School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Shanghai Changning-ECNU Mental Health Center, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Dec;41(17):4964-4981. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25173. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
This study investigated the gender differences in deception and their neural basis in the perspective of two-person neuroscience. Both male and female dyads were asked to perform a face-to-face spontaneous sender-receiver deception task, while their neural activities in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and right temporal parietal junction (rTPJ) were recorded simultaneously using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)-based hyperscanning. Male and female dyads displayed similar deception rate, successful deception rate, and eye contact in deception trials. Moreover, eye contact in deception trials was positively correlated with the success rate of deception in both genders. The fNIRS data showed that the interpersonal neural synchronization (INS) in PFC was significantly enhanced only in female dyads when performed the deception task, while INS in rTPJ was increased only in male dyads. Such INS was correlated with the success rate of deception in both dyads. Granger causality analysis showed that no significant directionality between time series of PFC (or rTPJ) in each dyad, which could indicate that sender and receiver played equally important role during deception task. Finally, enhanced INS in PFC in female dyads mediated the contribution of eye contact to the success rate of deception. All findings in this study suggest that differential patterns of INS are recruited when male and female dyads perform the face-to-face deception task. To our knowledge, this is the first interbrain evidence for gender difference of successful deception, which could make us a deeper understanding of spontaneous face-to-face deception.
本研究从二人神经科学的角度探讨了欺骗行为中的性别差异及其神经基础。要求男性和女性二人组进行面对面的自发发送者-接收者欺骗任务,同时使用基于功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)的超扫描技术同步记录他们前额叶皮层(PFC)和右侧颞顶联合区(rTPJ)的神经活动。男性和女性二人组在欺骗试验中表现出相似的欺骗率、成功欺骗率和欺骗时的眼神接触。此外,欺骗试验中的眼神接触与两种性别欺骗的成功率呈正相关。fNIRS 数据显示,只有在女性二人组进行欺骗任务时,PFC 中的人际神经同步(INS)才会显著增强,而 rTPJ 中的 INS 仅在男性二人组中增加。这种 INS 与两个二人组的欺骗成功率相关。格兰杰因果分析表明,每个二人组中 PFC(或 rTPJ)的时间序列之间没有显著的方向性,这可能表明在欺骗任务中,发送者和接收者发挥着同等重要的作用。最后,女性二人组中 PFC 的增强 INS 介导了眼神接触对欺骗成功率的贡献。本研究中的所有发现表明,当男性和女性二人组进行面对面的欺骗任务时,会招募到不同模式的 INS。据我们所知,这是首次关于成功欺骗的性别差异的脑间证据,这可以使我们更深入地了解自发的面对面欺骗。