Suppr超能文献

比较非颅脑损伤创伤患者使用华法林或直接口服抗凝剂治疗的结局。

Comparison of outcomes in non-head injured trauma patients using pre-injury warfarin or direct oral anticoagulant therapy.

机构信息

Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Injury. 2020 Nov;51(11):2546-2552. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.07.063. Epub 2020 Aug 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients on prehospital anticoagulation with warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent a vulnerable subset of the trauma population. While protocolized warfarin reversal is widely available and easily implemented, prehospital anticoagulation with DOAC is cost prohibitive with only a few reversal options. This study aims to compare hospital outcomes of non-head injured trauma patients taking pre-injury DOAC versus warfarin.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study at a level 1 trauma center was performed. All adult trauma patients with pre-injury anticoagulation admitted between January 2015 and December 2018, were stratified into DOAC-using and warfarin-using groups. Patients were excluded if they had traumatic brain injury (TBI). Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed. Outcomes measures included in-hospital mortality, blood transfusion requirements, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS and discharge disposition.

RESULTS

374 non-TBI trauma patients on anticoagulation were identified, of which 134 were on DOACs and 240 on warfarin. Patients on DOACs had a higher ISS (9 [IQR, 9-10] vs. 9 [IQR, 5-9]; p<0.001), and lower admission INR values (1.2 [IQR, 1.1-1.3] vs 2.4 [IQR, 1.8-2.7]; p<0.001) than warfarin users. Use of reversal agents was higher in warfarin users (p<0.001). Relative to warfarin, DOAC users did not differ significantly with respect to hospital mortality (OR 0.47, 95% CI [0.13-1.73]). Multivariable analysis (not possible for mortality) did not show significant difference for RBC transfusion requirements (OR 0.92 [0.51-1.67]), ICU LOS (OR 1.08 [0.53-2.19]), hospital LOS (OR 1.10 [0.70-1.74]) or discharge disposition (OR 0.56 [0.29-1.11]) between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite lower reversal rates and higher ISS, non-TBI trauma patients with pre-injury DOAC use had similar outcomes as patients on pre-injury warfarin. There may be equipoise to have larger, prospective studies evaluating the comparative safety of DOACs and warfarin in the population prone to low energy fall type injuries.

摘要

背景

服用华法林或直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的患者在创伤人群中属于脆弱亚群。虽然广泛提供并易于实施华法林逆转方案,但 DOAC 的院前抗凝治疗费用过高,仅有少数逆转选择。本研究旨在比较服用术前 DOAC 与华法林的非颅脑损伤创伤患者的住院结局。

方法

在一家一级创伤中心进行回顾性队列研究。所有 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间因术前抗凝治疗而入院的成年创伤患者均分为 DOAC 组和华法林组。如果患者有颅脑损伤(TBI)则被排除在外。进行单变量和多变量分析。纳入的结局指标包括院内死亡率、输血需求、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(LOS)、医院住院时间(LOS)和出院去向。

结果

确定了 374 名非 TBI 创伤患者服用抗凝药物,其中 134 名患者服用 DOAC,240 名患者服用华法林。DOAC 组患者的 ISS 更高(9 [IQR,9-10] vs. 9 [IQR,5-9];p<0.001),入院 INR 值更低(1.2 [IQR,1.1-1.3] vs. 2.4 [IQR,1.8-2.7];p<0.001),而华法林组患者使用逆转剂的比例更高(p<0.001)。与华法林相比,DOAC 组患者在院内死亡率方面无显著差异(OR 0.47,95%CI [0.13-1.73])。多变量分析(死亡率除外)显示,红细胞输注需求(OR 0.92 [0.51-1.67])、ICU LOS(OR 1.08 [0.53-2.19])、医院 LOS(OR 1.10 [0.70-1.74])或出院去向(OR 0.56 [0.29-1.11])之间无显著差异。

结论

尽管 DOAC 组的逆转率较低,ISS 较高,但术前使用 DOAC 的非颅脑损伤创伤患者的结局与术前使用华法林的患者相似。对于容易发生低能量跌倒类型损伤的人群,可能需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来评估 DOAC 和华法林的相对安全性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验