Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York.
South County Orthopaedics, Ortho Rhode Island, Wakefield, Rhode Island.
J Knee Surg. 2022 Mar;35(4):409-415. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715126. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
The learning curve has been established for robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) during the first month of use; however, there have been no studies evaluating this on a longer term. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare operative times for three cohorts during the first year following adoption of RATKA (initial, 6 months, and 1 year) and a prior cohort of manual TKA. We investigated both mean operative times and the variability of operative time in each cohort. This is a learning curve study comparing a single surgeon's experience using RAKTA. The study groups were made up of two cohorts of 60 cementless RATKAs performed at ∼6 months and 1 year of use. A learning curve was created based on the mean operative times and individual operative times were stratified into different cohorts for comparison. Study groups were compared with the surgeon's initial group of 20 cemented RATKAs and 60 cementless manual cases. Descriptive numbers were compiled and mean operative times were compared using Student's -tests for significant differences with a -value of < 0.05. The mean surgical times continued to decrease after 6 months of RATKA. In 1 year, the surgeon was performing 88% of the RATKA between 50 and 69 minutes. The initial cohort and 1-year robotic-assisted mean operative times were 81 and 62 minutes, respectively ( < 0.00001). Mean 6-month robotic-assisted operative times were similar to manual times ( = 0.12). A significant lower time was found between the mean operative times for the 1-year robotic-assisted and manual ( = 0.008) TKAs. The data show continued improvement of operative times at 6 months and 1 year when using this new technology. The results of this study are important because they demonstrate how the complexity of a technology which initially increases operative time can be overcome and become more time-effective than conventional techniques.
机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(RATKA)在使用的第一个月内已经建立了学习曲线;然而,目前还没有研究评估其长期效果。因此,本研究的目的是比较 RATKA 采用后第一年的三个队列的手术时间(初始、6 个月和 1 年)和先前的手动 TKA 队列。我们研究了每个队列的平均手术时间和手术时间的可变性。这是一项比较单一外科医生使用 RAKTA 经验的学习曲线研究。研究组由两组各 60 例非骨水泥 RATKA 组成,分别在使用后约 6 个月和 1 年进行。根据平均手术时间创建了学习曲线,将个体手术时间分层到不同的队列中进行比较。将研究组与外科医生最初的 20 例骨水泥 RATKA 和 60 例非骨水泥手动病例进行比较。汇总描述性数字,并使用学生 t 检验比较平均手术时间,以确定具有统计学意义的差异,显著性水平为 α < 0.05。在使用 RATKA 6 个月后,手术时间继续减少。在 1 年内,外科医生在 50 到 69 分钟之间完成了 88%的 RATKA。初始队列和 1 年机器人辅助平均手术时间分别为 81 和 62 分钟(p < 0.00001)。机器人辅助 6 个月的平均手术时间与手动手术时间相似(p = 0.12)。机器人辅助 1 年和手动 TKA 的平均手术时间之间存在显著差异(p = 0.008)。数据显示,使用这项新技术,手术时间在 6 个月和 1 年内继续改善。本研究的结果很重要,因为它们表明,一种最初增加手术时间的技术的复杂性可以被克服,并变得比传统技术更有效率。