• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基底细胞癌手术患者面部瘢痕的美学评估:一项前瞻性纵向试点研究及立陶宛语版POSAS 2.0的验证

Aesthetic Evaluation of Facial Scars in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Longitudinal Pilot Study and Validation of POSAS 2.0 in the Lithuanian Language.

作者信息

Kučinskaitė Alvija, Stundys Domantas, Gervickaitė Simona, Tarutytė Gabrielė, Grigaitienė Jūratė, Tutkuvienė Janina, Jančorienė Ligita

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 30;16(11):2091. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112091.

DOI:10.3390/cancers16112091
PMID:38893210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11171257/
Abstract

Facial basal cell carcinoma (BCC) surgery enhances the quality of life (QoL) but leaves patients with inferior QoL, presumably caused by scarring, emphasizing the need to understand post-surgery aesthetic satisfaction. This study aimed to validate the Lithuanian version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) 2.0 and utilise it to identify scar evaluation differences and correlations among POSAS scores and specific aesthetic facial regions, age, gender, surgery types, and short- and long-term QoL. Employing a prospective longitudinal design, 100 patients with facial scars after surgical BCC removal were enrolled. The validation phase confirmed the translated POSAS 2.0 psychometric properties, while the pilot phase used statistical analyses to compare scores among demographic and clinical groups and evaluate correlations between scar assessment and QoL. The findings indicate that the translated Lithuanian version of POSAS 2.0 exhibits good psychometric properties, revealing insights into aesthetic satisfaction with post-surgical facial scars and their impact on QoL. The Lithuanian version of the POSAS 2.0 was established as a valid instrument for measuring post-surgical linear scars. QoL with scar assessment statistically significantly correlates, 6 months after surgery, with worse scores, particularly notable among women, younger patients, and those with tumours in the cheek region.

