• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新审视关于态度欺骗时的认知过程:一项复制研究。

Cognitive processes during deception about attitudes revisited: a replication study.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Bonn, 53111 Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 Oct 8;15(8):839-848. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa107.

DOI:10.1093/scan/nsaa107
PMID:32820342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7543939/
Abstract

Event-related potential (ERP) studies about deception often apply recognition tasks. It remains questionable whether reported ERP patterns and cognitive processes can be generalized to other contexts. As the study by Johnson et al. (2008) fills this gap by investigating deception regarding attitudes, we tried to replicate it. Participants (N = 99) were instructed to lie or tell the truth about their attitudes. We obtained the same results as Johnson et al. (2008): lies were accompanied by enhanced medial frontal negativities (MFN) and suppressed late positive components (LPCs) indicating that lying relied on stronger cognitive control processes and response conflicts than being honest. The amplitudes of pre-response positivities (PRP) were reduced for lies implying that lies about attitudes were accompanied by strategic monitoring. MFN amplitudes increased and LPC amplitudes decreased for lies about positively valued items revealing that lying about positively valued items is cognitively more challenging than lying about negatively valued items. As a new finding, MFN, LPC and PRP components were neither moderated by Machiavellianism nor by changes in the attitude ratings. The results indicate that LPC, MFN and PRP components are reliable indicators of the cognitive processes used during deception and that it is worthwhile to investigate them in further deception contexts.

