• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价药师主导的心房颤动患者共同决策和患者满意度的试点研究:一项前后对照研究。

Evaluation of a pharmacist-led shared decision-making in atrial fibrillation and patients' satisfaction-a before and after pilot study.

机构信息

Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, 3199, Australia.

Monash University, Clayton , Vic 3800, Australia.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2021 May;190(2):819-824. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02343-y. Epub 2020 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-020-02343-y
PMID:32808181
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic complex diseases like atrial fibrillation have potential long-term economical and personal consequences. Shared decision-making principles may promote therapeutic compliance, satisfaction and outcomes. Pharmacists, as patient-advocates, play a key role in guiding them through complex clinical decisions about their chronic disease management and anticoagulation choices.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of pharmacist-led shared decision making on patients' satisfaction and appropriateness of their anticoagulation therapy in newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation patients.

METHODS

A prospective 2-phase before and after single-centre study was conducted in an Australian hospital. Phase 1 provided usual care, and patients' satisfaction and appropriateness of their anticoagulation therapy were evaluated. Phase-2 assessed the impact on satisfaction and appropriateness of anticoagulant therapy following pharmacist-led interventions of shared decision making to promote patients' involvement.

RESULTS

Patients with pharmacist-led shared decision making reported higher degree of appropriateness of anticoagulation therapy and satisfaction (36% vs 92%, P < 0.001; 25% vs 68, P < 0.001), respectively. Additionally, patients who had a pharmacist input during their hospital stay received guideline-recommended anticoagulant therapy and reported satisfaction with their management was also higher in stage 2 (21% vs 65%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The study highlights pharmacist-led shared decision making in atrial fibrillation that contributes to patient satisfaction and appropriateness of therapy.

摘要

背景

心房颤动等慢性复杂疾病具有潜在的长期经济和个人后果。共同决策原则可以促进治疗依从性、满意度和结果。药剂师作为患者的倡导者,在指导他们做出关于慢性病管理和抗凝选择的复杂临床决策方面发挥着关键作用。

目的

评估由药剂师主导的共同决策对新诊断为心房颤动患者的满意度和抗凝治疗的适当性的影响。

方法

在澳大利亚的一家医院进行了一项前瞻性的 2 期单中心研究。第 1 阶段提供常规护理,并评估患者的满意度和抗凝治疗的适当性。第 2 阶段评估了在药剂师主导的共同决策干预措施下促进患者参与对满意度和抗凝治疗适当性的影响。

结果

接受药剂师主导的共同决策的患者报告了更高程度的抗凝治疗适当性和满意度(36%对 92%,P<0.001;25%对 68%,P<0.001)。此外,在住院期间接受药剂师干预的患者接受了指南推荐的抗凝治疗,并且在第 2 阶段报告对其管理的满意度也更高(21%对 65%,p<0.001)。

