Orthopedics. 2020 Nov 1;43(6):e492-e497. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20200812-03. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
Although patient-reported outcome measures use objective evaluations of impairment to focus on subjective responses, these measures may not necessarily reflect patient satisfaction with the outcome or the care provided. The goal of this study was to systematically review the available literature to assess patient satisfaction after total shoulder arthroplasty. Two investigators systematically reviewed the MEDLINE database for articles on satisfaction after this procedure. This study included 47 articles. The most commonly used method for assessing satisfaction was an ordinal scale (27 studies, 57.4%). Of the studies, 27 (57.5%) differentiated between patient satisfaction with the care provided and with the outcome achieved. Reported satisfaction rates after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty ranged from 75% to 100%. For the included studies, increasing age, workers' compensation status, depression, opioid use, and visual analog scale pain score were the only preoperative factors that were significantly associated with worse postoperative satisfaction. Postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test score, Subjective Shoulder Value score, Short Form-36 mental component score, range of motion, visual analog scale pain score, and ability to perform activities of daily living showed a significant association with postoperative satisfaction. Studies of satisfaction after total shoulder arthroplasty are of low evidence levels. Although overall patient satisfaction is high, there is no standardized method for measuring satisfaction. For the identified studies, the most common assessment method was an ordinal scale that consists of qualitative values representing increasing levels of satisfaction. Orthopedic surgeons are increasingly expected to demonstrate the value of procedures, and a uniform and validated method of assessing patient satisfaction is needed. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):e492-e497.].
尽管患者报告的结局测量使用客观的损伤评估来关注主观反应,但这些测量结果可能并不一定反映患者对结局或所提供护理的满意度。本研究的目的是系统地回顾现有文献,以评估全肩关节置换术后患者的满意度。两名调查员系统地回顾了 MEDLINE 数据库中关于该手术术后满意度的文章。本研究共纳入 47 篇文章。评估满意度最常用的方法是等级量表(27 项研究,占 57.4%)。在这些研究中,27 项研究(57.5%)区分了患者对所提供护理的满意度和对所获得结局的满意度。解剖全肩关节置换术后的报告满意度从 75%到 100%不等。在纳入的研究中,年龄增长、工人赔偿状况、抑郁、阿片类药物使用和视觉模拟量表疼痛评分是与术后满意度较差显著相关的唯一术前因素。术后美国肩肘外科评分、简单肩部测试评分、主观肩部价值评分、短式健康调查 36 项精神成分评分、活动范围、视觉模拟量表疼痛评分和日常生活活动能力与术后满意度显著相关。全肩关节置换术后满意度的研究证据水平较低。尽管总体患者满意度较高,但目前还没有标准化的满意度测量方法。在所确定的研究中,最常见的评估方法是等级量表,由代表满意度递增的定性值组成。矫形外科医生越来越需要证明手术的价值,因此需要一种统一和有效的评估患者满意度的方法。[骨科。2020;43(6):e492-e497.]。