈,以评估条目的理解、语言清晰度以及内容的适当性和相关性。

结果

基于对四个物理治疗师焦点小组和四个患者焦点小组的分析,确定了七个领域,共生成了 31 个条目。9 名专家参加了电子德尔菲调查。55 名患者参加了两轮认知预测试。参与的患者来自公立和私立物理治疗服务机构。根据参与者的建议,删除了 4 个条目,添加了 4 个条目,对 16 个条目进行了重新措辞。

结论

最终工具包括 31 个条目,分为七个领域。反应格式基于 5 点李克特频率量表。反应选项范围从“非常同意”到“非常不同意”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4694/7051061/0d1e5b1c3514/pone.0228916.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4694/7051061/0d1e5b1c3514/pone.0228916.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4694/7051061/0d1e5b1c3514/pone.0228916.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Construction and content validation of a measurement tool to evaluate person-centered therapeutic relationships in physiotherapy services.构建并验证评估物理治疗服务中以患者为中心的治疗关系的测量工具。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0228916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228916. eCollection 2020.
2
Adaptation of the person centered therapeutic relationship patient version (PCTR-PT) to a version for physiotherapists (PCTR-PHYS) and evaluation of its psychometric properties.适应以人为中心的治疗关系患者版(PCTR-PT)为物理治疗师版(PCTR-PHYS),并评估其心理测量特性。
Physiother Res Int. 2023 Oct;28(4):e2007. doi: 10.1002/pri.2007. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
3
Validity of the Flemish working alliance inventory in a Dutch physiotherapy setting in patients with shoulder pain.弗拉芒工作联盟量表在荷兰肩痛患者物理治疗环境中的效度
Physiother Theory Pract. 2018 May;34(5):384-392. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1400141. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
4
Development and initial evaluation of an instrument to assess physiotherapists' clinical reasoning focused on clients' behavior change.一种用于评估物理治疗师以客户行为改变为重点的临床推理的工具的开发与初步评估。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2018 May;34(5):367-383. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1419521. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
5
Minimum standards of clinical practice for physiotherapists working in critical care settings in Australia and New Zealand: A modified Delphi technique.澳大利亚和新西兰危重症护理环境中物理治疗师的临床实践最低标准:改良德尔菲技术。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2016 Aug;32(6):468-482. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2016.1145311. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
6
Feasibility of a physical activity pathway for Irish primary care physiotherapy services.爱尔兰初级保健物理治疗服务中身体活动途径的可行性
Physiotherapy. 2017 Mar;103(1):106-112. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
7
Development and evaluation of the measurement properties of a generic questionnaire measuring patient perceptions of person-centred care.中文译文:患者对以人为主的关怀感知通用问卷的测量特性的发展和评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 20;20(1):960. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05770-w.
8
Development of a tool to assess core cardiorespiratory physiotherapy skills: a Delphi study.开发一种评估核心心肺物理治疗技能的工具:德尔菲研究。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Sep;38(9):1245-1253. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1827467. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
9
Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study.基于医院的物理治疗部门的质量指标的开发:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Jun;9(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000812.
10
A framework for establishing connections in physiotherapy practice.一个在物理治疗实践中建立联系的框架。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2019 Jan;35(1):40-56. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1434707. Epub 2018 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Person-Centered Therapeutic Relationship in Physiotherapy Scale to European Portuguese.以患者为中心的物理治疗关系量表在欧洲葡萄牙语中的跨文化适应与验证。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 5;12(23):2455. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232455.
2
Content Validity of a Scale Designed to Measure the Access of Older Adults to Outpatient Health Services.用于测量老年人获得门诊卫生服务机会的量表的内容效度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 16;19(16):10102. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610102.
3
The Influence of the Locus of Control Construct on the Efficacy of Physiotherapy Treatments in Patients with Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' experience regarding therapeutic person-centered relationships in physiotherapy services: A qualitative study.患者对物理治疗服务中治疗性以人为主的关系的体验:一项定性研究。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Jan;37(1):17-27. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1603258. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
2
Underestimating or overestimating the power of therapeutic nurse-patient interactions.低估或高估治疗性护患互动的力量。
J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2018 Nov;31(4):100-101. doi: 10.1111/jcap.12221.
3
Development and pre-testing of the Patient Engagement In Research Scale (PEIRS) to assess the quality of engagement from a patient perspective.
控制点结构对慢性疼痛患者物理治疗效果的影响:一项系统评价
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 7;12(2):232. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020232.
4
The psychometric properties of the person-centered therapeutic relationship in physiotherapy scale.以人为中心的治疗关系在物理治疗量表中的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 6;15(11):e0241010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241010. eCollection 2020.
5
Construction, Factor Structure, and Internal Consistency Reliability of the Hospital Physical Therapy Perceived Satisfaction Questionnaire (H-PTPS).医院物理治疗感知满意度问卷(H-PTPS)的构建、因子结构和内部一致性信度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;17(16):5857. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165857.
患者参与研究量表(PEIRS)的制定和预测试,以从患者角度评估参与的质量。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206588. eCollection 2018.
4
Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study.通过患者报告体验指标评估以患者为中心程度(ASPIRED):一项混合方法研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 21;8(10):e025896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025896.
5
Physical therapists' perceptions and experiences about barriers and facilitators of therapeutic patient-centred relationships during outpatient rehabilitation: a qualitative study.物理治疗师对门诊康复治疗中以患者为中心的治疗关系的障碍和促进因素的看法和经验:一项定性研究。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2018 Nov-Dec;22(6):484-492. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
6
COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.COSMIN 方法学用于评估患者报告结局测量的内容效度:一项德尔菲研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
7
Assessing physiotherapists' communication skills for promoting patient autonomy for self-management: reliability and validity of the communication evaluation in rehabilitation tool.评估物理治疗师促进患者自主进行自我管理的沟通技巧:康复工具中的沟通评估的信度和效度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jul;41(14):1699-1705. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1443159. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
8
Patient-centeredness in physiotherapy: What does it entail? A systematic review of qualitative studies.物理治疗中的以患者为中心:它包含什么?对定性研究的系统评价。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2017 Nov;33(11):825-840. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1357151. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
9
Content Validity of a Psychotherapeutic Intervention Model in Nursing: A Modified e-Delphi Study.护理中一种心理治疗干预模型的内容效度:一项改良的电子德尔菲研究。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017 Apr;31(2):147-156. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
10
Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: A concept analysis based on a literature review.医院护理中的患者赋权、患者参与和以患者为中心:基于文献综述的概念分析
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Dec;99(12):1923-1939. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.026. Epub 2016 Jul 18.