Dammann Gerhard, Rudaz Myriam, Benecke Cord, Riemenschneider Anke, Walter Marc, Pfaltz Monique C, Küchenhoff Joachim, Clarkin John F, Gremaud-Heitz Daniela J
Psychiatric Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Münsterlingen Psychiatric Hospital, Münsterlingen, Switzerland.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 29;11:1658. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01658. eCollection 2020.
The purpose of the present study was threefold: first, to investigate the facial affective behavior in patients with a borderline personality disorder (BPD); second, to examine whether these patients could be divided into clusters according to facial affective behavior; and third, to test whether these clusters would influence the inpatient treatment outcome.
Thirty inpatients with BPD were assessed with the Structured Clinical Interviews for DSM-IV Axis I and II Disorders (SCID I, SCID II) and had to complete a series of questionnaires before and directly after the 12-week long inpatient treatment. Facial affective behavior was recorded during the structured interview for personality organization (STIPO) and afterward coded with the emotional facial action coding system (EMFACS). Measures on psychopathology [beck depression inventory (BDI), Spielberger state and trait anxiety inventory (STAI), Spielberger state and trait anger inventory (STAXI), and symptom cheklist-90-revised (SCL-90-R)], interpersonal problems [Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP)], and personality organization [inventory of personality organization (IPO)] were administered.
Cluster analysis before the treatment yielded two groups that differed in general facial expressivity, and regarding the display of anger, contempt, and disgust. The effect sizes of the repeated measures ANOVAs showed that persons with higher scores on the affective facial expressions benefitted more from the treatment in terms of STAI state anxiety, STAXI state and trait anger, IIP total, and the two scales primitive defenses and identity diffusion of the IPO, whereas persons with lower scores benefitted more on the scale IPO reality testing.
Our results indicated some initial trends for the importance of facial affective behavior in patients with BPD and their treatment outcome.
本研究目的有三个方面:第一,调查边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者的面部情感行为;第二,检查这些患者是否可根据面部情感行为分为不同类别;第三,测试这些类别是否会影响住院治疗结果。
30名BPD住院患者接受了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版轴I和轴II障碍的结构化临床访谈(SCID I、SCID II),并在为期12周的住院治疗前后分别完成一系列问卷。在人格组织结构化访谈(STIPO)期间记录面部情感行为,之后使用情感面部动作编码系统(EMFACS)进行编码。采用了心理病理学测量工具[贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、斯皮尔伯格状态和特质焦虑量表(STAI)、斯皮尔伯格状态和特质愤怒量表(STAXI)以及症状自评量表90修订版(SCL - 90 - R)]、人际问题测量工具[人际问题清单(IIP)]和人格组织测量工具[人格组织清单(IPO)]。
治疗前的聚类分析产生了两组,这两组在总体面部表情以及愤怒、轻蔑和厌恶的表现方面存在差异。重复测量方差分析的效应量表明,在情感面部表情上得分较高的人在STAI状态焦虑、STAXI状态和特质愤怒、IIP总分以及IPO的原始防御和身份弥散这两个量表方面从治疗中获益更多,而得分较低的人在IPO现实检验量表上获益更多。
我们的结果表明,面部情感行为在BPD患者及其治疗结果中的重要性存在一些初步趋势。