结论

该研究强调了心房颤动中由药剂师主导的共同决策有助于提高患者的满意度和治疗的适当性。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a pharmacist-led shared decision-making in atrial fibrillation and patients' satisfaction-a before and after pilot study.评价药师主导的心房颤动患者共同决策和患者满意度的试点研究:一项前后对照研究。
Ir J Med Sci. 2021 May;190(2):819-824. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02343-y. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
2
Assessment of Shared Decision-making for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.评估心房颤动患者卒中预防的共同决策:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1;180(9):1215-1224. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2908.
3
Improving shared decision-making in pharmacist-led haematology clinics: a 'Plan Do Study Act' approach.提高药剂师主导的血液学临床中共同决策的质量:“计划-执行-研究-行动”方法。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Nov;28(Suppl 2):e180-e184. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-002726. Epub 2021 May 26.
4
Pharmacist-led intervention for older people with atrial fibrillation in long-term care (PIVOTALL study): a randomised pilot and feasibility study.药师主导的长期护理中心老年心房颤动患者干预(PIVOTALL 研究):一项随机试点和可行性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 16;24(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04527-4.
5
Optimizing the use of oral anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrilation in primary care: a pharmacist-led intervention.优化初级保健中心心房颤动患者口服抗凝治疗的应用:一项药剂师主导的干预措施。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Feb;39(1):173-180. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0419-x. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
6
Factors associated with confidence in decision making and satisfaction with risk communication among patients with atrial fibrillation.与房颤患者决策信心及风险沟通满意度相关的因素。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Jun;17(5):446-455. doi: 10.1177/1474515117741891. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
7
Developing an Atrial Fibrillation Guideline Support Tool (AFGuST) for shared decision making.开发用于共同决策的心房颤动指南支持工具(AFGuST)。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Apr;31(4):603-14. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1019608. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
8
Shared decision making for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.心房颤动中风预防的共同决策:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Sep 29;18(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2178-y.
9
Evaluating the Effect of a Patient Decision Aid for Atrial Fibrillation Stroke Prevention Therapy.评估患者决策辅助工具在心房颤动卒中预防治疗中的效果。
Ann Pharmacother. 2019 Jul;53(7):665-674. doi: 10.1177/1060028019828420. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
10
Patients' and physicians' perceptions and attitudes about oral anticoagulation and atrial fibrillation: a qualitative systematic review.患者与医生对口服抗凝治疗及心房颤动的认知与态度:一项定性系统评价
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Jan 13;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0574-0.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of pharmacists in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.药剂师在心房颤动患者管理中的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2025 Aug 31:17151635251365148. doi: 10.1177/17151635251365148.
2
The effect of pharmacist-led interventions on the appropriateness and clinical outcomes of anticoagulant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.药师主导的干预措施对抗凝治疗的适宜性和临床结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2024 Sep 13;10(6):488-506. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae045.
3
A novel shared decision-making (SDM) tool for anticoagulation management in atrial fibrillation: protocol for a prospective, cluster randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration With the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.2019年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会对2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会心房颤动患者管理指南的聚焦更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组和心律学会与胸外科医师协会合作报告
Circulation. 2019 Jul 9;140(2):e125-e151. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000665. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
2
An education intervention to improve health literacy and decision making about supporting self-care among older Australians: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项旨在提高澳大利亚老年人健康素养及自我护理支持决策能力的教育干预措施:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Sep 26;18(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2182-2.
3
一种用于心房颤动抗凝管理的新型共享决策(SDM)工具:一项前瞻性、聚类随机对照试验的方案。
Trials. 2023 Oct 2;24(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07667-5.
4
The prognostic value of quality of life in atrial fibrillation on patient value.生活质量对房颤患者价值的预后意义。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Apr 5;21(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02112-2.
5
Shared decision-making practices and patient values in pharmacist outpatient care for rheumatic disease: A multiple correspondence analysis.风湿性疾病药师门诊护理中的共同决策实践和患者价值观:多对应分析。
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2023 Jan 20;26:11135. doi: 10.3389/jpps.2023.11135. eCollection 2023.
6
Optimizing adherence and persistence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant therapy in atrial fibrillation.优化心房颤动患者非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝治疗的依从性和持续性
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2022 Feb 14;24(Suppl A):A42-A55. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suab152. eCollection 2022 Feb.
Optimizing the use of oral anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrilation in primary care: a pharmacist-led intervention.优化初级保健中心心房颤动患者口服抗凝治疗的应用:一项药剂师主导的干预措施。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Feb;39(1):173-180. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0419-x. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
4
Shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症中的共同决策
Mult Scler. 2017 Feb;23(2):185-190. doi: 10.1177/1352458516671204. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
Impact of pharmacist intervention on adherence and measurable patient outcomes among depressed patients: a randomised controlled study.药剂师干预对抑郁症患者依从性和可测量的患者结局的影响:一项随机对照研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Sep 16;15:219. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0605-8.
6
Medication decision making and patient outcomes in GP, nurse and pharmacist prescriber consultations.全科医生、护士和药剂师开处方咨询中的用药决策与患者治疗结果
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015 Sep;16(5):513-27. doi: 10.1017/S146342361400053X. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
7
Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: a meta-analysis.患者偏好影响治疗满意度、治疗完成情况及临床结局:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2014 Aug;34(6):506-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
8
A comparison of usual care, a patient-centred education intervention and motivational interviewing to improve medication adherence and readmissions of adults in an acute-care setting.在急性护理环境中,比较常规护理、以患者为中心的教育干预和动机性访谈对提高成年人药物依从性及再入院率的效果。
J Nurs Manag. 2014 Apr;22(3):350-61. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12221. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
9
Influence of decision aids on patient preferences for anticoagulant therapy: a randomized trial.决策辅助工具对抗凝治疗患者偏好的影响:一项随机试验。
CMAJ. 2007 May 22;176(11):1583-7. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060837.