Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charles Nicolle University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Department of Maxillo-Facial and Reconstructive Surgery, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Dec;44(6):2219-2229. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01911-y. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
To achieve adequate nasal proportions, nostril surgery can be a complementary technique useful in facial surgery. To help surgeons with the decision to realize nostril surgery, we conducted a systematic review to summarize reported cases on surgical procedures with a specific interest on indications, surgical procedures and postoperative outcomes. A therapeutic algorithm is also proposed.
We carried out this review in accordance with the PRISMA criteria. Twenty-two eligible studies were identified using Medical databases, including 1599 patients. A qualitative and quantitative analysis was carried out.
Excision techniques were realized on 728 patients (45.5%), followed by cinching sutures on 642 patients (40%) and combined techniques: excision techniques with flap advancement techniques in 189 cases (12%), excision techniques with flap advancement techniques and cinching suture in 40 patients (2.5%). When excessive alar flaring was present, alar wedge resection was preferred in the 92% of followed by alar and sill resection. Cinching sutures were realized when excessive alar flaring was associated with a vertical alar axis, in cases of wide alar base, of associated orthognathic surgery. When excessive alar flaring was associated with wide alar bases, indications changed basing on the associated deformities. In 795 patients, nostril surgery was conducted simultaneously with rhinoplasty.
Nostril surgery through excision techniques, cinching sutures or flaps advancement techniques, reveals good outcomes and can be complementary to rhinoplasty or orthognathic surgery. Through this systematic review, we tried to orient surgeons to find the best treatment for nostril base surgery.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
为了达到理想的鼻部比例,鼻翼手术可以作为面部整形手术的一种补充技术。为了帮助外科医生做出鼻翼手术的决策,我们进行了系统评价,以总结报告中关于手术程序的病例,重点关注适应证、手术程序和术后结果。我们还提出了一种治疗算法。
我们按照 PRISMA 标准进行了这项综述。使用医学数据库共确定了 22 项符合条件的研究,其中包括 1599 名患者。我们对这些研究进行了定性和定量分析。
728 例患者(45.5%)采用切除术,642 例患者(40%)采用缩紧缝线,189 例患者(12%)采用联合技术:切除联合皮瓣推进技术,40 例患者(2.5%)采用切除联合皮瓣推进技术和缩紧缝线。当鼻翼过度外展时,92%的患者首选鼻翼楔形切除术,其次是鼻翼和牙槽突切除术。当鼻翼过度外展伴有垂直鼻翼轴时,或鼻翼基底过宽,或需要同期正颌手术时,采用缩紧缝线。当鼻翼过度外展伴鼻翼基底过宽时,应根据相关畸形来确定适应证。795 例患者同期行鼻翼整形术。
通过切除、缩紧缝线或皮瓣推进技术进行鼻翼整形术,可获得良好的效果,可作为鼻整形术或正颌手术的补充。通过这项系统评价,我们试图为外科医生提供指导,找到治疗鼻翼基底手术的最佳方法。
证据等级 III:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定一个证据等级。如需详细了解这些循证医学分级,请参考目录或在线投稿须知(www.springer.com/00266)。