Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Injury. 2020 Nov;51(11):2546-2552. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.07.063. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
Patients on prehospital anticoagulation with warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent a vulnerable subset of the trauma population. While protocolized warfarin reversal is widely available and easily implemented, prehospital anticoagulation with DOAC is cost prohibitive with only a few reversal options. This study aims to compare hospital outcomes of non-head injured trauma patients taking pre-injury DOAC versus warfarin.
A retrospective cohort study at a level 1 trauma center was performed. All adult trauma patients with pre-injury anticoagulation admitted between January 2015 and December 2018, were stratified into DOAC-using and warfarin-using groups. Patients were excluded if they had traumatic brain injury (TBI). Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed. Outcomes measures included in-hospital mortality, blood transfusion requirements, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS and discharge disposition.
374 non-TBI trauma patients on anticoagulation were identified, of which 134 were on DOACs and 240 on warfarin. Patients on DOACs had a higher ISS (9 [IQR, 9-10] vs. 9 [IQR, 5-9]; p<0.001), and lower admission INR values (1.2 [IQR, 1.1-1.3] vs 2.4 [IQR, 1.8-2.7]; p<0.001) than warfarin users. Use of reversal agents was higher in warfarin users (p<0.001). Relative to warfarin, DOAC users did not differ significantly with respect to hospital mortality (OR 0.47, 95% CI [0.13-1.73]). Multivariable analysis (not possible for mortality) did not show significant difference for RBC transfusion requirements (OR 0.92 [0.51-1.67]), ICU LOS (OR 1.08 [0.53-2.19]), hospital LOS (OR 1.10 [0.70-1.74]) or discharge disposition (OR 0.56 [0.29-1.11]) between the groups.
Despite lower reversal rates and higher ISS, non-TBI trauma patients with pre-injury DOAC use had similar outcomes as patients on pre-injury warfarin. There may be equipoise to have larger, prospective studies evaluating the comparative safety of DOACs and warfarin in the population prone to low energy fall type injuries.
服用华法林或直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的患者在创伤人群中属于脆弱亚群。虽然广泛提供并易于实施华法林逆转方案,但 DOAC 的院前抗凝治疗费用过高,仅有少数逆转选择。本研究旨在比较服用术前 DOAC 与华法林的非颅脑损伤创伤患者的住院结局。
在一家一级创伤中心进行回顾性队列研究。所有 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间因术前抗凝治疗而入院的成年创伤患者均分为 DOAC 组和华法林组。如果患者有颅脑损伤(TBI)则被排除在外。进行单变量和多变量分析。纳入的结局指标包括院内死亡率、输血需求、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(LOS)、医院住院时间(LOS)和出院去向。
确定了 374 名非 TBI 创伤患者服用抗凝药物,其中 134 名患者服用 DOAC,240 名患者服用华法林。DOAC 组患者的 ISS 更高(9 [IQR,9-10] vs. 9 [IQR,5-9];p<0.001),入院 INR 值更低(1.2 [IQR,1.1-1.3] vs. 2.4 [IQR,1.8-2.7];p<0.001),而华法林组患者使用逆转剂的比例更高(p<0.001)。与华法林相比,DOAC 组患者在院内死亡率方面无显著差异(OR 0.47,95%CI [0.13-1.73])。多变量分析(死亡率除外)显示,红细胞输注需求(OR 0.92 [0.51-1.67])、ICU LOS(OR 1.08 [0.53-2.19])、医院 LOS(OR 1.10 [0.70-1.74])或出院去向(OR 0.56 [0.29-1.11])之间无显著差异。
尽管 DOAC 组的逆转率较低,ISS 较高,但术前使用 DOAC 的非颅脑损伤创伤患者的结局与术前使用华法林的患者相似。对于容易发生低能量跌倒类型损伤的人群,可能需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来评估 DOAC 和华法林的相对安全性。