Professor Emeritus, Departments of Family Medicine and Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact and the Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON.
PhD Candidate, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Healthc Policy. 2020 Aug;16(1):43-57. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2020.26291.
In the fall of 2014, Health Quality Ontario released A Primary Care Performance Measurement Framework for Ontario. Recognizing the large number of recommended measures and the limited availability of data related to those measures, the Steering Committee for the Primary Care Performance Measurement (PCPM) initiative established a prioritization process to select two subsets of high-value performance measures - one at the system level and one at the practice level. This article describes the prioritization process and its results and outlines the initiatives that have been undertaken to date to implement the PCPM framework and to advance primary care performance measurement and reporting in Ontario. Establishing a framework for primary care measurement and prioritizing system- and practice-level measures are essential steps toward system improvement. Our experience suggests that the process of implementing a performance measurement system is inevitably non-linear and incremental.
2014 年秋,安大略省卫生质量组织发布了《安大略省初级保健绩效衡量框架》。鉴于建议的衡量指标数量众多,以及与这些指标相关的数据有限,初级保健绩效衡量(PCPM)计划指导委员会制定了一个优先级排序过程,以选择两个高价值绩效衡量指标子集 - 一个在系统层面,一个在实践层面。本文描述了优先级排序过程及其结果,并概述了迄今为止为实施 PCPM 框架以及推进安大略省初级保健绩效衡量和报告而采取的举措。建立初级保健衡量框架和优先考虑系统和实践层面的措施是实现系统改进的必要步骤。我们的经验表明,实施绩效衡量系统的过程不可避免地是非线性和渐进的。