• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响洪灾保护应对行为的因素:以中国深圳为例。

Influential Factors Affecting Protective Coping Behaviors of Flood Disaster: A Case Study in Shenzhen, China.

机构信息

Institute of Management Science, Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China.

Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10012, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 16;17(16):5945. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165945.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17165945
PMID:32824324
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7459972/
Abstract

As the risk of urban flooding increases worldwide, floods seriously endanger the safety of people's lives and property. Understanding the protective coping behaviors of the public in flood disasters is crucial to the implementation of effective flood mitigation measures and flood risk management. In this study, influential factors affecting protective coping behaviors in the face of flood disasters were identified, and the effects of these factors were discussed as well. Shenzhen City in China was selected as the study area, in which a questionnaire survey of 339 respondents was carried out in three flood-prone districts. Correlation analysis was conducted to preselect potential influential factors. Then, two linear regression models were established to identify main influential factors and to explore the interaction effects of these factors. The results indicated that age, monthly income, flood experience, trust in government and insurance willingness were main influential factors of protective coping behaviors. Trust in government had the highest positive correlation coefficient, while monthly income and age were negatively associated with protective coping behaviors. The interaction between insurance willingness and monthly income jointly affected protective coping behaviors of the public. The findings of this study could help authorities better understand the public's intention to cope with flood and design effective risk reduction measures, not only for Shenzhen, but also for many other similar cities that facing with the same situation.

摘要

随着全球城市内涝风险的增加,洪水严重威胁着人们的生命财产安全。了解公众在洪灾中的保护应对行为对于实施有效的洪灾缓解措施和洪灾风险管理至关重要。本研究旨在识别影响公众在洪灾中保护应对行为的因素,并探讨这些因素的影响。选择中国深圳市作为研究区域,在三个易受洪水影响的地区对 339 名受访者进行了问卷调查。通过相关分析对潜在的影响因素进行了预筛选。然后,建立了两个线性回归模型来识别主要影响因素,并探讨这些因素的交互作用。结果表明,年龄、月收入、洪水经历、对政府的信任和保险意愿是保护应对行为的主要影响因素。对政府的信任具有最高的正相关系数,而月收入和年龄与保护应对行为呈负相关。保险意愿和月收入之间的交互作用共同影响了公众的保护应对行为。本研究结果有助于当局更好地了解公众应对洪水的意愿,设计有效的减灾措施,不仅对深圳,对许多面临类似情况的其他类似城市也具有借鉴意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7416/7459972/4fd68adbe0cb/ijerph-17-05945-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7416/7459972/0622095ba608/ijerph-17-05945-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7416/7459972/79b3554ce9cc/ijerph-17-05945-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7416/7459972/4fd68adbe0cb/ijerph-17-05945-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7416/7459972/0622095ba608/ijerph-17-05945-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7416/7459972/79b3554ce9cc/ijerph-17-05945-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7416/7459972/4fd68adbe0cb/ijerph-17-05945-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Influential Factors Affecting Protective Coping Behaviors of Flood Disaster: A Case Study in Shenzhen, China.影响洪灾保护应对行为的因素:以中国深圳为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 16;17(16):5945. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165945.
2
Affect Path to Flood Protective Coping Behaviors using SEM based on A Survey in Shenzhen, China.基于在中国深圳的一项调查,运用 SEM 分析影响洪水防护应对行为的路径。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 3;17(3):940. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030940.
3
Flooding in semi-unformal urban areas in North Africa: Environmental and psychosocial drivers.北非半正规城市地区的洪水:环境和社会心理驱动因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jun 15;929:172486. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172486. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
4
How Can Cities Respond to Flood Disaster Risks under Multi-Scenario Simulation? A Case Study of Xiamen, China.城市如何应对多情景模拟下的洪涝灾害风险?以中国厦门为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 20;16(4):618. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040618.
5
A hybrid method for evaluating the resilience of urban road traffic network under flood disaster: An example of Nanjing, China.一种评估城市道路交通网络在洪灾下的弹性的混合方法:以中国南京为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(30):46306-46324. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19142-w. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
6
Construction of Urban Flood Disaster Emergency Management System Using Scenario Construction Technology.利用情景构建技术构建城市洪涝灾害应急管理系统。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Mar 15;2022:8048327. doi: 10.1155/2022/8048327. eCollection 2022.
7
Understanding Challenges Women Face in Flood-Affected Areas to Access Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: A Rapid Assessment from a Disaster-Torn Pakistan.了解受灾妇女获得性健康和生殖健康服务面临的挑战:来自巴基斯坦灾区的快速评估。
Biomed Res Int. 2024 Apr 1;2024:1113634. doi: 10.1155/2024/1113634. eCollection 2024.
8
Urban flooding resilience evaluation with coupled rainfall and flooding models: a small area in Kunming City, China as an example.基于耦合降雨和洪水模型的城市洪水韧性评估:以中国昆明市的一个小区域为例。
Water Sci Technol. 2023 Jun;87(11):2820-2839. doi: 10.2166/wst.2023.149.
9
Role of income and government responsiveness in reducing the death toll from floods in Indian states.收入和政府响应能力在减少印度各邦洪灾死亡人数方面的作用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 10;12(1):16978. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21334-w.
10
Coping Strategies for Landslide and Flood Disasters: A Qualitative Study of Mt. Elgon Region, Uganda.山体滑坡和洪水灾害的应对策略:乌干达埃尔贡山地区的定性研究
PLoS Curr. 2016 Jul 11;8:ecurrents.dis.4250a225860babf3601a18e33e172d8b. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.4250a225860babf3601a18e33e172d8b.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of factors in community willingness to manage floods in East Java during the pandemic.疫情期间东爪哇社区应对洪水意愿的影响因素分析。
Jamba. 2024 Jun 28;16(1):1598. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1598. eCollection 2024.
2
Flood Risk and Preventive Choices: A Framework for Studying Human Behaviors.洪水风险与预防选择:一个研究人类行为的框架
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jan 20;14(1):74. doi: 10.3390/bs14010074.

