Rajagiri College of Social Sciences (Autonomous), Cochin, Kerala, 683104, India.
Rajagiri International Centre for Consortium Research in Social Care (ICRS), Rajagiri College of Social Sciences, Cochin, Kerala, 683104, India.
F1000Res. 2020 Jul 13;9:700. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.25073.1. eCollection 2020.
The burden of disability on individuals and society is enormous in India, and informal care systems try to reduce this burden. This study investigated the association between neighbourhood cohesion and disability in a community-based population in Kerala, India. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have examined this association in India. A cross-sectional household survey was conducted with 997 participants aged 30 years and above, in Kerala. Neighbourhood cohesion was assessed by three scales: trust, community participation, and perceived safety. Functional ability was measured by WHODAS 2.0. Explanatory covariates included chronic disease conditions, age, gender, education, income, and mental health conditions. Of 997 participants (37% male; mean age, 53.9 [range, 30-90] years), the majority were married or cohabiting. Univariate analysis showed functional ability to be positively associated with most demographic and health characteristics. However, after adjustment, only social cohesion, age, income, education, chronic diseases and mental health conditions remained significant. Mediation analysis showed the effect of personal and health characteristics on functional ability as mediated by social cohesion. Social cohesion is an important moderator of functional ability. Interventions targeting the creation of stronger ties among neighbours and a sense of belonging should be scaled-up and evaluated in future research.
在印度,残疾给个人和社会带来了巨大的负担,非正规护理系统试图减轻这种负担。本研究调查了印度喀拉拉邦社区人群中邻里凝聚力与残疾之间的关系。据我们所知,以前没有研究在印度研究过这种关联。
本研究采用横断面家庭调查,在喀拉拉邦对 997 名年龄在 30 岁及以上的参与者进行了调查。邻里凝聚力通过三个量表来评估:信任、社区参与和感知安全。功能能力通过 WHODAS 2.0 来衡量。解释性协变量包括慢性病状况、年龄、性别、教育、收入和心理健康状况。
在 997 名参与者中(37%为男性;平均年龄为 53.9[范围为 30-90]岁),大多数人已婚或同居。单变量分析表明,功能能力与大多数人口统计学和健康特征呈正相关。然而,调整后,只有社会凝聚力、年龄、收入、教育、慢性病和心理健康状况仍然显著。中介分析表明,个人和健康特征对功能能力的影响是通过社会凝聚力中介的。
社会凝聚力是功能能力的一个重要调节因素。未来的研究应该扩大并评估针对增强邻里之间联系和归属感的干预措施。