• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国和加拿大 2015 年至 2018 年腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的趋势和结果。

Trends and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Between 2015 and 2018 in the USA and Canada.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2021 Feb;31(2):675-681. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04939-w. Epub 2020 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-020-04939-w
PMID:32827092
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given there are approximately 100,000 primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) procedures performed a year in North America, there is a need to evaluate recent trends in LSG. The objective of this study was to analyze the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) to identify trends in technical factors and patient outcomes over time.

METHODS

The MBSAQIP prospectively collects data from 854 centers in the USA and Canada. Patients undergoing primary LSG were included. Statistical analysis was performed to characterize trends in patient factors, technical factors, and 30-day postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 434,030 patients underwent primary LSG. The mean age was 44.2 (SD 12.0) years and mean body mass index was 45.1 (SD 7.8) kg/m. Baseline demographics did not vary appreciably by year. Operative time decreased from 2015 to 2018 (75.4 to 70.6 min, p < 0.001). Bougie size and stapling distance from the pylorus did not change by year. However, staple line reinforcement (66.8 to 63.2%, p < 0.001) and oversewing of the staple line (23.1 to 20.1%, p < 0.001) were less commonly performed. Postoperatively, from 2015 to 2018, there was a 45.8% relative reduction in leaks (0.48 to 0.26%, p < 0.001). There were also reductions in 30-day major complications (2.87 to 2.28%, p < 0.001), length of stay (1.72 to 1.44 days, p < 0.001), and readmissions (3.39 to 2.77%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

From 2015 to 2018, there was a decrease in staple line reinforcement and oversewing. These changes correlated with reductions in operative time, length of stay, readmission, and major complications.

摘要

背景

在北美,每年大约有 100,000 例腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG),因此需要评估 LSG 的最新趋势。本研究的目的是分析代谢和减重手术认证和质量改进计划(MBSAQIP),以确定随时间推移技术因素和患者结局的趋势。

方法

MBSAQIP 从美国和加拿大的 854 个中心前瞻性收集数据。纳入接受初次 LSG 的患者。对患者因素、技术因素和 30 天术后结局的趋势进行统计学分析。

结果

共 434,030 例患者接受了初次 LSG。平均年龄为 44.2(SD 12.0)岁,平均体重指数为 45.1(SD 7.8)kg/m2。基线人口统计学特征在不同年份无明显差异。手术时间从 2015 年到 2018 年减少(75.4 分钟至 70.6 分钟,p<0.001)。扩张器尺寸和吻合器距幽门的距离在不同年份无变化。然而,吻合线加固(66.8%至 63.2%,p<0.001)和吻合线缝合(23.1%至 20.1%,p<0.001)的应用减少。术后,2015 年至 2018 年,漏诊率相对降低了 45.8%(0.48%至 0.26%,p<0.001)。30 天主要并发症(2.87%至 2.28%,p<0.001)、住院时间(1.72 天至 1.44 天,p<0.001)和再入院率(3.39%至 2.77%,p<0.001)也有所降低。

