Sapudom Jiranuwat, Alatoom Aseel, Mohamed Walaa K E, Garcia-Sabaté Anna, McBain Ian, Nasser Rasha A, Teo Jeremy C M
Laboratory for Immuno Bioengineering Research and Applications, Division of Engineering, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Department of Microbiology Immunology, College of Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates.
Biomater Sci. 2020 Sep 15;8(18):5106-5120. doi: 10.1039/d0bm01141j.
Dendritic cells (DCs) are antigen-presenting cells capable of either activating the immune response or inducing and maintaining immune tolerance. Understanding how biophysical properties affect DC behaviors will provide insight into the biology of a DC and its applications. In this work, we studied how cell culture dimensionality (two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D)), and matrix density of 3D collagen matrices modulate differentiation and functions of DCs. Besides, we aimed to point out the different conceptual perspectives in modern immunological research, namely tissue-centric and cell-centric perspectives. The tissue-centric perspective intends to reveal how specific microenvironments dictate DC differentiation and in turn modulate DC functionalities, while the cell-centric perspective aims to demonstrate how pre-differentiated DCs behave in specific microenvironments. DC plasticity was characterized in terms of cell surface markers and cytokine secretion profiles. Subsequently, antigen internalization and T cell activation were quantified to demonstrate the cellular functions of immature DCs (iDCs) and mature DCs (mDCs), respectively. In the tissue-centric perspective, we found that expressed surface markers and secreted cytokines of both iDCs and mDCs are generally higher in 2D culture, while they are regulated by matrix density in 3D culture. In contrast, in the cell-centric perspective, we found enhanced expression of cell surface markers as well as distinct cytokine secretion profiles in both iDCs and mDCs. By analyzing cellular functions of cells in the tissue-centric perspective, we found matrix density dependence in antigen uptake by iDCs, as well as on mDC-mediated T cell proliferation in 3D cell culture. On the other hand, in the cell-centric perspective, both iDCs and mDCs appeared to lose their functional potentials to internalization antigen and T cell stimulation. Additionally, mDCs from tissue- and cell-centric perspectives modulated T cell differentiation by their distinct cytokine secretion profiles towards Th1 and Th17, respectively. In sum, our work emphasizes the importance of dimensionality, as well as collagen fibrillar density in the regulation of the immune response of DCs. Besides this, we demonstrated that the conceptual perspective of the experimental design could be an essential key point in research in immune cell-material interactions and biomaterial-based disease models of immunity.
树突状细胞(DCs)是能够激活免疫反应或诱导并维持免疫耐受的抗原呈递细胞。了解生物物理特性如何影响DC行为将有助于深入了解DC的生物学特性及其应用。在这项工作中,我们研究了细胞培养维度(二维(2D)和三维(3D))以及3D胶原基质的基质密度如何调节DC的分化和功能。此外,我们旨在指出现代免疫学研究中不同的概念视角,即组织中心视角和细胞中心视角。组织中心视角旨在揭示特定微环境如何决定DC分化,进而调节DC功能,而细胞中心视角旨在证明预分化的DC在特定微环境中的行为。通过细胞表面标志物和细胞因子分泌谱对DC可塑性进行了表征。随后,分别对未成熟DC(iDCs)和成熟DC(mDCs)的抗原内化和T细胞活化进行了定量,以证明其细胞功能。在组织中心视角中,我们发现iDCs和mDCs的表达表面标志物和分泌细胞因子在2D培养中通常更高,而在3D培养中它们受基质密度调节。相比之下,在细胞中心视角中,我们发现iDCs和mDCs中细胞表面标志物的表达增强以及细胞因子分泌谱不同。通过从组织中心视角分析细胞的细胞功能,我们发现在3D细胞培养中iDCs摄取抗原以及mDC介导的T细胞增殖存在基质密度依赖性。另一方面,在细胞中心视角中,iDCs和mDCs似乎都失去了内化抗原和刺激T细胞的功能潜力。此外,从组织中心和细胞中心视角获得的mDCs通过其分别向Th1和Th17的不同细胞因子分泌谱调节T细胞分化。总之,我们的工作强调了维度以及胶原纤维密度在调节DC免疫反应中的重要性。除此之外,我们证明了实验设计的概念视角可能是免疫细胞 - 材料相互作用和基于生物材料的免疫疾病模型研究中的一个关键要点。