J Sport Rehabil. 2020 Aug 19;30(3):422-429. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0344.
Contexts: Directing an individual's attention to the effect of the movements (external focus) has been shown to improve performance than directing attention to body movements (internal focus). However, the effect of attentional focus instructions specific to movement quality has not been investigated thoroughly.
To compare the effects of internal and external focus instructions specific to body movements.
Mixed design, 2 (sex) × 2 (instructions).
Laboratory setting.
A total of 40 participants (males, n = 20; mean [SD]; age = 22.0 [2.19] y; height = 179.33 [5.90] cm; mass = 77.7 [13.04] kg; females, n = 20; age = 22.0 [3.87] y; height = 164.84 [5.80] cm; mass = 71.48 [20.66] kg) were recruited.
Participants completed 2 consecutive jumps (ie, a forward jump from a height and then a maximal vertical jump) with internal focus and external focus instructions. External focus was elicited by placing pieces of tape on the participants' legs.
Landing quality was measured by the Landing Error Scoring System to assess movement quality, and the vertical jump height was measured by Vertec.
The performance results showed that the external focus condition resulted in superior vertical jump height compared with the internal focus condition (P < .05). Although landing quality did not show significant differences between 2 conditions, the effect size (η2 = .09) indicated that landing quality was better when participants adopted an external, rather than an internal focus of attention (P = .07).
The body-oriented instructions can be provided externally by adding artificial external cues and directing attention to them. Importantly, the findings were evident in a qualitative assessment that can be adopted by practitioners. The results suggest that practitioners should adopt an external focus cue for performance and also consider using an external focus for movement quality.
背景:将个体的注意力引导到运动的效果上(外部焦点)已被证明比将注意力引导到身体运动上(内部焦点)更能提高表现。然而,针对运动质量的注意力焦点特定指令的效果尚未得到彻底研究。
比较针对身体运动的内部和外部焦点指令的效果。
混合设计,2(性别)×2(指令)。
实验室环境。
共有 40 名参与者(男性,n=20;平均[标准差];年龄=22.0[2.19]岁;身高=179.33[5.90]厘米;体重=77.7[13.04]公斤;女性,n=20;年龄=22.0[3.87]岁;身高=164.84[5.80]厘米;体重=71.48[20.66]公斤)被招募。
参与者完成了 2 次连续跳跃(即从一定高度向前跳跃,然后进行最大垂直跳跃),同时给予内部焦点和外部焦点指令。外部焦点通过在参与者的腿部放置胶带来引发。
着陆质量通过着陆错误评分系统进行测量,以评估运动质量,垂直跳跃高度通过 Vertec 进行测量。
表现结果表明,与内部焦点条件相比,外部焦点条件导致垂直跳跃高度更高(P<.05)。尽管着陆质量在 2 种条件之间没有显示出显著差异,但效果大小(η2=0.09)表明,当参与者采用外部而不是内部注意力焦点时,着陆质量更好(P=.07)。
身体导向的指令可以通过添加人为的外部线索并将注意力引导到这些线索上来从外部提供。重要的是,这些发现是在定性评估中明显的,实践人员可以采用这种评估方法。研究结果表明,实践人员应该采用外部焦点提示来提高表现,同时也考虑将外部焦点用于运动质量。