• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

姑息治疗中的宽恕促进:一项范围综述

Forgiveness facilitation in palliative care: a scoping review.

作者信息

Silva Rita Santos, Caldeira Sílvia, Coelho Adriana Neves, Apóstolo João Luís Alves

机构信息

Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal.

Portugal Centre for Evidence Based Practice: A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Nov;18(11):2196-2230. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00286.

DOI:10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00286
PMID:32813428
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to map the nature and extent of forgiveness facilitation intervention implemented and evaluated in palliative care contexts.

INTRODUCTION

Spiritual beliefs often include reconciliation and forgiveness, which are critical to patients and families in palliative care. Forgiveness facilitation can represent a valuable response as a multidisciplinary and non-pharmacological intervention to reduce suffering.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Studies including palliative care patients aged 18 years or over and assisted by palliative care teams, including all healthcare professionals, chaplains, and volunteers, were included in this review.

METHODS

This scoping review is based on JBI methodology. The search was conducted in June 2017 and updated in December 2018 using international databases and gray literature in English, Spanish, German, Italian, and Portuguese.

RESULTS

A total of 23 articles were included in this review. The results suggest a growing interest in forgiveness facilitation in palliative care in different spiritual and religious traditions. Most studies are based on a psychological perspective. Several activities related to the intervention have been identified, but few details or characteristics are described. Social workers, nurses, doctors, and psychologists were most identified as healthcare staff involved in forgiveness facilitation. The outcomes related to the intervention are mental, physical, and relational well-being; quality of life, decision-making and communication; self-esteem and hope; depression, anger, and anxiety; and inner peace.

CONCLUSIONS

Forgiveness facilitation is critical in palliative care and is grounded in a multidisciplinary approach, but further evidence is needed to inform clinical implementation. These results open new perspectives for research and training on palliative healthcare staff.

摘要

目的

本综述的目的是梳理在姑息治疗背景下实施和评估的宽恕促进干预措施的性质和范围。

引言

精神信仰通常包含和解与宽恕,这对姑息治疗中的患者及其家人至关重要。宽恕促进作为一种多学科且非药物的干预措施,对于减轻痛苦而言可能是一种有价值的应对方式。

纳入标准

本综述纳入了包括18岁及以上姑息治疗患者且由姑息治疗团队提供协助的研究,姑息治疗团队包括所有医疗保健专业人员、牧师和志愿者。

方法

本范围综述基于循证卫生保健国际协作网(JBI)方法。检索于2017年6月进行,并于2018年12月更新,使用了英文、西班牙文、德文、意大利文和葡萄牙文的国际数据库及灰色文献。

结果

本综述共纳入23篇文章。结果表明,在不同的精神和宗教传统中,姑息治疗领域对宽恕促进的兴趣日益浓厚。大多数研究基于心理学视角。已确定了一些与该干预相关的活动,但对其细节或特征描述甚少。社会工作者、护士、医生和心理学家被确定为参与宽恕促进的主要医护人员。与该干预相关的结果包括心理、身体和人际关系的幸福感;生活质量、决策和沟通;自尊和希望;抑郁、愤怒和焦虑;以及内心平静。

结论

宽恕促进在姑息治疗中至关重要,且基于多学科方法,但需要更多证据为临床实施提供参考。这些结果为姑息治疗医护人员的研究和培训开辟了新的视角。

相似文献

1
Forgiveness facilitation in palliative care: a scoping review.姑息治疗中的宽恕促进:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Nov;18(11):2196-2230. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00286.
2
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
3
Forgiveness facilitation in palliative care: a scoping review protocol.姑息治疗中的宽恕促进:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Oct;15(10):2469-2479. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003337.
4
Use of non-pharmacological interventions for comforting patients in palliative care: a scoping review.姑息治疗中使用非药物干预措施安慰患者:一项范围综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Jul;15(7):1867-1904. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003204.
5
A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of the Evidence Underpinning Theoretical Perspectives and Cultural Influences on Forgiveness in Palliative Care.系统综述与叙事综合:理论视角与文化对姑息治疗中宽恕影响的证据。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Aug;25(8):1282-1308. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0657. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
Provider Difficulties With Spiritual and Forgiveness Communication at the End of Life.临终时医护人员在精神与宽恕沟通方面面临的困难。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016 Nov;33(9):843-848. doi: 10.1177/1049909115591811. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Palliative rehabilitation interventions in palliative care: a scoping review protocol.姑息治疗中的姑息康复干预措施:一项范围综述方案
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Nov;18(11):2349-2356. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00024.
10
Healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医疗保健使用者就患有危及生命疾病的儿童与医疗保健专业人员沟通的经历:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):33-42. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2413.

引用本文的文献

1
Physiotherapy Intervention for Promoting Comfort in Palliative Care Patients: A Focus Group Study.物理治疗干预促进姑息治疗患者舒适度:一项焦点小组研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 27;17(13):2167. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132167.
2
Flourishing at the end of life.生命末期的蓬勃发展。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2024 Oct;45(5):401-425. doi: 10.1007/s11017-024-09679-x. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
3
Spiritual Distress, Hopelessness, and Depression in Palliative Care: Simultaneous Concept Analysis.姑息治疗中的精神困扰、绝望与抑郁:同步概念分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 7;12(10):960. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12100960.
4
Nursing students' perceptions of spiritual needs at the end of life. A qualitative study.护生对临终患者精神需求的认知:一项质性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 14;14:1132581. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1132581. eCollection 2023.