• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善儿科预先护理计划:学习需求分析和基于模拟的教育项目的结果

Improving paediatric advance care planning: Results of a learning needs analysis and simulation-based education programme.

作者信息

Katz Naomi T, Sacks Bronwyn H, Hynson Jenny L, Heywood Melissa, Williams Molly, Sokol Jenni

机构信息

Victorian Paediatric Palliative Care Program, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Simulation Program, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Dec;56(12):1898-1905. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15074. Epub 2020 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1111/jpc.15074
PMID:32812306
Abstract

AIM

To assess clinicians' experience, attitudes and confidence with advance care planning (ACP) at a quaternary paediatric referral centre using a learning-needs survey, and then apply this information to develop and examine the feasibility of simulation-based education for this topic.

METHODS

An electronic learning-needs survey was distributed to medical, nursing and allied health clinicians from departments who provide primary care for children with life-limiting conditions. Results were incorporated into the design of a simulation-based education session which was piloted with the Royal Children's Hospital Oncology Department.

RESULTS

A total of 157 learning-needs surveys were included in analysis, and included quantitative and qualitative responses from nursing, allied health, senior and junior medical staff from intensive care, general and subspecialty medical teams. Most (75.0%) participants had participated in ACP discussions previously. Only 40.1% of participants felt confident to assess appropriate timing of, and 45.2% felt adequately prepared to participate in ACP discussions. Barriers identified were both clinician and patient/parent related, including clinicians not knowing when to address issues (43.9%) or what to say (21.0%). Participants indicated that ACP discussions are most frequently initiated when death is clearly imminent. Following a pilot of simulation-based education with the oncology department, 90% of participants expressed confidence to participate in ACP discussions.

CONCLUSIONS

Barriers to paediatric ACP, including lack of clinician training, continue to contribute to delayed conversations. Simulation-based education is a valuable and feasible educational tool that can increase clinicians' understanding and confidence in this area.

摘要

目的

通过一项学习需求调查,评估一家四级儿科转诊中心的临床医生在预立医疗计划(ACP)方面的经验、态度和信心,然后运用这些信息来开发并检验针对该主题的基于模拟的教育的可行性。

方法

向为患有危及生命疾病的儿童提供初级护理的各科室的医学、护理和专职医疗临床医生发放了一份电子学习需求调查问卷。结果被纳入到一个基于模拟的教育课程的设计中,该课程在皇家儿童医院肿瘤科进行了试点。

结果

共有157份学习需求调查问卷纳入分析,包括来自重症监护、普通和专科医疗团队的护理、专职医疗、高级和初级医务人员的定量和定性回复。大多数(75.0%)参与者此前曾参与过ACP讨论。只有40.1%的参与者认为有信心评估适当的时机,45.2%的参与者认为有充分准备参与ACP讨论。所确定的障碍既有与临床医生相关的,也有与患者/家长相关的,包括临床医生不知道何时讨论问题(43.9%)或不知道说什么(21.0%)。参与者表示,当死亡明显临近时,ACP讨论最常开始。在肿瘤科进行基于模拟的教育试点后,90%的参与者表示有信心参与ACP讨论。

结论

儿科ACP的障碍,包括临床医生缺乏培训,继续导致讨论延迟。基于模拟的教育是一种有价值且可行的教育工具,可以增强临床医生在这方面的理解和信心。

相似文献

1
Improving paediatric advance care planning: Results of a learning needs analysis and simulation-based education programme.改善儿科预先护理计划:学习需求分析和基于模拟的教育项目的结果
J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Dec;56(12):1898-1905. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15074. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
2
Paediatric advance care planning: Physician experience and education in initiating difficult discussions.儿科预先护理计划:医生在发起艰难讨论方面的经验与教育
J Paediatr Child Health. 2018 May;54(5):510-514. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13818. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
3
Advance Care Planning in palliative care: a qualitative investigation into the perspective of Paediatric Intensive Care Unit staff.姑息治疗中的预先护理计划:对儿科重症监护病房工作人员观点的定性调查。
Palliat Med. 2015 Apr;29(4):371-9. doi: 10.1177/0269216315573000. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
4
Normalising advance care planning in a general medicine service of a tertiary hospital: an exploratory study.在一家三级医院的普通内科服务中规范预先护理计划:一项探索性研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2016 Sep;40(4):391-398. doi: 10.1071/AH15068.
5
Experiences with a national team-based learning program for advance care planning in pediatric palliative care.国家团队为儿科临终关怀的预先医疗指示计划所进行的学习经验。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Aug 3;23(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01515-2.
6
Teaching general practitioners and doctors-in-training to discuss advance care planning: evaluation of a brief multimodality education programme.培训全科医生和实习医生进行预先医疗照护计划讨论:一个简短的多模式教育方案的评估。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2014 Sep;4(3):313-21. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000450. Epub 2014 May 20.
7
Clinicians' practices and attitudes regarding advance care planning in mainland China: A multicenter cross-sectional survey.中国大陆临床医生在预先医疗照护计划方面的实践和态度:一项多中心横断面调查。
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Jun;21(3):477-482. doi: 10.1017/S1478951522000177.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Proactive advance care planning conversations in general practice: a quality improvement project.在全科医疗中进行积极的预先护理计划对话:一项质量改进项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jul 8;13(3):e002679. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002679.
10
A systematic review of the effects of advance care planning facilitators training programs.对预先护理计划促进者培训项目效果的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 7;19(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4192-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric Advance Care Planning: A Scoping Review.儿科预先护理计划:一项范围综述
Children (Basel). 2023 Jul 7;10(7):1179. doi: 10.3390/children10071179.
2
Effect of the Family-Centered Advance Care Planning for Teens with Cancer Intervention on Sustainability of Congruence About End-of-Life Treatment Preferences: A Randomized Clinical Trial.以家庭为中心的青少年癌症预先照护计划对维持末期治疗意愿共识的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2220696. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20696.