Jacob H J, Barres C P, Machado B H, Brody M J
University of Iowa, College of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Iowa City 52242.
Am J Med Sci. 1988 Apr;295(4):341-5. doi: 10.1097/00000441-198804000-00021.
The mechanisms of arterial pressure lability in rats following sinoaortic deafferentation (SAD) remain unknown. In this paper, we review several studies that have investigated the potential mechanisms of this lability. Combined ganglionic and alpha-adrenergic receptor blockade reduced lability but not to control levels, indicating that the sympathetic nervous system plays a major role but is not the only mechanism involved in the generation of lability. When ganglionic blockade was combined with blockade of an endogenous humoral vasoconstrictor (vasopressin or angiotensin), lability was returned to control levels in SAD rats; however, humoral blockade alone did not alter lability. Infusion of phenylephrine or endogenous vasoconstrictors in the presence of combined neural and humoral blockade increased arterial pressure lability to levels similar to those found in rats with SAD. The neurogenic contribution to lability was further investigated by recording renal sympathetic nerve activity in conscious freely moving intact rats and rats with SAD. These studies demonstrated that one day after SAD, there was little direct correlation between transient changes in renal sympathetic nerve activity and arterial pressure lability. Thus, the evidence presented in this paper is consistent with the hypothesis that arterial pressure lability is not the direct result of unbuffered variations in sympathetic discharge but rather is produced by an interaction between neural and humoral components.
去窦主动脉神经支配(SAD)后大鼠动脉血压不稳定的机制尚不清楚。在本文中,我们回顾了几项研究,这些研究探讨了这种不稳定的潜在机制。联合神经节和α-肾上腺素能受体阻断可降低血压不稳定程度,但未降至对照水平,这表明交感神经系统起主要作用,但不是产生不稳定的唯一机制。当神经节阻断与内源性体液血管收缩剂(血管加压素或血管紧张素)阻断联合使用时,SAD大鼠的血压不稳定恢复到对照水平;然而,单独的体液阻断并未改变血压不稳定。在联合神经和体液阻断的情况下,输注去氧肾上腺素或内源性血管收缩剂会使动脉血压不稳定增加到与SAD大鼠相似的水平。通过记录清醒自由活动的完整大鼠和SAD大鼠的肾交感神经活动,进一步研究了神经源性对血压不稳定的影响。这些研究表明,SAD后一天,肾交感神经活动的短暂变化与动脉血压不稳定之间几乎没有直接相关性。因此,本文提供的证据与以下假设一致,即动脉血压不稳定不是交感神经放电无缓冲变化的直接结果,而是由神经和体液成分之间的相互作用产生的。