• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

户外自然为基础的康复治疗方案对精神疾病患者的影响:一项定性的系统性回顾。

Experiences of outdoor nature-based therapeutic recreation programs for persons with a mental illness: a qualitative systematic review.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

Centre for Evidence Based Initiatives in Health Care: A JBI Centre of Excellence.

出版信息

JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Sep;18(9):1820-1869. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00263.

DOI:10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00263
PMID:32813402
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to identify, appraise, and synthesize the best available evidence related to participation in outdoor nature-based therapeutic recreation programs for adults with a mental illness living in the community.

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic recreation is posited to be beneficial for persons living with a mental illness. Research evidence indicates that therapeutic recreation programs can foster mental health recovery. It is important to understand the effectiveness of this from the perspective of persons living with mental illness how outdoor nature-based therapeutic recreation programs are meaningful and helpful for recovery.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review considered studies that collected qualitative data on the experiences and perspectives of adults with a mental illness regarding their participation in outdoor nature-based therapeutic recreation programs.

METHODS

The databases PsycINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Informit, as well as unpublished sources in gray literature (Google Scholar, OpenGrey), were searched and reference lists were checked to locate any additional studies. Studies published in English were considered, with a date range from inception to 2019. Three reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the studies that met the inclusion criteria using the JBI critical appraisal approach for qualitative research. Data were extracted by one reviewer using the standardized qualitative extraction tool and checked for accuracy by three other reviewers. The qualitative research findings were pooled using JBI methodology. The JBI process of meta-aggregation was used to identify categories and synthesized findings, and a level of confidence was assigned to both synthesized findings.

RESULTS

Eighteen papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the data extraction phase. A total of 84 findings were extracted and aggregated into six categories based on similarity of meaning and two synthesized findings. The methodological quality of the studies varied, and the overall level of confidence of the synthesized findings was determined to be moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

This review identified that persons living with mental illness perceive outdoor nature-based therapeutic recreation as enjoyable and that therapeutic recreation makes a positive contribution to mental health. Congruent with the literature, therapeutic recreation offers a socially inclusive and psychologically safe environment. The intentionally structured social milieu enhances the formation of social relationships and meaningful connections for persons with mental illness. Elements linked with psychological well-being, such as intrinsic motivation, overcoming perceived challenges, and finding purpose and meaning, are enhanced through participation in therapeutic recreation in outdoor nature-based settings. Increased levels of physical activity, greater self-esteem, and enhanced sense of identity were some of the perceived positive changes. This review provides important insights into the subjective needs of persons with mental illness who undertake therapeutic recreation in outdoor nature-based settings. The qualitative findings can inform health care providers, or those interested in therapeutic recreation programming, to use alongside quantitative evidence of effectiveness to design nature-based therapeutic recreation activities that are meaningful for persons with mental illness. Limitations of the research were that papers published in languages other than English were not searched, and papers not located may have influenced the findings of this review.

摘要

目的

本综述旨在确定、评价和综合与社区中患有精神疾病的成年人参与户外自然为基础的治疗性娱乐项目相关的最佳现有证据。

介绍

治疗性娱乐被认为对患有精神疾病的人有益。研究证据表明,治疗性娱乐项目可以促进心理健康康复。了解这一点很重要,从患有精神疾病的人的角度来看,户外自然为基础的治疗性娱乐项目对康复意味着什么,有什么帮助。

纳入标准

本综述考虑了收集有关成年人参与户外自然为基础的治疗性娱乐项目的经验和观点的定性数据的研究。

方法

使用 PsycINFO、CINAHL、MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Informit 数据库,以及 Google Scholar、OpenGrey 等未发表的灰色文献来源进行搜索,并查阅参考文献以查找任何其他研究。考虑了发表在英语中的研究,时间范围从开始到 2019 年。三位评审员使用 JBI 定性研究评估方法独立评估符合纳入标准的研究的方法学质量。一位评审员使用标准化定性提取工具提取数据,并由另外三位评审员检查准确性。使用 JBI 方法对定性研究结果进行汇总。使用 JBI 元聚合过程确定类别并综合研究结果,并为综合研究结果分配置信度级别。

结果

18 篇论文符合纳入标准并进入数据提取阶段。共提取了 84 个发现,并根据相似的含义将其分为六个类别,同时形成了两个综合发现。研究的方法学质量各不相同,综合研究结果的整体置信度水平被确定为中等。

