Suppr超能文献

开放性根治性前列腺切除术的单晚住院

Single-night stay for open radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Nason Gregory J, Kim Justin K, HeeTan Guan, Ajib Khaled, Nam Robert K

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto ON, Canada.

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Mar;15(3):E130-E134. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6600.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of an enhanced care pathway on length of stay (LOS) for open radical prostatectomy (RP) given that robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is not available to all patients in Canada.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all RPs performed. An enhanced care pathway was established for RPs in 2011. Patients were compared in the period before (2005-2010) and after (2011-2019) the introduction of the pathway.

RESULTS

During the study period, 581 RPs were performed by a single surgeon with a median followup of 66.9 months (range 3-176). A total of 211 (36.3%) RPs were performed from 2005-2010, while 370 (63.9%) were performed from 2011-2019. The median age at RP was 65 years (range 44-81). Following the introduction of an enhanced care pathway, there were significant decreases in intraoperative blood loss (350 ml vs. 200 ml; p=0.0001) and the use of surgical drains (90% vs. 9.5%; p=0.0001). The median LOS over the whole study period was one day (range 1-7), which significantly decreased with the enhanced care pathway (3 vs. 1 day; p=0.0001). Since introducing the enhanced care pathway in 2011, 344 (93%) patients were discharged day 1 following surgery. There were no differences in post-discharge presentations to the emergency department (5.7% vs. 9%; p=0.15) or 30-day readmission rates (3.8% vs. 3.8%; p=1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

A single-night stay for open RP is safe and achievable for most patients. A dedicated, multifaceted pathway is required to attain targets for a safe and timely discharge.

摘要

引言

鉴于加拿大并非所有患者都能接受机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP),本研究旨在评估强化护理路径对开放性根治性前列腺切除术(RP)住院时间(LOS)的影响。

方法

对所有实施的RP手术进行回顾性研究。2011年为RP手术建立了强化护理路径。对路径引入前(2005 - 2010年)和引入后(2011 - 2019年)的患者进行比较。

结果

在研究期间,由一名外科医生实施了581例RP手术,中位随访时间为66.9个月(范围3 - 176个月)。2005 - 2010年共实施了211例(36.3%)RP手术,而2011 - 2019年实施了370例(63.9%)。RP手术时的中位年龄为65岁(范围44 - 81岁)。引入强化护理路径后,术中失血量显著减少(350毫升对200毫升;p = 0.0001),手术引流管的使用也显著减少(90%对9.5%;p = 0.0001)。整个研究期间的中位住院时间为1天(范围1 - 7天),强化护理路径使其显著缩短(3天对1天;p = 0.0001)。自2011年引入强化护理路径以来,344例(93%)患者术后第1天出院。出院后到急诊科就诊情况(5.7%对9%;p = 0.15)或30天再入院率(3.8%对3.8%;p = 1.00)无差异。

结论

对于大多数患者而言,开放性RP术后单晚住院是安全可行的。需要一条专门的、多方面的路径来实现安全及时出院的目标。

相似文献

1
Single-night stay for open radical prostatectomy.开放性根治性前列腺切除术的单晚住院
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Mar;15(3):E130-E134. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6600.
7
Same Day Discharge after Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的当日出院。
J Urol. 2019 Nov;202(5):959-963. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000353. Epub 2019 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

3
Same Day Discharge after Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的当日出院。
J Urol. 2019 Nov;202(5):959-963. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000353. Epub 2019 Oct 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验