Pharmacy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Medicines Use and Safety, NHS Specialist Pharmacy Service, England and London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, Middlesex, UK.
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Nov;28(Suppl 2):e180-e184. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-002726. Epub 2021 May 26.
The concept of person-centred care is regarded as an essential approach to healthcare. A core component of person-centred care is the shared decision-making process. There is evidence that effective shared decision-making can improve people's satisfaction with their care. This quality improvement project used the 'Plan Do Study Act' (PDSA) cycles to test the small changes made and to assess their impact on shared decision-making in clinic consultations.
To enhance patient satisfaction in pharmacist-led haematology clinics by improving shared decision-making.
Patients from a haematology clinic participated in a survey based on the validated 'Benefit, Risk, Alternatives, do Nothing' (BRAN) questions, which encourage patients' involvement in shared decision-making conversations with clinicians. Data were collected from 142 consultations over 3 months, using three PDSA cycles, which provided the structure to implement changes, evaluate their impact, and build on the learning from previous cycles. The first cycle analysed the shared decision-making in the clinic. The second cycle involved shared decision-making training for pharmacists. On the third cycle, decision-making aid leaflets were implemented.
First cycle results showed patients were mostly satisfied with the 'Benefit' statement. The second cycle revealed satisfaction improvements on 'Risk'. On the third cycle, satisfaction increased on the 'do Nothing' statement. The baseline mean of the patient satisfaction score increased from 3.25/5 at the start to 3.75/5 by the end of the study.
The results show that each cycle had a positive effect, suggesting that training specialist pharmacists in person-centred care and shared decision-making led to an improvement in patient satisfaction. Encouraging patients to be involved in shared decision-making enabled them to ask questions in consultations and led to improved satisfaction. The project highlighted the importance of developing the skills and knowledge of the pharmacy workforce to support the needs of an expanding and ageing cancer population.
以患者为中心的护理理念被视为医疗保健的重要方法。以患者为中心护理的核心组成部分是共同决策过程。有证据表明,有效的共同决策可以提高人们对护理的满意度。本质量改进项目使用“计划-执行-研究-行动”(PDSA)循环来测试所做的小改动,并评估其对临床咨询中共同决策的影响。
通过改善共同决策,提高药剂师主导的血液科诊所患者的满意度。
血液科诊所的患者参与了一项基于经过验证的“获益、风险、替代方案、不作为”(BRAN)问题的调查,该调查鼓励患者参与与临床医生的共同决策对话。在 3 个月内,通过三个 PDSA 循环收集了 142 次咨询的数据,为实施变更、评估其影响以及从之前的循环中吸取经验提供了结构。第一个循环分析了诊所中的共同决策。第二个循环涉及对药剂师进行共同决策培训。第三个循环实施了决策辅助传单。
第一循环的结果表明,患者对“获益”陈述大多感到满意。第二循环显示,“风险”陈述的满意度有所提高。在第三循环中,“不作为”陈述的满意度增加。基线患者满意度评分从研究开始时的 3.25/5 增加到研究结束时的 3.75/5。
结果表明每个循环都有积极的影响,这表明培训专业药剂师以患者为中心的护理和共同决策导致患者满意度提高。鼓励患者参与共同决策使他们能够在咨询中提出问题,并提高了满意度。该项目强调了发展药剂师队伍的技能和知识以满足不断扩大和老龄化的癌症人群需求的重要性。