摘要

事件相关电位(ERP)研究经常涉及欺骗,通常采用识别任务。然而,报告的 ERP 模式和认知过程是否可以推广到其他情境仍然存在疑问。由于 Johnson 等人(2008 年)的研究填补了这一空白,他们研究了关于态度的欺骗,因此我们试图对其进行复制。参与者(N=99)被指示就其态度说谎或说实话。我们得到了与 Johnson 等人(2008 年)相同的结果:说谎伴随着内侧额负波(MFN)增强和晚期正成分(LPC)抑制,表明说谎比诚实更依赖于更强的认知控制过程和反应冲突。说谎时的预反应正波(PRP)幅度减小,表明关于态度的谎言伴随着策略性监测。对于涉及积极评价项目的谎言,MFN 幅度增加,LPC 幅度减小,这表明关于积极评价项目的谎言比关于消极评价项目的谎言在认知上更具挑战性。作为一个新的发现,MFN、LPC 和 PRP 成分既不受马基雅维利主义的调节,也不受态度评价变化的调节。这些结果表明,LPC、MFN 和 PRP 成分是欺骗过程中使用的认知过程的可靠指标,值得进一步研究欺骗情境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d3/7543939/addcefd34a7f/nsaa107f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d3/7543939/fc5dcba9f0c9/nsaa107f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d3/7543939/a972f80b14ec/nsaa107f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d3/7543939/5cf290deb542/nsaa107f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d3/7543939/08ece84df759/nsaa107f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d3/7543939/eb1671bc2d4b/nsaa107f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d3/7543939/addcefd34a7f/nsaa107f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d3/7543939/fc5dcba9f0c9/nsaa107f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d3/7543939/a972f80b14ec/nsaa107f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d3/7543939/5cf290deb542/nsaa107f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d3/7543939/08ece84df759/nsaa107f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d3/7543939/eb1671bc2d4b/nsaa107f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55d3/7543939/addcefd34a7f/nsaa107f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Cognitive processes during deception about attitudes revisited: a replication study.重新审视关于态度欺骗时的认知过程:一项复制研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 Oct 8;15(8):839-848. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa107.
2
The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.冲突中的自我:执行过程在关于态度的真实和欺骗性回应中的作用。
Neuroimage. 2008 Jan 1;39(1):469-82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.032. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
3
Influence of age on the effects of lying on memory.年龄对说谎对记忆影响的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2019 Jul;133:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
4
Does deception involve more cognitive control than truth-telling? Meta-analyses of N2 and MFN ERP studies.欺骗是否比说实话需要更多的认知控制?N2 和 MFN ERP 研究的荟萃分析。
Psychophysiology. 2023 Oct;60(10):e14333. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14333. Epub 2023 May 16.
5
Individual differences in ERPs during deception: Observing vs. demonstrating behavior leading to a small social conflict.欺骗过程中 ERP 的个体差异:观察与表现导致小的社会冲突的行为。
Biol Psychol. 2020 Feb;150:107830. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107830. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
6
The motor cost of telling lies: electrocortical signatures and personality foundations of spontaneous deception.说谎的心理成本:自发欺骗的脑电特征与人格基础
Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(6):573-89. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.934394. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
7
A truth that's told with bad intent: an ERP study of deception.带着不良意图讲述的真相:一项关于欺骗的事件相关电位研究。
Cognition. 2010 Jan;114(1):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.014.
8
Tell me sweet little lies: An event-related potentials study on the processing of social lies.对我撒些甜蜜的小谎:一项关于社交谎言加工的事件相关电位研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Aug;16(4):616-25. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0418-3.
9
Unfolding the spatial and temporal neural processing of lying about face familiarity.揭示关于面孔熟悉度说谎的时空神经处理过程。
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Apr;25(4):927-36. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht284. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
10
Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study.练习对用于真实和欺骗性反应的执行过程的不同影响:一项事件相关脑电位研究。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):386-404. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.011. Epub 2005 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Cortical oscillations and event-related brain potentials during the preparation and execution of deceptive behavior.欺骗行为准备和执行过程中的皮层振荡和事件相关脑电位。
Psychophysiology. 2024 Dec;61(12):e14695. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14695. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
2
Replicable patterns of causal information flow between hippocampus and prefrontal cortex during spatial navigation and spatial-verbal memory formation.在空间导航和空间言语记忆形成过程中,海马体和前额叶皮层之间因果信息流的可复制模式。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Nov 21;32(23):5343-5361. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac018.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual differences in ERPs during deception: Observing vs. demonstrating behavior leading to a small social conflict.欺骗过程中 ERP 的个体差异:观察与表现导致小的社会冲突的行为。
Biol Psychol. 2020 Feb;150:107830. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107830. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
2
The Dark Triad and Deception Perceptions.黑暗三性格与欺骗认知
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 13;10:1811. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01811. eCollection 2019.
3
A meta-analysis of the P3 amplitude in tasks requiring deception in legal and social contexts.在法律和社会背景下需要欺骗的任务中的 P3 振幅的荟萃分析。
Brain Cogn. 2019 Oct;135:103564. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
4
The effect of countermeasures against the reaction time based concealed information test on the P300 index of knowledge recognition: A combined RT and P300-based test.基于反应时对策的隐藏信息测验对知识识别 P300 指标的影响:一种基于 RT 和 P300 的联合测验。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 Dec;134:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
5
Detection of deception: Event-related potential markers of attention and cognitive control during intentional false responses.欺骗检测:故意虚假反应过程中注意力和认知控制的事件相关电位标记
Psychophysiology. 2018 Jun;55(6):e13047. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13047. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
6
Lying takes time: A meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception.说谎需要时间:关于说谎反应时测谎的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Apr;143(4):428-453. doi: 10.1037/bul0000087. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
7
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.心理学. 心理科学可重复性的评估.
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.
8
The cognitive mechanisms underlying deception: an event-related potential study.欺骗背后的认知机制:一项事件相关电位研究。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Mar;95(3):395-405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
9
The motor cost of telling lies: electrocortical signatures and personality foundations of spontaneous deception.说谎的心理成本:自发欺骗的脑电特征与人格基础
Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(6):573-89. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.934394. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
10
Pants on fire: the electrophysiological signature of telling a lie.火烧裤子:说谎的电生理特征。
Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(6):562-72. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.934392. Epub 2014 Jun 27.