文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

围术期和重症监护常规医院数据构建衰弱指数

Development of a Frailty Index from Routine Hospital Data in Perioperative and Critical Care.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Centre for Integrated Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Dec;68(12):2831-2838. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16788. Epub 2020 Aug 20.


DOI:10.1111/jgs.16788
PMID:32816314
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Frailty is common in surgical and intensive care unit (ICU) populations, yet it is not routinely measured. Frailty indices are able to quantify this condition across a range of health deficits. We aimed to develop a frailty index (FI) from routinely collected hospital data in a surgical and ICU population. DESIGN: Prospective observational single-center cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral metropolitan Australian hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 336 individuals aged 65 and older undergoing surgery or aged 50 and older admitted to the ICU. MEASUREMENTS: Routine admission health data were used to derive an FI comprising 36 health deficits. We examined the FI correlation with existing frailty tools (Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS] and Edmonton Frail Scale [EFS]) and assessed its predictive ability for negative outcomes including 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Median FI was .17 (interquartile range [IQR]) = .10-.24) for ICU patients and .17 (IQR = .11-.25) for surgical patients; maximum FI was .58, and 25% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.4-29.6) of patients overall were diagnosed with frailty (FI score ≥.25). Correlation was strong between the FI and the EFS: ρ = .76 (95% CI = .70-.83) for ICU patients and .71 (95% CI = .64-.78) for surgical patients, and the CFS was .77 (95% CI = .70-.84) for ICU patients and .72 (95% CI = .65-.79) for surgical patients. The FI had good discriminative ability for prediction of 30-day mortality in ICU patients (multivariate odds ratio for each increase in FI of .1 = 2.04 [95% CI = 1.19-3.48]), comparable with the performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score (ICU patients) and the Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity score (surgical patients). CONCLUSION: It is feasible to construct an FI from hospital admission data in a cohort of critically ill and surgical patients.

摘要

背景/目的:虚弱在外科和重症监护病房(ICU)人群中很常见,但并未常规测量。虚弱指数能够量化各种健康缺陷的状况。我们旨在从外科和 ICU 人群中常规收集的医院数据中开发一种虚弱指数(FI)。 设计:前瞻性观察性单中心队列研究。 地点:澳大利亚大都市三级转诊医院。 参与者:共有 336 名年龄在 65 岁及以上接受手术或年龄在 50 岁及以上入住 ICU 的患者。 测量方法:使用常规入院健康数据得出一个包含 36 个健康缺陷的 FI。我们检查了 FI 与现有虚弱工具(临床虚弱量表[CFS]和埃德蒙顿虚弱量表[EFS])的相关性,并评估了其对负面结果的预测能力,包括 30 天死亡率。 结果:ICU 患者的 FI 中位数为.17(四分位距[IQR] =.10-.24),外科患者为.17(IQR =.11-.25);FI 的最大值为.58,总体而言,25%(95%置信区间[CI] = 10.4-29.6)的患者被诊断为虚弱(FI 得分≥.25)。FI 与 EFS 之间的相关性很强:ICU 患者为 ρ =.76(95% CI =.70-.83),外科患者为.71(95% CI =.64-.78),CFS 为 ICU 患者为.77(95% CI =.70-.84),外科患者为.72(95% CI =.65-.79)。FI 对 ICU 患者 30 天死亡率的预测具有良好的区分能力(FI 每增加 0.1 的多变量优势比为 2.04[95%CI=1.19-3.48]),与急性生理学和慢性健康评估 III 评分(ICU 患者)和朴茨茅斯生理和手术严重程度评分死亡率和发病率评分(外科患者)相当。 结论:从危重症和外科患者队列的入院数据中构建 FI 是可行的。

相似文献

[1]
Development of a Frailty Index from Routine Hospital Data in Perioperative and Critical Care.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020-12

[2]
Routine Frailty Screening in Critical Illness: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Australia and New Zealand.

Chest. 2021-10

[3]
Frailty, Outcomes, Recovery and Care Steps of Critically Ill Patients (FORECAST): a prospective, multi-centre, cohort study.

Intensive Care Med. 2024-7

[4]
Frailty in very old critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand: a population-based cohort study.

Med J Aust. 2019-9-5

[5]
The Prognostic Performance of Frailty for Delirium and Functional Decline in Vascular Surgery Patients.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021-3

[6]
Frailty and Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Comparison of Different Frailty Measures.

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017-6-3

[7]
Complementing chronic frailty assessment at hospital admission with an electronic frailty index (FI-Laboratory) comprising routine blood test results.

CMAJ. 2020-1-6

[8]
Comparison of the predictive ability of clinical frailty scale and hospital frailty risk score to determine long-term survival in critically ill patients: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.

Crit Care. 2022-5-3

[9]
Assessing the Usefulness and Validity of Frailty Markers in Critically Ill Adults.

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017-6

[10]
Contributors to frailty in critical illness: Multi-dimensional analysis of the Clinical Frailty Scale.

J Crit Care. 2019-5-2

引用本文的文献

[1]
Frailty, Outcomes, Recovery and Care Steps of Critically Ill Patients (FORECAST): a prospective, multi-centre, cohort study.

Intensive Care Med. 2024-7

[2]
Causal association between genetically predicted circulating immune cell counts and frailty: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Front Immunol. 2024

[3]
Methods of Assessing Frailty in the Critically Ill: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.

Gerontology. 2022

[4]
Development of an Electronic Frailty Index for Hospitalized Older Adults in Sweden.

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022-11-21

[5]
Automated Frailty Screening At-Scale for Pre-Operative Risk Stratification Using the Electronic Frailty Index.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021-5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索