• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当面说谎:性别与欺骗动机

Face-to-Face Lying: Gender and Motivation to Deceive.

作者信息

Elaad Eitan, Gonen-Gal Ye'ela

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 22;13:820923. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.820923. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.820923
PMID:35391990
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8982912/
Abstract

Two studies examined gender differences in lying when the truth-telling bias prevailed (study 1) and when inspiring lying and disbelief (study 2). The first study used 156 community participants (91 women) in pairs. First, participants completed the Narcissistic Personality Inventory, the Lie- and Truth Ability Assessment Scale (LTAAS), and the Rational-Experiential Inventory. Then, they participated in a deception game where they performed as senders and receivers of true and false communications. Their goal was to retain as many points as possible according to a payoff matrix that specified the reward they would gain for any possible outcome. Results indicated that men lied more and were more successful lie-tellers than women. In addition, men believed the sender less than women but were not more successful detectors of lies and truths. Higher perceived lie-telling ability, narcissistic features, and experiential thinking style explained men's performance. The second study used 100 volunteers (40 women) who underwent the same procedure. However, the payoff matrix encouraged lying and disbelieving. Results showed again that men lied more than women. As to performance, men were more successful lie detectors than women, but there was no truth detection difference. Women did not differ in their success in telling and detecting lies and truths. The inconsistent gender differences in production and detection lies and truths dictate caution in interpreting them.

摘要

两项研究考察了在讲真话偏差占主导时(研究1)以及在鼓励说谎和不信任时(研究2)说谎行为中的性别差异。第一项研究使用了156名社区参与者(91名女性),两人一组。首先,参与者完成了自恋人格量表、说谎与说真话能力评估量表(LTAAS)以及理性-经验量表。然后,他们参与了一个欺骗游戏,在游戏中他们分别扮演真假信息的发送者和接收者。他们的目标是根据一个收益矩阵尽可能多地保留分数,该矩阵规定了他们在任何可能结果下将获得的奖励。结果表明,男性比女性说谎更多,且作为说谎者更成功。此外,男性比女性更不信任发送者,但在辨别谎言和真话方面并不更成功。更高的说谎能力感知、自恋特征和经验性思维方式解释了男性的表现。第二项研究使用了100名志愿者(40名女性),他们经历了相同的程序。然而,收益矩阵鼓励说谎和不信任。结果再次表明,男性比女性说谎更多。在表现方面,男性作为谎言辨别者比女性更成功,但在辨别真话方面没有差异。女性在说真话和辨别谎言与真话方面的成功率没有差异。在说谎和辨别谎言与真话方面不一致的性别差异表明在解释这些差异时要谨慎。

相似文献

1
Face-to-Face Lying: Gender and Motivation to Deceive.当面说谎:性别与欺骗动机
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 22;13:820923. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.820923. eCollection 2022.
2
People lie less when they put on a medical face mask.人们戴上医用口罩后说谎的次数会减少。
Heliyon. 2023 Feb;9(2):e13757. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13757. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
3
The relations between deception, narcissism and self-assessed lie- and truth-related abilities.欺骗、自恋与自我评估的说谎及与真相相关能力之间的关系。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 May 5;27(5):880-893. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1751328. eCollection 2020.
4
Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample?欺骗的线索:在说意大利语的样本中,并发症、常识细节和自我设限策略能否区分真话、隐含谎言和直白谎言?
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 26;14:1128194. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128194. eCollection 2023.
5
On Lies and Hard Truths.论谎言与残酷的真相。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 7;12:687913. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.687913. eCollection 2021.
6
Children's second-order lying: Young children can tell the truth to deceive.儿童的二阶说谎:幼儿会通过讲真话来进行欺骗。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Dec;176:128-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
7
An empirical test of the decision to lie component of the Activation-Decision-Construction-Action Theory (ADCAT).对激活-决策-构建-行动理论(ADCAT)中说谎决策部分的实证检验。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Sep;169:45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 22.
8
Applying the verifiability approach to deception detection in alibi witness situations.将可验证性方法应用于不在场证人情况下的欺骗检测。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Mar;204:103020. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103020. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
9
Let the man choose what to do: Neural correlates of spontaneous lying and truth-telling.让受试者选择做什么:自发说谎与说实话的神经关联。
Brain Cogn. 2016 Feb;102:13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
10
It's the deceiver, not the receiver: No individual differences when detecting deception in a foreign and a native language.是欺骗者,而不是接收者:在检测外语和母语中的欺骗时没有个体差异。
PLoS One. 2018 May 3;13(5):e0196384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196384. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Lying about money and game points by men and women and its relation to the Self-Reported Lying Scale.男性和女性在金钱及游戏点数方面的说谎行为及其与自我报告说谎量表的关系。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 17;14:1304237. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1304237. eCollection 2023.
2
The effect of lying on memory in daily life: Does motivation matter?日常生活中说谎对记忆的影响:动机重要吗?
Psych J. 2024 Apr;13(2):216-226. doi: 10.1002/pchj.709. Epub 2023 Dec 17.
3
Individual differences in self-reported lie detection abilities.个体在自我报告的谎言检测能力上的差异。
PLoS One. 2023 May 24;18(5):e0285124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285124. eCollection 2023.
4
People lie less when they put on a medical face mask.人们戴上医用口罩后说谎的次数会减少。
Heliyon. 2023 Feb;9(2):e13757. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13757. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

本文引用的文献

1
A few prolific liars in Japan: Replication and the effects of Dark Triad personality traits.日本一些多产的说谎者:复制和黑暗人格特质的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 15;16(4):e0249815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249815. eCollection 2021.
2
The relations between deception, narcissism and self-assessed lie- and truth-related abilities.欺骗、自恋与自我评估的说谎及与真相相关能力之间的关系。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 May 5;27(5):880-893. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1751328. eCollection 2020.
3
Neural alignment during face-to-face spontaneous deception: Does gender make a difference?面对面自发欺骗时的神经一致性:性别有影响吗?
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Dec;41(17):4964-4981. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25173. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
4
Frequent Countermeasure Usage by Narcissistic Examinees in the Concealed Information Test.自恋型应试者在隐蔽信息测试中频繁使用应对策略。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 10;10:1068. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01068. eCollection 2019.
5
The truth about lies: A meta-analysis on dishonest behavior.关于谎言的真相:不诚实行为的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2019 Jan;145(1):1-44. doi: 10.1037/bul0000174.
6
The Dark Triad and the PID-5 Maladaptive Personality Traits: Accuracy, Confidence and Response Bias in Judgments of Veracity.黑暗三性格与人格五因素模型中的适应不良人格特质:真实性判断中的准确性、信心和反应偏差
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 21;8:1549. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01549. eCollection 2017.
7
The Malevolent Side of Human Nature.人性的阴暗面
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Mar;12(2):183-204. doi: 10.1177/1745691616666070.
8
Narcissism and Self-Insight: A Review and Meta-Analysis of Narcissists' Self-Enhancement Tendencies.自恋与自我洞察:对自恋者自我提升倾向的综述与元分析
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Jan;42(1):3-24. doi: 10.1177/0146167215611636. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
9
The morality of larks and owls: unethical behavior depends on chronotype as well as time of day.百灵鸟型与猫头鹰型的道德观念:不道德行为既取决于昼夜节律类型,也取决于一天中的时间。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Dec;25(12):2272-4. doi: 10.1177/0956797614541989. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
10
Deception detection, transmission, and modality in age and sex.年龄与性别相关的欺骗检测、传递和模态。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 13;5:590. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00590. eCollection 2014.