Goodwin Marissa J, North Malcolm P, Zald Harold S J, Hurteau Matthew D
Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Mammoth Lakes, CA, USA.
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Nov;26(11):6180-6189. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15318. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
Ongoing climate change will alter the carbon carrying capacity of forests as they adjust to climatic extremes and changing disturbance regimes. In frequent-fire forests, increasing drought frequency and severity are already causing widespread tree mortality events, which can exacerbate the carbon debt that has developed as a result of fire exclusion. Forest management techniques that reduce tree density and surface fuels decrease the risk of high-severity wildfire and may also limit drought-induced mortality by reducing competition. We used a long-term thinning and burning experiment in a mixed-conifer forest to investigate the effects of the 2012-2015 California drought on forest carbon dynamics in each treatment, including the carbon emissions from a second-entry prescribed fire that followed the drought. We assessed differences in carbon stability and tree survival across treatments, expecting that both carbon stability and survival probability would increase with increasing treatment intensity (decreasing basal area). Additionally, we analyzed the effects of drought- mortality on second-entry burn emissions and compared emissions for the first- and second-entry burns. We found a non-linear relationship between treatment intensity and carbon stability, which was in part driven by varying relationships between individual tree growing space and survival across treatments. Drought mortality increased dead tree and surface fuel carbon in all treatments, which contributed to higher second-entry burn emissions for two of the three burn treatments when compared to the first burn. Our findings suggest that restoration treatments will not serve as a panacea for ongoing climate change and that the carbon debt of these forests will become increasingly unstable as the carbon carrying capacity adjusts to severe drought events. Managing the carbon debt with prescribed fire will help reduce the risk of additional mortality from wildfire, but at an increasing carbon cost for forest management.
持续的气候变化将改变森林的碳承载能力,因为森林要适应极端气候和不断变化的干扰模式。在频繁发生火灾的森林中,干旱频率和严重程度的增加已经导致广泛的树木死亡事件,这可能会加剧因排除火灾而产生的碳债务。降低树木密度和地表燃料的森林管理技术可降低高强度野火的风险,还可能通过减少竞争来限制干旱导致的树木死亡。我们在一片针叶混交林中进行了一项长期的间伐和燃烧实验,以研究2012 - 2015年加利福尼亚干旱对各处理方式下森林碳动态的影响,包括干旱后第二次规定火烧的碳排放。我们评估了各处理方式下碳稳定性和树木存活率的差异,预计碳稳定性和存活概率都会随着处理强度的增加(基部面积减少)而提高。此外,我们分析了干旱导致的树木死亡对第二次火烧排放的影响,并比较了第一次和第二次火烧的排放量。我们发现处理强度与碳稳定性之间存在非线性关系,这部分是由各处理方式下树木个体生长空间与存活之间的不同关系驱动的。干旱导致的树木死亡增加了所有处理方式下死树和地表燃料的碳含量,与第一次火烧相比,这导致三种火烧处理方式中的两种在第二次火烧时排放更高。我们的研究结果表明,恢复处理并非应对持续气候变化的万灵药,随着碳承载能力适应严重干旱事件,这些森林的碳债务将变得越来越不稳定。用规定火烧来管理碳债务将有助于降低野火导致额外树木死亡的风险,但森林管理的碳成本会不断增加。