• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CYP2C19基因指导的抗血小板治疗在心血管和脑血管不良事件风险患者中的临床应用:新证据综述

Clinical Utility of CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients at Risk of Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events: A Review of Emerging Evidence.

作者信息

Gower Megan N, Ratner Lindsay R, Williams Alexis K, Rossi Joseph S, Stouffer George A, Lee Craig R

机构信息

Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Division of Cardiology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2020 Jul 27;13:239-252. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S231475. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/PGPM.S231475
PMID:32821149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7419635/
Abstract

In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the standard of care is dual antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y inhibitor (clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) and aspirin. Current clinical practice guidelines now recommend more potent P2Y inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) over clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, clopidogrel remains the most commonly prescribed P2Y inhibitor in the setting of PCI and is also the preferred agent in the treatment and secondary prevention of stroke. Clopidogrel is a prodrug that requires bioactivation by the CYP2C19 enzyme. It has been shown that clopidogrel use in patients who are CYP2C19 no function allele carriers are associated with impaired antiplatelet inhibition and a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Compared to clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor clinical response is not impacted by CYP2C19 genotype. Even with a demonstrated increased risk of adverse outcomes in CYP2C19 no function allele carriers treated with clopidogrel, routine implementation of CYP2C19 genotyping to guide antiplatelet therapy selection has remained controversial and has not been widely adopted. Recent results from multiple prospective randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials investigating the use of CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy following PCI have advanced the evidence base demonstrating the clinical utility of this strategy. Multiple recent studies have examined the effects of CYP2C19 genotype on clopidogrel outcomes in the setting of stroke and neurointerventional procedures. In this review, we discern the clinical utility of using CYP2C19 genotype testing to guide antiplatelet therapy prescribing by evaluating the impact of CYP2C19 genotype-guided selection of antiplatelet therapy on clinical outcomes, summarizing emerging data from cardiovascular and neurology clinical studies, and discussing implications for clinical practice guidelines, remaining knowledge gaps and future research directions.

摘要

在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者中,标准治疗方案是使用P2Y12抑制剂(氯吡格雷、普拉格雷或替格瑞洛)和阿司匹林进行双联抗血小板治疗。目前的临床实践指南现在推荐在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)中使用更强效的P2Y12抑制剂(普拉格雷或替格瑞洛)而非氯吡格雷。然而,氯吡格雷仍是PCI中最常用的P2Y12抑制剂,也是中风治疗和二级预防的首选药物。氯吡格雷是一种前体药物,需要通过CYP2C19酶进行生物活化。已有研究表明,在携带CYP2C19无功能等位基因的患者中使用氯吡格雷与抗血小板抑制受损以及发生主要不良心血管和脑血管事件的风险较高相关。与氯吡格雷相比,普拉格雷和替格瑞洛的临床反应不受CYP2C19基因型的影响。即使在用氯吡格雷治疗的CYP2C19无功能等位基因携带者中已证实不良结局风险增加,但常规实施CYP2C19基因分型以指导抗血小板治疗选择仍存在争议,尚未被广泛采用。多项前瞻性随机和非随机临床试验关于PCI后使用CYP2C19基因型指导抗血小板治疗的最新结果推进了证据基础,证明了该策略的临床实用性。最近的多项研究探讨了CYP2C19基因型对中风和神经介入手术中氯吡格雷疗效的影响。在本综述中,我们通过评估CYP2C19基因型指导的抗血小板治疗选择对临床结局的影响、总结心血管和神经学临床研究的新数据以及讨论对临床实践指南的影响、尚存的知识空白和未来研究方向,来识别使用CYP2C19基因型检测指导抗血小板治疗处方的临床实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc2/7419635/6960801a60d1/PGPM-13-239-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc2/7419635/3ac55631af04/PGPM-13-239-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc2/7419635/6960801a60d1/PGPM-13-239-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc2/7419635/3ac55631af04/PGPM-13-239-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc2/7419635/6960801a60d1/PGPM-13-239-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical Utility of CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients at Risk of Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events: A Review of Emerging Evidence.CYP2C19基因指导的抗血小板治疗在心血管和脑血管不良事件风险患者中的临床应用:新证据综述
Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2020 Jul 27;13:239-252. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S231475. eCollection 2020.
2
Clinical Utility of CYP2C19 Genotyping to Guide Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With an Acute Coronary Syndrome or Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.CYP2C19 基因分型指导急性冠状动脉综合征或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者抗血小板治疗的临床实用性。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019 Apr;39(4):647-652. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.118.311963.
3
Pharmacogenetics of P2Y receptor inhibitors.P2Y 受体抑制剂的药物遗传学。
Pharmacotherapy. 2023 Feb;43(2):158-175. doi: 10.1002/phar.2758. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
4
Multisite Investigation of Outcomes With Implementation of CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.多中心研究:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后实施 CYP2C19 基因指导的抗血小板治疗的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 22;11(2):181-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.022. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
5
Clinical Outcomes and Sustainability of Using Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后使用基于基因型的抗血小板治疗的临床结果和可持续性。
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018 Apr;11(4):e002069. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.117.002069.
6
Impact of the CYP2C19*17 Allele on Outcomes in Patients Receiving Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.CYP2C19*17 等位基因对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后接受基于基因型的抗血小板治疗患者结局的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Mar;109(3):705-715. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2039. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
7
Economic Evaluations of CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy Compared to the Universal Use of Antiplatelets in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review.CYP2C19 基因指导的抗血小板治疗与急性冠状动脉综合征患者普遍使用抗血小板药物的经济学评价:系统评价。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2020 May;25(3):201-211. doi: 10.1177/1074248420902298. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
8
CYP2C19 LOF and GOF-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.CYP2C19功能缺失和功能增强指导下的急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血小板治疗:一项成本效益分析
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2017 Feb;31(1):39-49. doi: 10.1007/s10557-016-6705-y.
9
Impact of Implementing CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy on P2Y Inhibitor Selection and Clinical Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Real-World Study in China.实施CYP2C19基因导向的抗血小板治疗对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者P2Y抑制剂选择及临床结局的影响:一项中国的真实世界研究
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jan 20;11:582929. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.582929. eCollection 2020.
10
Cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention informed by real-world data.基于真实世界数据的 CYP2C19 指导的抗血小板治疗在急性冠状动脉综合征和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中的成本效益。
Pharmacogenomics J. 2020 Oct;20(5):724-735. doi: 10.1038/s41397-020-0162-5. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of Variants in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease from the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau in Southwestern China.中国西南部云贵高原心血管疾病患者中变异体的患病率
Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2025 May 2;18:105-113. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S509794. eCollection 2025.
2
Association of c.681G>A (rs4244285) Loss-of-function Allele with Cardiovascular Disease Risk in the Kosovo Population.科索沃人群中c.681G>A(rs4244285)功能丧失等位基因与心血管疾病风险的关联。
Balkan J Med Genet. 2025 Mar 6;27(2):77-85. doi: 10.2478/bjmg-2024-0015. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing a Neurointerventional Procedure.

