• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为新冠病毒的患者:政治化科学的破坏性偏见——爆发点、义务与团结的负担

The Patient as COVID: The Destructive Bias of Politicized Science - Flashpoints, Obligations and the Burden of Coming Together.

作者信息

Hoffman Wendell W

机构信息

Sanford Clinic - Infectious Disease, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

出版信息

S D Med. 2020 Aug;73(8):372-374.

PMID:32809297
Abstract

Within an unrelenting COVID-19 pandemic, the burden of helping without harming has grown under the weight of destructive political bias which is harming without helping. This pandemic has created three flashpoints surrounding patient, population and policy. As science is further politicized, the coronafication of medicine is now a subset of the politicization of everything and is challenging these obligations. It is not the presence of personal political bias which degrades science, it is the absence of institutional acknowledgment as conflict of interest. Physicians must interrogate in Socratic fashion, seven deadly sins of destructive bias - character assassination, raw animus, cynical omniscience, historical amnesia, false choice, divisive labelling and selective truthing, which undermine our coming together. At a time when public trust is at risk, we must defend the best interest of the patient against politicized science - for this bias has reached the bedside.

摘要

在持续不断的新冠疫情大流行期间,在有害无益的政治偏见的重压下,做到帮助而不伤害的负担日益加重,这种政治偏见正在造成伤害却毫无帮助。这场大流行在患者、人群和政策方面引发了三个爆发点。随着科学进一步政治化,医学的新冠化如今已成为一切事物政治化的一个子集,并正在挑战这些义务。贬低科学的并非个人政治偏见的存在,而是机构未将其认定为利益冲突。医生必须以苏格拉底式的方式审视破坏偏见的七宗罪——人格诋毁、纯粹敌意、愤世嫉俗的全知、历史健忘、错误选择、分裂性标签和选择性真相陈述,这些破坏了我们团结在一起的努力。在公众信任面临风险之际,我们必须捍卫患者的最大利益,使其免受政治化科学的影响——因为这种偏见已经延伸到了病床边。

相似文献

1
The Patient as COVID: The Destructive Bias of Politicized Science - Flashpoints, Obligations and the Burden of Coming Together.作为新冠病毒的患者:政治化科学的破坏性偏见——爆发点、义务与团结的负担
S D Med. 2020 Aug;73(8):372-374.
2
Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.模型不确定性、政治争议与公众对科学的信任:来自新冠疫情的证据。
Sci Adv. 2020 Oct 21;6(43). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd4563. Print 2020 Oct.
3
The Politicization of COVID-19.新冠病毒政治化
Am J Nurs. 2020 Nov;120(11):19-20. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000721912.74581.d7.
4
The Battle Between Politics and Science Is Costing Us a Timely Victory Over the COVID-19 Pandemic.政治与科学之间的斗争正使我们在战胜新冠疫情方面错失及时取胜的机会。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2020 Nov 1;120(11):806-807. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2020.141.
5
Political casualties of the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情的政治牺牲品。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):755. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30496-5. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
6
Faith, Politics and the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Turkish Response.信仰、政治与新冠疫情:土耳其的应对措施
Med Anthropol. 2020 Jul;39(5):374-375. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2020.1745482. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
7
A US election victory for science and public health.科学与公共卫生在美国大选中获胜。
BMJ. 2020 Nov 10;371:m4325. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4325.
8
Cognitive Bias and Public Health Policy During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的认知偏差与公共卫生政策
JAMA. 2020 Jul 28;324(4):337-338. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11623.
9
Science of consciousness: reflections on the Pandemic by COVID-19.意识科学:关于新冠疫情的思考
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2020 Sep 21;66Suppl 2(Suppl 2):38-40. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.66.S2.38. eCollection 2020.
10
Scientists relieved as Joe Biden wins tight US presidential election.乔·拜登险胜美国总统大选,科学家们松了一口气。
Nature. 2020 Nov;587(7833):183-184. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-03158-8.