摘要

面部基底细胞癌(BCC)手术可提高生活质量(QoL),但术后患者的生活质量仍较差,推测这是由瘢痕所致,这凸显了了解术后美学满意度的必要性。本研究旨在验证立陶宛语版的患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)2.0,并利用该量表识别瘢痕评估差异以及POSAS评分与特定面部美学区域、年龄、性别、手术类型和短期及长期生活质量之间的相关性。采用前瞻性纵向设计,招募了100例手术切除面部基底细胞癌后留有瘢痕的患者。验证阶段证实了翻译后的POSAS 2.0的心理测量特性,而试点阶段则使用统计分析比较人口统计学和临床组之间的评分,并评估瘢痕评估与生活质量之间的相关性。研究结果表明,翻译后的立陶宛语版POSAS 2.0具有良好的心理测量特性,揭示了对面部手术瘢痕美学满意度及其对生活质量影响的见解。立陶宛语版的POSAS 2.0被确立为测量术后线性瘢痕的有效工具。术后6个月,瘢痕评估与生活质量在统计学上显著相关,评分较差,在女性、年轻患者以及脸颊区域有肿瘤的患者中尤为明显。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4999/11171257/3603e0c823e2/cancers-16-02091-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4999/11171257/b105bb9464aa/cancers-16-02091-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4999/11171257/3603e0c823e2/cancers-16-02091-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4999/11171257/b105bb9464aa/cancers-16-02091-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4999/11171257/3603e0c823e2/cancers-16-02091-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Aesthetic Evaluation of Facial Scars in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Longitudinal Pilot Study and Validation of POSAS 2.0 in the Lithuanian Language.基底细胞癌手术患者面部瘢痕的美学评估:一项前瞻性纵向试点研究及立陶宛语版POSAS 2.0的验证
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 30;16(11):2091. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112091.
2
Quality of Life in Patients Affected by Facial Basal Cell Carcinoma: Prospective Longitudinal Pilot Study and Validation of Skin Cancer Index in Lithuanian Language.面部基底细胞癌患者的生活质量:前瞻性纵向试点研究及立陶宛语皮肤癌指数的验证
Pragmat Obs Res. 2024 Aug 5;15:103-119. doi: 10.2147/POR.S471307. eCollection 2024.
3
Prospective Evaluation of Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser Treatment of Mature Burn Scars, Post-traumatic Scars, and Post-acne Scars.二氧化碳点阵激光治疗成熟烧伤瘢痕、创伤后瘢痕和痤疮后瘢痕的前瞻性评估
Cureus. 2024 Apr 16;16(4):e58358. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58358. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser treatment of facial scars: Improvement of patients' quality of life, scar quality, and cosmesis.二氧化碳点阵激光治疗面部瘢痕:改善患者生活质量、瘢痕质量和美容效果。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Jul;20(7):2132-2140. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13850. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
5
Gender differences in quality of life and psychological impact of facial burn scars in a tertiary care center.在一家三级护理中心,面部烧伤瘢痕对面部容貌的影响导致的生活质量和心理方面的性别差异。
Burns. 2021 Aug;47(5):1153-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.10.021. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
6
Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and a 4-point scale in evaluating linear facial surgical scars.患者及观察者瘢痕评估量表与4分制量表在评估面部线性手术瘢痕中的可靠性
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Feb;31(2):341-346. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13805. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
7
Surgical Treatment of Facial Basal Cell Carcinoma: Patient-Based Assessment of Clinical Outcome in a Prospective Cohort Study.面部基底细胞癌的外科治疗:一项前瞻性队列研究中基于患者的临床结果评估
Dermatology. 2016;232(5):550-557. doi: 10.1159/000447354. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
The long-term impact of neck scar satisfaction among thyroid surgery patients.甲状腺手术患者颈部瘢痕满意度的长期影响。
Endocr J. 2022 Jul 28;69(7):749-755. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ21-0577. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
9
Evaluation of Quality of Life (BREAST-Q) and Scar Quality (POSAS) after Breast Augmentation.隆胸术后生活质量(BREAST-Q)及瘢痕质量(POSAS)评估
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 May 18;10(5):e4313. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004313. eCollection 2022 May.
10
Post-skin incision scar tissue assessment using patient and observer scar assessment scales: A randomised controlled trial.使用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表进行皮肤切口后瘢痕组织评估:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Nov 1;71:103006. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103006. eCollection 2021 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Term Appearance-Related Outcomes of Facial Reconstruction After Skin Cancer Resection.皮肤癌切除术后面部重建的长期外观相关结果
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2023 Jul-Aug;25(4):344-350. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0170. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
2
Translation and psychometric validation of the Finnish version of the Patient Scar Assessment Scale for use in patients with burn scars.患者烧伤瘢痕评估量表芬兰语版的翻译及心理计量学验证。
Burns. 2023 Aug;49(5):1113-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.08.025. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
Measuring Stakeholder Assessments of Postsurgical Facial Scars: A Retrospective Cohort Inter-rater Analysis of Patients, Physicians, and Medical Student Observers.
测量术后面部疤痕的利益相关者评估:患者、医生和医学生观察者的回顾性队列评估者间分析。
Dermatol Surg. 2022 Apr 1;48(4):418-422. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003405.
4
Author Correction: The incidence and clinical analysis of non‑melanoma skin cancer.作者更正:非黑色素瘤皮肤癌的发病率及临床分析
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 28;11(1):15705. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94435-7.
5
Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Evaluating Linear Scars after Thyroidectomy.患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表在评价甲状腺切除术后线性瘢痕中的可靠性。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021 Jun 1;34(6):1-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000744344.46898.6e.
6
Clinimetric properties of a translated and culturally adapted Norwegian version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale for use in clinical practice and research.经翻译和文化调适后的挪威版患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表在临床实践和研究中的计量特性。
Burns. 2021 Jun;47(4):953-960. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
7
Epidemiology of Skin Cancer: Update 2019.皮肤癌的流行病学:2019 年更新。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1268:123-139. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-46227-7_6.
8
The Natural Evolution of Facial Surgical Scars: A Retrospective Study of Physician-Assessed Scars Using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Over Two Time Points.面部手术瘢痕的自然演变:使用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表在两个时间点评估医师评估的瘢痕的回顾性研究。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021 Sep;23(5):330-338. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0228. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
9
Update in the Management of Basal Cell Carcinoma.基底细胞癌的治疗进展。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2020 Jun 3;100(11):adv00140. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3495.
10
Rasch Analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Linear Scars: Suggestions for a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale v2.1.线性瘢痕患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表的 Rasch 分析:患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表 v2.1 的建议。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Dec;144(6):1073e-1079e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006265.