本文引用的文献

1
Enrollment of Older Patients, Women, and Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups in Contemporary Acute Coronary Syndrome Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.当代急性冠状动脉综合征临床试验中老年患者、女性和种族/少数民族群体的入组情况:一项系统评价。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):714-722. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0359.
2
Routine CYP2C19 Genotyping to Adjust Thienopyridine Treatment After Primary PCI for STEMI: Results of the GIANT Study.常规 CYP2C19 基因分型以调整 STEMI 患者初次 PCI 后的噻吩吡啶治疗:GIANT 研究结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 9;13(5):621-630. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.01.219.
3
Derivation, Validation, and Prognostic Utility of a Prediction Rule for Nonresponse to Clopidogrel: The ABCD-GENE Score.
CYP2C19基因分型指导的抗血小板治疗与接受神经介入手术患者的临床结局
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan;18(1):e70131. doi: 10.1111/cts.70131.
4
Managing thrombosis risk in flow diversion: A review of antiplatelet approaches.血流导向治疗中血栓形成风险的管理:抗血小板治疗方法综述
Neuroradiol J. 2025 Jan 8:19714009251313515. doi: 10.1177/19714009251313515.
5
Real-world evaluation of guided antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm repair.颅内动脉瘤修复术后患者的抗血小板治疗的真实世界评估。
Pharmacogenomics. 2024;25(12-13):503-513. doi: 10.1080/14622416.2024.2406213. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
6
Genotype Is Associated With Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Black Patients Treated With Clopidogrel Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.基因分型与接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的黑人患者氯吡格雷治疗的不良心血管结局相关。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jun 18;13(12):e033791. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033791. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
7
Is Haplotype Relevant for Efficacy and Bleeding Risk in Clopidogrel-Treated Patients?血小板糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 受体拮抗剂治疗的患者中,单体型与疗效和出血风险相关吗?
Genes (Basel). 2024 May 10;15(5):607. doi: 10.3390/genes15050607.
8
The Impact of CYP2C19 Genotype on the Platelet Reactivity Index (PRI) among Chronic Coronary Syndromes (CCS) Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): Affectability of Rapid Genetic Testing.CYP2C19基因分型对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS)患者血小板反应指数(PRI)的影响:快速基因检测的敏感性
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2025 Apr;39(2):347-356. doi: 10.1007/s10557-024-07544-6. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
9
Contemporary Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapies for Secondary Stroke Prevention: A Narrative Review of Current Literature and Guidelines.当代抗血小板和抗凝治疗用于二级卒中预防:当前文献和指南的叙述性综述。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2023 May;23(5):235-262. doi: 10.1007/s11910-023-01266-2. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
10
Evaluation of race and ethnicity disparities in outcome studies of genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy.基因分型指导抗血小板治疗结局研究中的种族和民族差异评估。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 23;9:991646. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.991646. eCollection 2022.
抗血小板药物氯吡格雷无应答预测评分:ABCD-GENE 评分的推导、验证及预后价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 9;13(5):606-617. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.01.226.
4
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计-2020 更新:来自美国心脏协会的报告》。
Circulation. 2020 Mar 3;141(9):e139-e596. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
5
Prospective Genotyping to Guide Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后前瞻性基因分型指导抗血小板治疗:一项实用随机临床试验。
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2020 Feb;13(1):e002640. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.119.002640. Epub 2020 Jan 12.
6
Consensus statements and recommendations from the ESO-Karolinska Stroke Update Conference, Stockholm 11-13 November 2018.2018年11月11日至13日于斯德哥尔摩举行的欧洲卒中组织-卡罗林斯卡卒中最新进展会议的共识声明与建议
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Dec;4(4):307-317. doi: 10.1177/2396987319863606. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
7
Antithrombotic therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention from the Japanese perspective.从日本视角看经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的抗栓治疗
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020 Jan;35(1):19-29. doi: 10.1007/s12928-019-00633-6. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
8
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:2018 年急性缺血性脑卒中早期管理指南的更新:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会发布的医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
9
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.2019年欧洲心脏病学会慢性冠状动脉综合征诊断和管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.
10
Pharmacogenomic polygenic response score predicts ischaemic events and cardiovascular mortality in clopidogrel-treated patients.基于药物基因组学的多基因反应评分可预测氯吡格雷治疗患者的缺血事件和心血管死亡率。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020 Jul 1;6(4):203-210. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz045.