• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放性根治性前列腺切除术的单晚住院

Single-night stay for open radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Nason Gregory J, Kim Justin K, HeeTan Guan, Ajib Khaled, Nam Robert K

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto ON, Canada.

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Mar;15(3):E130-E134. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6600.

DOI:10.5489/cuaj.6600
PMID:32807288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7943245/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of an enhanced care pathway on length of stay (LOS) for open radical prostatectomy (RP) given that robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is not available to all patients in Canada.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all RPs performed. An enhanced care pathway was established for RPs in 2011. Patients were compared in the period before (2005-2010) and after (2011-2019) the introduction of the pathway.

RESULTS

During the study period, 581 RPs were performed by a single surgeon with a median followup of 66.9 months (range 3-176). A total of 211 (36.3%) RPs were performed from 2005-2010, while 370 (63.9%) were performed from 2011-2019. The median age at RP was 65 years (range 44-81). Following the introduction of an enhanced care pathway, there were significant decreases in intraoperative blood loss (350 ml vs. 200 ml; p=0.0001) and the use of surgical drains (90% vs. 9.5%; p=0.0001). The median LOS over the whole study period was one day (range 1-7), which significantly decreased with the enhanced care pathway (3 vs. 1 day; p=0.0001). Since introducing the enhanced care pathway in 2011, 344 (93%) patients were discharged day 1 following surgery. There were no differences in post-discharge presentations to the emergency department (5.7% vs. 9%; p=0.15) or 30-day readmission rates (3.8% vs. 3.8%; p=1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

A single-night stay for open RP is safe and achievable for most patients. A dedicated, multifaceted pathway is required to attain targets for a safe and timely discharge.

摘要

引言

鉴于加拿大并非所有患者都能接受机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP),本研究旨在评估强化护理路径对开放性根治性前列腺切除术(RP)住院时间(LOS)的影响。

方法

对所有实施的RP手术进行回顾性研究。2011年为RP手术建立了强化护理路径。对路径引入前(2005 - 2010年)和引入后(2011 - 2019年)的患者进行比较。

结果

在研究期间,由一名外科医生实施了581例RP手术,中位随访时间为66.9个月(范围3 - 176个月)。2005 - 2010年共实施了211例(36.3%)RP手术,而2011 - 2019年实施了370例(63.9%)。RP手术时的中位年龄为65岁(范围44 - 81岁)。引入强化护理路径后,术中失血量显著减少(350毫升对200毫升;p = 0.0001),手术引流管的使用也显著减少(90%对9.5%;p = 0.0001)。整个研究期间的中位住院时间为1天(范围1 - 7天),强化护理路径使其显著缩短(3天对1天;p = 0.0001)。自2011年引入强化护理路径以来,344例(93%)患者术后第1天出院。出院后到急诊科就诊情况(5.7%对9%;p = 0.15)或30天再入院率(3.8%对3.8%;p = 1.00)无差异。

结论

对于大多数患者而言,开放性RP术后单晚住院是安全可行的。需要一条专门的、多方面的路径来实现安全及时出院的目标。

相似文献

1
Single-night stay for open radical prostatectomy.开放性根治性前列腺切除术的单晚住院
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Mar;15(3):E130-E134. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6600.
2
Patterns-of-care and health economic analysis of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Australian public health system.澳大利亚公共卫生系统中机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的护理模式与健康经济分析。
BJU Int. 2016 Jun;117(6):930-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13317. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
3
The British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) radical prostatectomy audit 2014/2015 - an update on current practice and outcomes by centre and surgeon case-volume.英国泌尿外科学会(BAUS)2014/2015 年根治性前列腺切除术审核——按中心和外科医生手术量更新当前实践和结果
BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):886-892. doi: 10.1111/bju.14156. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
4
The effect of minimally invasive prostatectomy on practice patterns of American urologists.微创前列腺切除术对美国泌尿外科医生执业模式的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2016 Jun;34(6):255.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
5
Comparison of 90-day re-admission rates between open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic RP (LRP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).比较开放经耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术(RRP)、腹腔镜前列腺切除术(LRP)和机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)术后 90 天再入院率。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E966-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11183.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
6
Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术住院时间的比较。
J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):929-31. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.070.
7
Same Day Discharge after Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的当日出院。
J Urol. 2019 Nov;202(5):959-963. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000353. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
8
Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.微创根治性前列腺切除术:从单纯腹腔镜手术向机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的转变。
Arch Esp Urol. 2011 Oct;64(8):823-9.
9
Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: an Australian single-surgeon series.腹腔镜与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:澳大利亚单中心单术者系列研究
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Mar;85(3):154-8. doi: 10.1111/ans.12602. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
10
Contemporary Comparison of Open to Robotic Prostatectomy at a Veteran's Affairs Hospital.一家退伍军人事务医院开放式与机器人辅助前列腺切除术的当代比较
Mil Med. 2019 May 1;184(5-6):e330-e337. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy352.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of unplanned hospital visits and re-admissions following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后非计划性医院就诊和再入院情况的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Oct;15(10):E531-E544. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6931.

本文引用的文献

1
Same-day discharge surgery for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the era of ERAS and prehabilitation pathways: a contemporary, comparative, feasibility study.加速康复外科和术前康复路径时代机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的当日出院手术:一项当代、对比、可行性研究。
World J Urol. 2022 Jun;40(6):1359-1365. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03119-w. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
2
Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Between Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy at 24-month Follow-up in the Swedish LAPPRO Trial.在瑞典 LAPPRO 试验中,24 个月随访时开放与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的功能与肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Oct;1(5):353-360. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
3
Same Day Discharge after Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的当日出院。
J Urol. 2019 Nov;202(5):959-963. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000353. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
4
Contemporary National Assessment of Robot-Assisted Surgery Rates and Total Hospital Charges for Major Surgical Uro-Oncological Procedures in the United States.当代美国机器人辅助手术率及主要泌尿外科手术总住院费用的全国评估
J Endourol. 2019 Jun;33(6):438-447. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0840.
5
A comparative study of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in 10 790 men treated by highly trained surgeons for both procedures.一项比较研究,纳入 10790 名接受过高度训练的外科医生进行机器人辅助和开放根治性前列腺切除术的男性,两组手术均为这些外科医生进行。
BJU Int. 2019 Jun;123(6):1031-1040. doi: 10.1111/bju.14760. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
6
Variation in prostate surgery costs and outcomes in the USA: robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy.美国前列腺手术费用和结果的差异:机器人辅助手术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术。
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Feb;8(3):143-155. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0109. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
7
Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.接受腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者术后加速康复方案
J Int Med Res. 2019 Jan;47(1):114-121. doi: 10.1177/0300060518796758. Epub 2018 Sep 9.
8
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放经耻骨后前列腺根治术的比较:一项随机对照研究的 24 个月结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1051-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30357-7. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
9
Safety and feasibility of outpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.门诊机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的安全性与可行性
J Robot Surg. 2019 Apr;13(2):261-265. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0848-8. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
10
Postoperative complications of contemporary open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using standardised reporting systems.当代开放和机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的标准化报告系统的术后并发症。
BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):801-807. doi: 10.1111/bju.14369. Epub 2018 Jun 4.