结论

本综述发现,患有精神疾病的人认为户外自然为基础的治疗性娱乐活动令人愉快,并且治疗性娱乐活动对心理健康有积极的贡献。与文献一致,治疗性娱乐活动提供了一个社会包容和心理安全的环境。有意设计的社交环境增强了精神病患者之间社会关系和有意义联系的形成。与心理幸福感相关的元素,如内在动机、克服感知到的挑战以及寻找目标和意义,通过在户外自然环境中进行治疗性娱乐活动得到了增强。一些感知到的积极变化包括更高水平的身体活动、更高的自尊心和增强的身份认同感。本综述为在户外自然环境中进行治疗性娱乐活动的精神病患者的主观需求提供了重要见解。定性研究结果可以为卫生保健提供者或对治疗性娱乐项目感兴趣的人员提供信息,以便与治疗性娱乐活动的有效性的定量证据一起使用,为精神病患者设计有意义的自然为基础的治疗性娱乐活动。研究的局限性在于,没有搜索以英语以外的语言发表的论文,并且未找到的论文可能会影响本综述的结果。

相似文献

1
Experiences of outdoor nature-based therapeutic recreation programs for persons with a mental illness: a qualitative systematic review.户外自然为基础的康复治疗方案对精神疾病患者的影响:一项定性的系统性回顾。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Sep;18(9):1820-1869. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00263.
2
Experiences of outdoor nature-based therapeutic recreation programs for persons with a mental illness: a qualitative systematic review protocol.针对患有精神疾病者的户外自然疗法休闲项目体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Dec;17(12):2517-2524. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00046.
3
Experiences of people with Parkinson's disease and their views on physical activity interventions: a qualitative systematic review.帕金森病患者的经历及其对体育活动干预的看法:一项定性系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Apr;17(4):548-613. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003901.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
The experiences of midwives and nurses collaborating to provide birthing care: a systematic review.助产士与护士合作提供分娩护理的经验:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):74-127. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2444.
8
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
9
Experiences of mental health professionals and patients in the use of pro re nata medication in acute adult mental healthcare settings: a systematic review.心理健康专业人员和患者在急性成人精神卫生保健环境中按需用药的经验:一项系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Oct;14(10):209-250. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003167.
10
Young women's experiences of psychotic illness: a systematic review of qualitative research.年轻女性的精神病经历:定性研究的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Mar;15(3):694-737. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-002942.

引用本文的文献

1
Nature-based interventions: a systematic review of reviews.基于自然的干预措施:综述的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 8;16:1625294. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1625294. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of nature-based health interventions for individuals diagnosed with anxiety, depression and/or experiencing stress-a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于自然的健康干预对被诊断患有焦虑症、抑郁症和/或经历压力的个体的影响——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 24;15(7):e098598. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098598.
3
Contributing to 'a sense of purpose' - Evaluating consumer recovery progress after attending a therapeutic-recreation intervention programme: A quantitative analysis.
有助于“找到目标感”——评估参加治疗性娱乐干预计划后的消费者康复进展:一项定量分析。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;70(5):926-932. doi: 10.1177/00207640241242024. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
4
Bibliometric Analysis of Nature-Based Therapy Research.基于自然疗法研究的文献计量分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 27;11(9):1249. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091249.
5
Effects of virtual reality natural experiences on factory workers' psychological and physiological stress.虚拟现实自然体验对工厂工人心理和生理压力的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 6;14:993143. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.993143. eCollection 2023.
6
How to Best Develop and Deliver Generic Long-Term Condition Rehabilitation Programmes in Rural Settings: An Integrative Review.如何在农村地区最佳地制定和实施通用的长期疾病康复计划:一项综合综述。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Jun 21;3:904007. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.904007. eCollection 2022.
7
Context, classification and study methodologies in research into nature-based therapies: protocol for a scoping review.基于自然的疗法研究中的背景、分类和研究方法:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 7;12(4):e060734. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060734.
8
Nature-Based Rehabilitation for Patients with Long-Standing Stress-Related Mental Disorders: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis of Patients' Experiences.基于自然的康复疗法对长期应激相关精神障碍患者的作用:基于患者体验的定性证据综合
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 27;18(13):6897. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136897.
9
Nature's Role in Outdoor Therapies: An Umbrella Review.自然在户外疗法中的作用:一项综合综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 12;18(10):5117. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105117.