Institute of Interdisciplinary Research, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
Rev Med Virol. 2021 Jan;31(1):1-6. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2152. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
SARS-CoV-2 and Covid-19 have made a retrospective analysis of other coronavirus diseases important, so this article reviews the history of the SARS-CoV viral disease from 2003. Standard and clinical chemistry diagnostics were developed in response to the outbreak. The response to SARS is examined to determine if there were lessons learned before it disappeared in June and July 2003. Various diagnostic approaches were developed and implemented to assist in the rapid identification of patients and treatment of their illness, yet many of the approaches required days or weeks from the onset of fever to show statistical significance. Most of the therapeutic methods used during the outbreak relied on treating symptoms of the underlying illness, such as lower respiratory infections and systemic infection, rather than effectively suppressing or curtailing replication of the virus. Retrospective studies are examined to determine how the SARS outbreak was viewed 10 years on and what the authors hoped would be instructive patterns for possible future pandemics. Implementation of some of these recommendations might have helped ease the current pandemic but were overlooked for budgetary reasons that seem short-sighted at present.
SARS-CoV-2 和 COVID-19 使得对其他冠状病毒疾病进行回顾性分析变得很重要,因此本文回顾了 2003 年 SARS-CoV 病毒疾病的历史。针对此次疫情开发了标准和临床化学诊断方法。检查对 SARS 的反应,以确定在 2003 年 6 月和 7 月消失之前是否吸取了教训。开发并实施了各种诊断方法以帮助快速识别患者并治疗其疾病,但许多方法需要从发烧开始数天或数周后才能显示出统计学意义。在疫情爆发期间使用的大多数治疗方法都依赖于治疗潜在疾病的症状,例如下呼吸道感染和全身感染,而不是有效抑制或阻断病毒的复制。本文回顾了回顾性研究,以确定 SARS 爆发 10 年后的情况,以及作者希望为可能的未来大流行提供哪些有指导意义的模式。实施其中一些建议可能有助于缓解当前的大流行,但由于预算原因而被忽视,目前看来这些原因是目光短浅的。