• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面部手术瘢痕的自然演变:使用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表在两个时间点评估医师评估的瘢痕的回顾性研究。

The Natural Evolution of Facial Surgical Scars: A Retrospective Study of Physician-Assessed Scars Using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Over Two Time Points.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.

Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021 Sep;23(5):330-338. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0228. Epub 2020 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1089/fpsam.2020.0228
PMID:32808822
Abstract

The natural evolution of facial scars has not been well described. Identifying factors that correlate with optimal scar healing may help patients and physicians during the perioperative period. A retrospective study of 108 facial skin cancer patient scars was performed. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was used to grade scars at two time points (1 week and 3 months postoperatively). Paired two-tailed -tests identified differences in scar ratings between the time points. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) explored whether POSAS scores differed by anatomic site or reconstruction type. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to identify if 1-week scar appearance correlated with scar appearance at 3 months. Between 1 week and 3 months the total POSAS score improved by 36.3% and overall opinion of the scar improved by 38.6% ( < 0.001). Facial cosmetic units differed in their 1-week and 3-month scores and all anatomic sites demonstrated significant improvement between time points. Differential scoring occurred among reconstruction types. Scar appearance at 1 week was able to predict overall scar appearance at the 3-month visit (area under the curve = 0.7732). Early scar appearance predicts later scar appearance, and scars will improve by nearly 40% 3 months after surgery. These data can be used to assist with perioperative counseling and expectation management.

摘要

面部疤痕的自然演变尚未得到很好的描述。确定与最佳疤痕愈合相关的因素可能有助于患者和医生在围手术期。对 108 例面部皮肤癌患者的疤痕进行了回顾性研究。使用患者和观察者疤痕评估量表 (POSAS) 在两个时间点(术后 1 周和 3 个月)对疤痕进行分级。配对双侧 t 检验确定了时间点之间疤痕评分的差异。方差分析 (ANOVA) 探讨了 POSAS 评分是否因解剖部位或重建类型而异。进行了受试者工作特征分析,以确定 1 周时的疤痕外观是否与 3 个月时的疤痕外观相关。在 1 周和 3 个月之间,POSAS 总分改善了 36.3%,对疤痕的总体看法改善了 38.6%(<0.001)。面部美容单位在其 1 周和 3 个月的评分上存在差异,所有解剖部位在时间点之间均显示出显著改善。重建类型之间存在差异评分。1 周时的疤痕外观能够预测 3 个月时的总体疤痕外观(曲线下面积 = 0.7732)。早期疤痕外观可预测后期疤痕外观,术后 3 个月疤痕将改善近 40%。这些数据可用于协助围手术期咨询和预期管理。

相似文献

1
The Natural Evolution of Facial Surgical Scars: A Retrospective Study of Physician-Assessed Scars Using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Over Two Time Points.面部手术瘢痕的自然演变:使用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表在两个时间点评估医师评估的瘢痕的回顾性研究。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021 Sep;23(5):330-338. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0228. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
2
Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and a 4-point scale in evaluating linear facial surgical scars.患者及观察者瘢痕评估量表与4分制量表在评估面部线性手术瘢痕中的可靠性
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Feb;31(2):341-346. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13805. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
3
Patient-and observer-reported long-term scar quality of wide local excision scars in melanoma patients.患者及观察者报告的黑色素瘤患者广泛局部切除瘢痕的长期瘢痕质量
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018 Dec;52(6):319-324. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2018.1493388. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
4
Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.瘢痕美观评估和分级(SCAR)量表作为术后瘢痕的一种结局测量工具,其可靠性和照片等效性。
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Jan 1;153(1):55-60. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.3757.
5
Fractional CO laser treatment of caesarean section scars-A randomized controlled split-scar trial with long term follow-up assessment.二氧化碳点阵激光治疗剖宫产瘢痕——一项长期随访评估的随机对照半侧瘢痕试验
Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Feb;49(2):189-197. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22606. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
6
Perceptions of Aesthetic Outcome of Linear vs Multiple Z-Plasty Scars in a National Survey.线性与多 Z 成形术瘢痕的美学效果在全国性调查中的认知。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016 Jul 1;18(4):263-7. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.0107.
7
Early postoperative single treatment ablative fractional lasing of Mohs micrographic surgery facial scars: a split-scar, evaluator-blinded study.Mohs显微外科手术面部瘢痕术后早期单次剥脱性分次激光治疗:一项瘢痕对分、评估者盲法研究
Lasers Surg Med. 2015 Jan;47(1):1-5. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22314. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
8
Use of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale for evaluation of facial scars treated with self-drying silicone gel.使用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表评估自干性硅胶凝胶治疗的面部瘢痕。
J Craniofac Surg. 2010 May;21(3):719-23. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d841af.
9
Photographic assessment of postsurgical facial scars epidermally sutured with rapidly absorbable polyglactin 910 or nylon: A randomized clinical trial.应用聚乳酸-910和尼龙皮内缝合修复面部术后瘢痕的随机临床研究
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Nov;83(5):1395-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.016. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
10
Objective and subjective scar aesthetics in minimal access vs conventional access parathyroidectomy and thyroidectomy surgical procedures: a paired cohort study.微创与传统入路甲状旁腺切除术和甲状腺切除术手术中客观与主观瘢痕美学:一项配对队列研究
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jan;134(1):85-93. doi: 10.1001/archotol.134.1.85.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating scar outcomes in pediatric burn patients following skin grafting.评估小儿烧伤患者皮肤移植后的瘢痕结局。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 20;15(1):20205. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06378-y.
2
Fractional CO Laser for Pediatric Hypertrophic Scars: Lessons Learned from a Prematurely Terminated Split-Scar Trial.用于小儿增生性瘢痕的分数二氧化碳激光:从一项提前终止的双盲对照试验中吸取的教训。
Eur Burn J. 2025 Feb 20;6(1):10. doi: 10.3390/ebj6010010.
3
Aesthetic Evaluation of Facial Scars in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Longitudinal Pilot Study and Validation of POSAS 2.0 in the Lithuanian Language.
基底细胞癌手术患者面部瘢痕的美学评估:一项前瞻性纵向试点研究及立陶宛语版POSAS 2.0的验证
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 30;16(11):2091. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112091.
4
Curettage and electrocoagulation versus surgical excision in the treatment of low-risk basal cell carcinoma - Postoperative follow-up and satisfaction at three months: randomized clinical trial.刮除术与电凝术对比手术切除治疗低风险基底细胞癌——术后三个月随访及满意度:随机临床试验
An Bras Dermatol. 2022 May-Jun;97(3):384-386. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2020.12.011. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
5
Mekeres' Psychosocial Internalization Scale: A Scale for the Evaluation of Aesthetic Prejudice in Victims of Accidents and Violence.梅凯雷斯心理社会内化量表:一种用于评估事故和暴力受害者审美偏见的量表。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Oct 26;9(11):1440. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111440.