Psychology, Department of Health and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
School of Social Sciences, London Metropolitan University, London, UK.
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Jul;29(4):1061-1071. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13140. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
Despite the increasing policy focus on integrated dementia care in the UK, little is known about the opportunities and challenges encountered by practitioners charged with implementing these policies on the ground. We undertook an extensive, mixed-methods analysis of how a contemporary multidisciplinary dementia pathway in the UK was experienced and negotiated by service providers. Our pragmatic mixed methods design incorporated three types of research interaction with practitioners: (a) Semi-structured interviews (n = 31) and focus group discussions (n = 4), (b) Practitioner 'shadowing' observations (n = 19), and (c) Service attendance and performance metrics reviews (n = 8). Through an abductive analysis of practitioner narratives and practice observations, we evidenced how inter-practitioner prejudices, restrictive and competitive commissioning frameworks, barriers to effective data sharing and other resource constraints, all challenged integrative dementia care and led to unintended consequences such as practice overlap and failure to identify and respond to people's needs. In order to more successfully realise integrated dementia pathways, we propose innovative commissioning frameworks which purposefully seek to diffuse power imbalances, encourage inter-provider respect and understanding, and determine clear lines of responsibility.
尽管英国越来越重视痴呆症的综合护理政策,但对于负责在实地实施这些政策的从业者所面临的机遇和挑战却知之甚少。我们对英国当代多学科痴呆症途径的实施情况进行了广泛的、混合方法的分析,并对服务提供者进行了协商。我们的实用混合方法设计包括与从业者进行三种类型的研究互动:(a)半结构化访谈(n=31)和焦点小组讨论(n=4),(b)从业者“跟踪”观察(n=19),和(c)服务出席和绩效指标审查(n=8)。通过对从业者叙述和实践观察的归纳分析,我们证明了从业者之间的偏见、限制和竞争的委托框架、有效数据共享的障碍以及其他资源限制如何挑战综合痴呆症护理,并导致意想不到的后果,如实践重叠和未能确定和满足人们的需求。为了更成功地实现综合痴呆症途径,我们提出了创新的委托框架,旨在有意地消除权力失衡,鼓励提供者之间的尊重和理解,并确定明确的责任线。