Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6GX, UK.
Physio Praxis Outpatient Clinic, 14, Ethnikis Aminis St., 54621 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Physiotherapy. 2020 Dec;109:13-32. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
An increasing number of patients are attending the Emergency Department (ED) with back pain with or without sciatica. There is evidence to suggest that medical management is varied and inconsistent.
The purpose of this study was to review the literature to determine the evidence base for the therapeutic management of adults presenting with back pain with or without sciatica in the ED.
A systematic review of the literature included the therapeutic management of patients presenting in the ED. Articles published in peer review journals in English language up to August 2018 were searched for in the following data-bases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, ZETOC, PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), Web of Science, Open Grey and ETHOS. A narrative synthesis approach was followed.
Twenty two studies, including 17 randomised control trials, one randomised control pilot study, two cohort studies, one cohort pilot study and one retrospective audit were included. The Downs and Black methodological quality scores ranged from 16 to 31 with a mean score of 24 out of a possible 32.
Evidence suggests that Naproxen alone should be considered as first line management in cases of back pain without sciatica. Intra-venous corticosteroids should be considered in the management of cases of severe sciatica. More high quality trials are needed to determine an evidence-based management protocol for the treatment of acute low back pain in the ED, specifically focusing on non-pharmacological management and the first line management of patients presenting with LBP with sciatica. Systematic Review Registration Number PROSPERO CRD42016042087.
越来越多的腰痛患者(伴或不伴坐骨神经痛)到急诊科就诊。有证据表明,医学治疗方法多种多样且不一致。
本研究旨在回顾文献,确定急诊科腰痛(伴或不伴坐骨神经痛)患者的治疗管理的循证依据。
对发表在同行评议期刊上的英文文献进行系统回顾,检索数据库包括 MEDLINE、EMBASE、SCOPUS、CINAHL、ZETOC、PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆(Cochrane 系统评价数据库)、Web of Science、Open Grey 和 ETHOS。采用叙述性综合方法。
共纳入 22 项研究,包括 17 项随机对照试验、1 项随机对照试验预试验、2 项队列研究、1 项队列研究预试验和 1 项回顾性审计。Downs 和 Black 方法学质量评分范围为 16-31 分,平均得分为 32 分中的 24 分。
证据表明,对于无坐骨神经痛的腰痛,仅使用萘普生即可作为一线治疗方法。对于严重坐骨神经痛,应考虑使用静脉内皮质类固醇。需要更多高质量的试验来确定急诊科急性腰痛的循证治疗方案,特别是关注非药物治疗和伴有坐骨神经痛的腰痛患者的一线治疗。系统评价注册编号 PROSPERO CRD42016042087。