本文引用的文献

1
Unpacking Protection Motivation Theory: evidence for a separate protective and non-protective route in private flood mitigation behavior.剖析保护动机理论:私人防洪减灾行为中存在单独的保护与非保护途径的证据
J Risk Res. 2019 Jan 14;22(12):1503-1521. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2018.1485175. eCollection 2019.
2
Affect Path to Flood Protective Coping Behaviors using SEM based on A Survey in Shenzhen, China.基于在中国深圳的一项调查,运用 SEM 分析影响洪水防护应对行为的路径。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 3;17(3):940. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030940.
3
Simulating Behavioral Influences on Community Flood Risk under Future Climate Scenarios.
模拟未来气候情景下行为因素对社区洪灾风险的影响。
Risk Anal. 2020 Apr;40(4):884-898. doi: 10.1111/risa.13428. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
4
Researching natural disaster preparedness through health behavioral change models.通过健康行为改变模型研究自然灾害防范措施。
Am J Disaster Med. 2019;14(1):51-63. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.2019.0315.
5
Adoption of Individual Flood Damage Mitigation Measures in New York City: An Extension of Protection Motivation Theory.纽约市个人洪水灾害缓解措施的采用:保护动机理论的扩展。
Risk Anal. 2019 Oct;39(10):2143-2159. doi: 10.1111/risa.13318. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
6
Impact of Place Identity, Self-Efficacy and Anxiety State on the Relationship Between Coastal Flooding Risk Perception and the Willingness to Cope.场所认同、自我效能感和焦虑状态对沿海洪水风险认知与应对意愿之间关系的影响
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 11;10:499. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00499. eCollection 2019.
7
The Role of Gender in Preparedness and Response Behaviors towards Flood Risk in Serbia.性别在塞尔维亚洪水风险防范和应对行为中的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 6;15(12):2761. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122761.
8
Sustainable survival under climatic extremes: linking flood risk mitigation and coping with flood damages in rural Pakistan.在极端气候下实现可持续生存:将巴基斯坦农村的洪灾风险缓解与洪灾损失应对联系起来。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Nov;25(32):32491-32505. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3203-8. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
9
Attitudes to climate change, perceptions of disaster risk, and mitigation and adaptation behavior in Yunlin County, Taiwan.台湾云林县民众对气候变化的态度、对灾害风险的认知,以及减缓和适应行为。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Oct;26(30):30603-30613. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1358-y. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
10
Insights into Flood-Coping Appraisals of Protection Motivation Theory: Empirical Evidence from Germany and France.洪灾应对评价中的保护动机理论研究:来自德国和法国的实证证据。
Risk Anal. 2018 Jun;38(6):1239-1257. doi: 10.1111/risa.12938. Epub 2017 Nov 17.