Department of Microbiology, Babcock University, PMB 4005, Ilisan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Department of Nature Conservation, Mangosuthu University of Technology, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2020 Aug 6;2020:4808432. doi: 10.1155/2020/4808432. eCollection 2020.
The antibacterial activity of the extracts of including -hexane extract (NHE), nondefatted methanol extract (NDME), and defatted methanol extract (DME) was investigated in this study. The NHE exhibited no antibacterial activity. The DME showed higher antibacterial activity than the NDME against the different isolates. At the highest concentration of 10 mg/mL in agar diffusion, NDME produced inhibition zones ranging from 11 to 29 mm against the microorganisms while DME produced inhibition zones ranging from 20 to 40 mm with the concentration of 10 mg/mL against the microorganisms. 0.1 mg/mL of the DME produced inhibition zones ranging between 12 and 14 mm in ATCC 35654 and ATCC 15442, respectively, while none of the isolates were inhibited by the NDME at a concentration of 1 mg/mL or less. In the agar dilution assay, the MICs of the NDME and DME ranged between 0.31 and 10 mg/mL, but more isolates were inhibited at 0.31 mg/mL of DME than those in NDME. In macrobroth assay, the MICs of the NDME ranged between 0.15 and 5.0 mg/mL and the MBCs ranged between 0.63 and 5.0 mg/mL, and the MICs of the DME ranged between 0.08 and 5.0 mg/mL and the MBCs were between 0.31 and 5.0 mg/mL. This study indicated that DME was more active with higher antibacterial activity than the NDME of this plant, and extracting the fatty portion of plant materials prior susceptibility testing would allow plant extracts to be more effective as well as justifying the use of in traditional medicine for the treatment of bacterial infections.
本研究考察了包括 - 正己烷提取物(NHE)、非脱脂甲醇提取物(NDME)和脱脂甲醇提取物(DME)在内的提取物的抗菌活性。NHE 没有显示出抗菌活性。与 NDME 相比,DME 对不同分离物表现出更高的抗菌活性。在琼脂扩散中的最高浓度为 10mg/mL 时,NDME 对微生物产生的抑制区范围为 11 至 29mm,而 DME 对微生物产生的抑制区范围为 20 至 40mm,浓度为 10mg/mL。DME 的 0.1mg/mL 对 ATCC 35654 和 ATCC 15442 分别产生 12 至 14mm 的抑制区,而 NDME 则没有在 1mg/mL 或更低的浓度下抑制任何分离物。在琼脂稀释测定中,NDME 和 DME 的 MIC 范围在 0.31 至 10mg/mL 之间,但在 0.31mg/mL 的 DME 中,比 NDME 更多的分离物被抑制。在大肉汤测定中,NDME 的 MIC 范围在 0.15 至 5.0mg/mL 之间,MBC 范围在 0.63 至 5.0mg/mL 之间,DME 的 MIC 范围在 0.08 至 5.0mg/mL 之间,MBC 范围在 0.31 至 5.0mg/mL 之间。本研究表明,DME 比植物的 NDME 更具活性,抗菌活性更高,在进行药敏试验之前提取植物材料的脂肪部分将使植物提取物更有效,并且为传统医学中使用 来治疗细菌感染提供了依据。