• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

积极的居家医师主导型缓和医疗模式及其相关的居家死亡、非计划性急诊就诊和非计划性住院的绩效指标。

An Active In-Home Physician Model of Palliative Care and Its Resulting Performance Indicators Related to Home Deaths, Unplanned Emergency Department Visits and Unplanned Hospital Admissions.

机构信息

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

152971Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Palliat Care. 2021 Jan;36(1):46-49. doi: 10.1177/0825859720951368. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1177/0825859720951368
PMID:32808567
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited research has characterized team-based models of home palliative care and the outcomes of patients supported by these care teams.

CASE PRESENTATION

A retrospective case series describing care and outcomes of patients managed by the London Home Palliative Care Team between May 1, 2017 and April 1, 2019.

CASE MANAGEMENT

The London Home Palliative Care (LHPC) Team care model is based upon 3 pillars: 1) physician visit availability 2) active patient-centered care with strong physician in-home presence and 3) optimal administrative organization.

CASE OUTCOMES

In the 18 month study period, 354 patients received care from the London Home Palliative Care Team. Most significantly, 88.4% ( = 313) died in the community or at a designated palliative care unit after prearranged direct transfer; no comparable provincial data is available. 21.2% ( 75) patients visited an emergency department and 24.6% ( 87) were admitted to hospital at least once in their final 30 days of life. 280 (79.1%) died in the community. These values are better than comparable provincial estimates of 62.7%, 61.7%, and 24.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The London Home Palliative Care (LHPC) Team model appears to favorably impact community death rate, ER visits and unplanned hospital admissions, as compared to accepted provincial data. Studies to determine if this model is reproducible could support palliative care teams achieving similar results.

摘要

背景

有限的研究描述了基于团队的家庭姑息治疗模式以及这些护理团队支持的患者的结局。

病例介绍

一项回顾性病例系列研究,描述了 2017 年 5 月 1 日至 2019 年 4 月 1 日期间伦敦家庭姑息治疗团队管理的患者的护理和结局。

病例管理

伦敦家庭姑息治疗(LHPC)团队的护理模式基于 3 个支柱:1)医生访问的可用性;2)以患者为中心的积极护理,医生在家中进行强有力的干预;3)最佳的行政组织。

病例结果

在 18 个月的研究期间,354 名患者接受了伦敦家庭姑息治疗团队的治疗。最重要的是,88.4%(=313)的患者在社区或指定的姑息治疗病房去世,这些患者在预先安排的直接转院后去世;没有可比的省级数据。21.2%(75)的患者去了急诊室,24.6%(87)的患者在生命的最后 30 天至少住院一次。280 名(79.1%)患者在社区死亡。这些数值均优于可比的省级估计值,分别为 62.7%、61.7%和 24.0%。

结论

与公认的省级数据相比,伦敦家庭姑息治疗(LHPC)团队模式似乎对社区死亡率、急诊室就诊和非计划住院有积极影响。确定该模式是否具有可复制性的研究可以支持姑息治疗团队取得类似的结果。

相似文献

1
An Active In-Home Physician Model of Palliative Care and Its Resulting Performance Indicators Related to Home Deaths, Unplanned Emergency Department Visits and Unplanned Hospital Admissions.积极的居家医师主导型缓和医疗模式及其相关的居家死亡、非计划性急诊就诊和非计划性住院的绩效指标。
J Palliat Care. 2021 Jan;36(1):46-49. doi: 10.1177/0825859720951368. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
2
Home hospitalization for palliative cancer care: factors associated with unplanned hospital admissions and death in hospital.居家姑息治疗癌症患者的住院治疗:与非计划性入院和院内死亡相关的因素。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jan 26;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00720-7.
3
Impact of physician-based palliative care delivery models on health care utilization outcomes: A population-based retrospective cohort study.基于医生的姑息治疗提供模式对医疗保健利用结果的影响:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2021 Jun;35(6):1170-1180. doi: 10.1177/02692163211009440. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
4
Community Palliative Care Initiatives to Reduce End-of-Life Hospital Utilization and In-Hospital Deaths: A Population-Based Observational Study Evaluating Two Home Care Interventions.社区姑息治疗计划以减少临终医院利用和院内死亡:一项基于人群的观察性研究评估两种家庭护理干预措施。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Aug;58(2):181-189.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.021. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
5
Impact of community based, specialist palliative care teams on hospitalisations and emergency department visits late in life and hospital deaths: a pooled analysis.基于社区的专科姑息治疗团队对终末期住院、急诊就诊和院内死亡的影响:一项汇总分析。
BMJ. 2014 Jun 6;348:g3496. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3496.
6
Association between palliative care and healthcare outcomes among adults with terminal non-cancer illness: population based matched cohort study.姑息治疗与终末期非癌症成人医疗结局的关联:基于人群的匹配队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 6;370:m2257. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2257.
7
Impact of the Regional Palliative Care Pathway on Emergency Room Visits and Hospitalizations.区域舒缓治疗路径对急诊就诊和住院的影响。
Anticancer Res. 2021 Mar;41(3):1701-1706. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14934.
8
End-of-life care pathway of head and neck cancer patients: single-institution experience.头颈部癌症患者的临终关怀路径:单机构经验
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Feb;275(2):545-551. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4843-x. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
9
Associations between physician home visits for the dying and place of death: A population-based retrospective cohort study.临终关怀医生家访与死亡地点之间的关联:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 15;13(2):e0191322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191322. eCollection 2018.
10
Does early palliative identification improve the use of palliative care services?早期姑息识别是否能提高姑息治疗服务的使用?
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 31;15(1):e0226597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226597. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Supporting the Heterogeneous and Evolving Treatment Preferences of Patients With Heart Failure Through Collaborative Home-Based Palliative Care.通过协作式居家姑息治疗支持心力衰竭患者的异质且不断变化的治疗偏好。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Oct 4;11(19):e026319. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026319. Epub 2022 Sep 29.