结论

从 2015 年到 2018 年,吻合线加固和缝合的应用减少。这些变化与手术时间、住院时间、再入院率和主要并发症的减少相关。

相似文献

1
Trends and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Between 2015 and 2018 in the USA and Canada.美国和加拿大 2015 年至 2018 年腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的趋势和结果。
Obes Surg. 2021 Feb;31(2):675-681. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04939-w. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
2
Current role of staple line reinforcement in 30-day outcomes of primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of MBSAQIP data, 2015-2016 PUF.2015-2016 年 MBSAQIP 数据 PUF 分析:缝线加固在原发性腹腔镜袖状胃切除术 30 天结果中的当前作用。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Oct;14(10):1454-1461. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.06.024. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
3
Predictors and outcomes of bleed after sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of the MBSAQIP data registry.袖状胃切除术后出血的预测因素和结果:MBSAQIP 数据登记分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Oct;15(10):1675-1681. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.07.017. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
4
A Randomized Comparison Between Staple-Line Oversewing Versus No Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy.腹腔镜垂直袖状胃切除术期间吻合口加固缝合与不加固的随机对照比较
Obes Surg. 2018 Jan;28(1):218-225. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2835-y.
5
Is staple line oversewing in patients on chronic anticoagulation during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy necessary? Propensity score matching analysis using the 2015-2018 MBSAQIP.在接受慢性抗凝治疗的患者中,腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中是否需要缝扎吻合口?利用 2015-2018 年 MBSAQIP 的倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8481-8489. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09146-5. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
6
30-day outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: First analysis based on MBSAQIP.基于 MBSAQIP 的机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术 30 天结果比较:首次分析
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Jan;15(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
7
Evaluating the effect of operative technique on leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case-control study.评估手术技术对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后渗漏的影响:一项病例对照研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Apr;13(4):560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.027. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
8
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: How Do I Do It.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:我该怎么做。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Jan;30(1):2-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0452. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
9
Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in four staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review.四种吻合口加固方式下腹腔镜袖状胃切除术漏率的比较:一项系统评价
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Jul-Aug;10(4):713-23. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
10
Implications of Technical Factors in Development of Early Sleeve Stenosis After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: an Analysis Using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Database.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术术后早期袖状狭窄的技术因素影响:使用代谢和减重手术认证和质量改进计划数据库的分析。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jun;31(6):2373-2379. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05288-y. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Sleeve gastrectomy with same-day discharge: a propensity score-matched analysis of independent predictors of complication.当日出院的袖状胃切除术:并发症独立预测因素的倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11837-8.
2
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Outcome Trends Over Time: Are We Improving?机器人辅助与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术随时间推移的结果趋势:我们是否在进步?
Obes Surg. 2024 Jul;34(7):2596-2606. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07334-x. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
3
A Case of a Gastric Stent Complication Presenting With a Gastrojujenal Fistula.
一例以胃空肠瘘为表现的胃支架并发症病例。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 26;15(12):e51143. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51143. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Lacks Intrasurgeon and Intersurgeon Agreement in Technical Key Points That May Affect Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After the Procedure.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术在可能影响术后胃食管反流病的技术要点上缺乏术者内和术者间的共识。
Obes Surg. 2024 Feb;34(2):542-548. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-07016-0. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
5
The clinical effectiveness of staple line reinforcement with different matrix used in surgery.手术中使用不同基质进行吻合口加固的临床效果。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jun 7;11:1178619. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1178619. eCollection 2023.
6
ST36 acupoint injection with anisodamine for postoperative nausea and vomiting in female patients after bariatric surgery: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.ST36 穴位注射山莨菪碱治疗女性肥胖症患者术后恶心呕吐:一项前瞻性、随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):5999-6007. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10037-6. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
7
Factors Associated with Relapse of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Japanese Subjects: A Subgroup Analysis of J-SMART Study.与日本患者腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)后 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)复发相关的因素:J-SMART 研究的亚组分析。
Obes Facts. 2023;16(2):119-130. doi: 10.1159/000529546. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
8
Comparison of robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy outcomes in multiple staple line treatment modalities from 2015 to 2019: a 5-year propensity score-adjusted MBSAQIP® analysis.2015年至2019年多种吻合钉线治疗方式下机器人辅助袖状胃切除术的疗效比较:一项为期5年的倾向评分调整后的MBSAQIP®分析
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1401-1411. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09366-9. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
9
Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on bariatric surgery in North America: a retrospective analysis of 834,647 patients.新冠疫情对北美减肥手术的影响:对 834647 名患者的回顾性分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022 Jun;18(6):803-811. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.03.012. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
10
Changes in Work Ability after Weight-Loss Surgery: Results of a Longitudinal Study of Persons with Morbid Obesity before and after Bariatric Surgery.体重减轻手术后工作能力的变化:肥胖症患者接受减重手术后的纵向研究结果。
Obes Facts. 2022;15(1):36-45. doi: 10.1159/000519269. Epub 2021 Nov 8.